Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Insights into mortality patterns and causes of death through a process point of view model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Biogerontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process point of view (POV) models of mortality, such as the Strehler–Mildvan and stochastic vitality models, represent death in terms of the loss of survival capacity through challenges and dissipation. Drawing on hallmarks of aging, we link these concepts to candidate biological mechanisms through a framework that defines death as challenges to vitality where distal factors defined the age-evolution of vitality and proximal factors define the probability distribution of challenges. To illustrate the process POV, we hypothesize that the immune system is a mortality nexus, characterized by two vitality streams: increasing vitality representing immune system development and immunosenescence representing vitality dissipation. Proximal challenges define three mortality partitions: juvenile and adult extrinsic mortalities and intrinsic adult mortality. Model parameters, generated from Swedish mortality data (1751–2010), exhibit biologically meaningful correspondences to economic, health and cause-of-death patterns. The model characterizes the twentieth century epidemiological transition mainly as a reduction in extrinsic mortality resulting from a shift from high magnitude disease challenges on individuals at all vitality levels to low magnitude stress challenges on low vitality individuals. Of secondary importance, intrinsic mortality was described by a gradual reduction in the rate of loss of vitality presumably resulting from reduction in the rate of immunosenescence. Extensions and limitations of a distal/proximal framework for characterizing more explicit causes of death, e.g. the young adult mortality hump or cancer in old age are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We do note that another significant body of theory links biological processes to mortality but this framework links biological processes directly to the mortality rate and does not track the cumulative effects of processes leading up to mortality (e.g. Yashin et al. 2012, 2016, 2000).

  2. The idea of partitioning mortality into intrinsic and extrinsic parts was originally proposed by Carnes and colleagues (Carnes and Olshansky 1997; Carnes et al. 1996). They defined extrinsic mortality as avoidable mortality and intrinsic mortality as unavoidable mortality. The partition was demonstrated using COD data to calculate extrinsic mortality and intrinsic mortality was calculated as the difference between extrinsic and all-cause mortality (Carnes et al. 2006). However, the partitions based on the two vitality processes (Li and Anderson 2013) and on COD yield different mortality patterns with age. For both partitions, extrinsic mortality dominates in younger ages but the intrinsic mortality patterns are significantly different in the two methods. In the COD method intrinsic mortality has a Gompertz-like age distribution while in the vitality method intrinsic mortality is negligible in young age, then rises rapidly and plateaus in old age (Weitz and Fraser 2001). Consequently, the two methods of partitioning mortality cannot be easily compared.

  3. Other terms for vitality include viability (Weitz and Fraser 2001), vital capacity (Whitmore 1986) and whole organisms state variable (Stroustrup et al. 2016). Other frameworks have proposed similar ideas, e.g. frailty, a fixed quantity endowed at the beginning of life (Vaupel et al. 1979) and redundancy theory (Gavrilov and Gavrilova 2003), but these applications were based more in a mortality rate POV and are not explored here.

  4. Carnes et al. (2008) based on (Arking 2006) suggested five characteristics of aging denoted C.U.P.I.D as Cumulative, