Skip to main content
Log in

Can leaf-mining flies generate damage with significant impact on the submerged weed Lagarosiphon major?

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective biological control of a weed cannot be achieved unless agents can inflict sufficient damage for the plant’s growth and reproduction to be significantly depressed. The leaf-mining fly Hydrellia lagarosiphon is being considered for release in Ireland and New Zealand as a biocontrol agent for the invasive African macrophyte Lagarosiphon major. However no leaf-mining biological control agent has achieved successful control of any submerged macrophyte to date. Pre-release efficacy experiments help predict the likelihood of the biocontrol agents impact provided trials take into account expected agent densities and field conditions. Sustained damage induced by consecutive generations of the leaf-mining fly was capable of halting plant growth and undamaged shoot fragments produced 100 % more shoot biomass in just 70 days when compared with those exposed to larval damage. The number of larvae required to induce this level of damage was less than the maximum number of larvae a plant can sustain under both laboratory and natural field conditions and was between three and four larvae per shoot tip. Larval damage to L. major also had a significant effect on the subsequent establishment of detached apical shoots under field conditions. All control shoots displayed 100 % establishment whereas medium (three larvae per shoot) and high larval density plants (five larvae per shoot) had 85 and 25 % establishment, respectively. Pre-release trials indicate that relatively low larval abundances of H. lagarosiphon can contribute to the suppression of plant growth and reduce the establishment of shoot fragments, making this species a potentially effective biocontrol agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal AA (2000) Overcompensation of plants in response to herbivory and the by-product benefits of mutualism. Trends Plant Sci 5:309–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baars J-R, Caffrey JM (2010) The Frond-feeding weevil (Stenopelmus rufinasus Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Erirhinidae) a natural enemy of Azolla filiculoides in Ireland. Ir Nat J 30:142–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars J-R, Coetzee J, Martin G, Hill MP, Caffrey JM (2010) Natural enemies from South Africa improve the prospects for biological control of Lagarosiphon major (Ridl.) Moss ex Wager (Hydrocharitaceae) in Europe. Hydrobiologia 656:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balciunas JK, Burrows DW (1996) Distribution, abundance and field host-range of Hydrellia balciunasi bock (Diptera: Ephydridae) a biological control agent for the aquatic weed Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) royle. Aust J Entomol 35:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balciunas JK, Center TD (1981) Preliminary host specificity tests of a Panamanian Parapoynx as a potential biological control agent for hydrilla. Environ Entomol 10:462–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology: individuals, populations and communities, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley YM, Briese DT, Rees M (2003) Demography and management of the invasive plant species Hypericum perforatum. I. Using multi-level mixed-effects models for characterizing growth, survival and fecundity in a long-term data set. J Appl Ecol 40:481–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera Walsh G, Magalí Dalto Y, Mattioli FM, Carruthers RI, Anderson LW (2012) Biology and ecology of Brazilian elodea (Egeria densa) and its specific herbivore, Hydrellia sp., in Argentina. Biol Control 57:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey J, Millane M, Evers S, Moran H (2011) Management of Lagarosiphon major (Ridley) moss in Lough Corrib, a review. Biol Environ 111B:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Center TD, Parys K, Grodowitz M, Wheeler GS, Dray FA, O’Brien CW, Cofrancesco A (2013) Evidence of establishment of Bagous hydrilla (Coleoptera: curculionidae), a biological control agent of Hydrilla verticillata (Hydrocharitales: Hydrocharitaceae) in North America? Fla Entomol 96:180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clewley GD, Eschen R, Shaw RH, Wright DJ (2012) The effectiveness of classical biological control of invasive plants. J Appl Ecol 49:1287–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee JA, Bownes A, Martin GD (2011) Prospects for the biological control of submerged aquatic macrophytes. Afr Entomol 19:469–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruttwell McFadyen RE (1998) Biological control of weeds. Annu Rev Entomol 43:369–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuda JP, Coon BR, Dao YM, Center TD (2011) Effect of an herbivorous stem mining midge on the growth of hydrilla. J Aquat Plant Manag 49:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster JP, Pollard E (1981) Fluctuations in resource availability and insect populations. Oecologia 50:12–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle RD, Grodowitz MJ, Smart RM, Owens C (2002) Impact of herbivory by Hydrillia pakistanae (Diptera: ephydridae) on growth and photosynthetic potential of Hydrilla verticillata. Biol Control 24:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle R, Grodowitz MJ, Smart M, Owens C (2007) Separate and interactive effects of competition and herbivory on the growth, expansion, and tuber formation of Hydrilla verticillata. Biol Control 41:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle W (2013) Field and laboratory based evaluation of natural enemies screened as biological control agents of the aquatic weed Lagarosiphon major. PhD thesis, University College Dublin, Ireland

