Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular Analysis of the Relatedness of Five Domesticated Turkey Strains

  • Published:
Biochemical Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our knowledge of the genetic relatedness among the eight existing domesticated turkey strains is limited. To begin to address this paucity, genetic relatedness among five turkey strains (Blue Slate, Bourbon Red, Narragansett, Royal Palm, and Spanish Black) was investigated using three molecular marker systems: randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), microsatellite, and SNPs derived from a sequence tagged site and a cloned RAPD fragment. The RAPD analyses were based on five primers that revealed a total of 14 informative DNA fragments in all five populations. The microsatellite analyses involved two informative alleles from three primer-pairs. A total of nine SNPs were detected, one of which appeared to be strain specific. This SNP formed the basis of a PCR-RFLP genotyping procedure developed to distinguish one of the strains from the other four. Evidence from these analyses including the SNP-based RFLP-PCR suggests that Royal Palm is distinct from the other four strains, though more closely related to Narragansett. These data provide, for the first time, molecular evidence of the potential relationships among noncommercial domesticated turkey strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EST:

Expressed Sequence Tag

SNP:

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

References

  • Austic, R. E., and Nesheim, M. C. (1990). Poultry Production, 13th edn., Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohner, J. V. (2001). Turkeys. In The Encyclopedia of Historic and Endangered Livestock and Poultry Breeds, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnington, E. A., Stallard, L. C., Hillel, J., and Siegel, P. B. (1994). Genetic diversity among commercial chicken populations estimated from DNA fingerprints. Poult. Sci. 73:1218–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, D. L., and Clark, A. G. (1997). Principles of Population Genetics, 3rd edn., Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. B., Song, Y. Q., Hsei, M., Zahorchak, R., Chiu, J., Teuscher, C., and Smith, E. J. (1999). Development and characterization of genetic mapping resources for the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). J. Heredity 90:240–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnlein, U., Zadworny, D., Dawe, Y., Fairfull, R. W., and Gavora, J. S. (1990). Assessment of inbreeding by DNA fingerprinting: Development of a calibration curve using defined strains of chickens. Genetics 125:161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latch, E. K., Smith, E. J., and Rhodes, O. E., Jr. (2002). Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in wild and domestic turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2:176–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1991). Analysis of population genetic structure by DNA fingerprinting. In Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A. J., and Wolf, R. (eds.), Fingerprinting Approaches and Applications, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., and Milligan, B. G. (1994). Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol. Ecol. 3:91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, K. E., Theimer, T. C., Rhodes, O. E., Jr., Greenberg, D. L., and Keim, P. (2002). Genetic variation across the historical range of the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Mol. Ecol. 11:643–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetting, W. S., Lee, H. K., Flanders, D. J., Wiesner, G. L., Sellers, T. A., and King, R. A. (1995). Linkage analysis with multiplexed short tandem repeat polymorphisms using infrared fluorescence and M13 tailed primers. Genomics 30:450–458.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsuksili, S., Wimmers, K., and Horst, P. (1998). Evaluation of genetic variation within and between different chicken lines by DNA fingerprinting. J. Heredity 89:17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, K. M., Mendoza, K. M., and Beattie, C. W. (2000). Comparative analysis of microsatellite loci in chicken and turkey. Genome 43:796–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, D., Rao, K. B. A., Singh, R. V., and Totey, S. M. (2001). Genetic diversity among chicken breeds estimated through randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Anim. Biotechnol. 12(2):111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. J., Jones, C. P., Bartlett, J., and Nestor, K. E. (1996). Use of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers for the genetic analysis of relatedness and diversity in chickens and turkeys. Poult. Sci. 75:579–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. J., Shi, L., Prevost, L., Drummond, P., Ramlal, S., Smith, G., Pierce, K., and Foster, J. (2001). Expressed sequence tags for the chicken genome from a normalized, ten-day-old white leghorn whole embryo cDNA library. 2: Comparative DNA sequence analysis of guinea fowl, quail, and turkey genomes. Poult. Sci. 80:1263–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. J., Shi, L., and Smith, G. (2002). Expressed sequence tags for the chicken genome from a normalized 10-day-old white leghorn whole-embryo cDNA library. 3: DNA sequence analysis of genetic variation in commercial chicken populations. Genome 45:261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H., and Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, X., Zhu, J., Velleman, S. G., and Nestor, K. E. (1998). Genetic diversity of commercial turkey primary breeding lines as estimated by DNA fingerprinting. Poult. Sci. 77:802–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H., and Lamont, S. J. (1999, Aug.). Genetic characterization of biodiversity in highly inbred chicken lines by microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 30(4):256–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., Nestor, K. E., Patterson, R. A., Jackwood, D. J., and Emmerson, D. A. (1996). Measurement of genetic parameters within and between turkey lines using DNA fingerprinting. Poult. Sci. 75:439–446.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward J. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, E.J., Geng, T., Long, E. et al. Molecular Analysis of the Relatedness of Five Domesticated Turkey Strains. Biochem Genet 43, 35–47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-005-1065-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-005-1065-5

KEY WORDS

Navigation