Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of Transgene Copy Number in Stably Transfected Mammalian Cells by PCR-Capillary Electrophoresis Assay

  • Published:
Biochemical Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quantitative determination of transgene copy number in stably transfected mammalian cells has been traditionally estimated by Southern blot analysis. Recently, other methods have become available for appraisal of gene copy number, such as real-time PCR. Herein we describe a new method based on a fluorescently labeled PCR, followed by capillary electrophoresis. We amplified our target gene (prothrombin) and the internal control originating from genomic DNA (18S rRNA) in the same PCR tube and calculated the mean peak height ratio of the target:control gene for every cell clone sample. With this approach we identified stably transfected cell clones bearing the same transgene copy number. The results of our assay were confirmed by real-time PCR. Our method proves to be fast, low-cost, and reproducible compared with traditionally used methods. This assay can be used as a rapid screening tool for the determination of gene copy number in gene expression experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D’Haene B, Vandesompele J, Hellemans J (2010) Accurate and objective copy number profiling using real-time quantitative PCR. Methods 50:262–270. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.12.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fourney RM, Aubin R, Dietrich KD, Paterson MC (1991) Determination of foreign gene copy number in stably transfected cell lines by southern transfer analysis. Methods Mol Biol 7:381–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser H, Wagner R (1997) Mammalian cell biotechnology in protein production. Walter de Gruyter, New York, pp 1–190

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollox EJ, Akrami SM, Armour JA (2002) DNA copy number analysis by MAPH: molecular diagnostic applications. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2(4):370–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huggett JF, Novak T, Garson JA, Green C, Morris-Jones SD, Miller RF, Zumla A (2008) Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon. BMC Res Notes 28(1):70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallioniemi A, Visakorpi T, Karhu R, Pinkel D, Kallioniemi OP (1996) Gene copy number analysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization. Methods 9:113–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larramendy ML, Tarkkanen M, Valle J, Kivioja AH, Ervasti H, Karaharju E, Salmivalli T, Elomaa I, Knuutila S (1997) Gains, losses, and amplifications of DNA sequences evaluated by comparative genomic hybridization in chondrosarcomas. Am J Pathol 150:685–691

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucito R, West J, Reiner A, Alexander J, Esposito D, Mishra B, Powers S, Norton L, Wigler M (2000) Detecting gene copy number fluctuations in tumor cells by microarray analysis of genomic representations. Genome Res 10:1726–1736

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martín I, García T, Fajardo V, Rojas M, Pegels N, Hernández PE, Martín IG (2009) SYBR-Green real-time PCR approach for the detection and quantification of pig DNA in feedstuffs. Meat Sci 82(2):252–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poropat RA, Nicholson GA (1998) Determination of gene dosage at the PMP22 and androgen receptor loci by quantitative PCR. Clin Chem 44(4):724–730

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prior TW (1998) Determining gene dosage. Clin Chem 44(4):703–704

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sachchithananthan M, Stasinopoulos SJ, Wilusz J, Medcalf RL (2005) The relationship between the prothrombin upstream sequence element and the G20210A polymorphism: the influence of a competitive environment for mRNA 3′-end formation. Nucleic Acids Res 33(3):1010–1020

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sellner LN, Taylor GR (2004) MLPA and MAPH: new techniques for detection of gene deletions. Hum Mutat 23:413–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3(7):Research0034

    Google Scholar 

  • Whale AS, Huggett JF, Cowen S, Speirs V, Shaw J, Ellison S, Foy CA, Scott DJ (2012) Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation. Nucleic Acids Res 40(11):e82

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolffs P, Grage H, Hagberg O, Radstrom P (2004) Impact of DNA polymerases and their buffer systems on quantitative real time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 42:408–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wurm FM (2004) Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 22(11):1393–1398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant No. 173008 from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia. The authors would like to thank Dr. Vera Ignjatovic for grammar corrections of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iva Pruner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pruner, I., Djordjevic, V., Gvozdenov, M. et al. Determination of Transgene Copy Number in Stably Transfected Mammalian Cells by PCR-Capillary Electrophoresis Assay. Biochem Genet 52, 159–165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-013-9636-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-013-9636-3

Keywords

Navigation