  • Earle W, Mangan R, O Brien M, Baars JR (2013) Biology of Polypedilum n. sp. (Diptera: Chironomidae), a promising candidate agent for the biological control of the aquatic weed Lagarosiphon major (Hydrocharitaceae) in Ireland. Biocontrol Sci Tech 23:1267–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF, Lewis MA, Neubert MG, van Den Driessche P (2002) Invasion theory and biological control. Ecol Lett 5:148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodowitz MJ, Cofrancesco AF, Stewart RM, Madsen J, Morgan D (2003) Possible impact of lake seminole Hydrilla by the introduced leaf-mining fly Hydrellia pakistanae. ERDC/EL TR-03-18, U.S. Army Engineer Research And Development Center, Vicksburg, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodowitz MJ, Owens CS, Smart RM, Nachtrieb HGM (2007) Impact of herbivory and plant competition on the growth of hydrilla in small ponds. APCRP-BC-08, U.S. Army Engineer Research And Development Center, Vicksburg, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongejans E, Sheppard AW, Shea K (2006) What controls the native population dynamics of the alien invasive thistle Carduus nutans in its native range? J Appl Ecol 43:877–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan R, Baars J-R (2013) Use of life table statistics and degree day values to predict the invasion success of Hydrellia lagarosiphon Deeming (Diptera: Ephydridae), a leaf mining fly of Lagarosiphon major (Ridley) Moss (Hydrocharitaceae), in Ireland and the rest of Europe. Biol Control 64:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland DG, Barko JW (1996) Investigations of the production, transport, and survival of monoecious Hydrilla propagules in the tidal Potomac River. Technical Report A-96-7, Aquatic Plant Control Research Program, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS

  • Owens CS, Grodowitz MJ, Smart RM (2008) Impact of insect herbivory on the establishment of Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle fragments. J Aquat Plant Manag 46:199–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter Q (2013) Feasibility of biocontrol of Lagaorsiphon major in New Zealand. Landcare Research Contract Report LC 1234 Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RKD, Higley LG (2001) Illuminating the black box: the relationship between injury and yield. In: Peterson RKD, Higley LG (eds) Biotic stress and yield loss. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees M, Paynter Q (1997) Biological control of scotch broom: modelling the determinants of abundance and the potential impact of introduced insect herbivores. J Appl Ecol 34:1203–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler S, Cabrera-Walsh W, Julien M (2009) Cabomba caroliniana gray (Cabombaceae). In: Muniappan R, Reddy GVP, Raman A (eds) Biological control of tropical weeds using arthropods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 88–107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smart RM, Barko JW (1984) Culture methodology for experimental investigations involving rooted submersed aquatic plants. Miscellaneous paper A-89_2, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vickburg, USA

  • StatSoft, Inc., 2005. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.0 http://www.statsoft.co.za

  • Thomas PA, Room PM (1986) Taxonomy and control of Salvinia molesta. Nature 320:581–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche R, Hoddle M, Center T (2008) Control of pests and weeds by natural enemies: an introduction to biological control. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler GS, Center TD (2001) Impact of the biological control agent Hydrellia pakistanae (Diptera: Ephydridae) on the submersed aquatic weed Hydrilla verticillata (Hydrocharitaceae). Biol Control 21:168–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosie Mangan.

Additional information

Handling Editor: S. Raghu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mangan, R., Baars, JR. Can leaf-mining flies generate damage with significant impact on the submerged weed Lagarosiphon major?. BioControl 61, 803–813 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9759-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9759-7

Keywords

Navigation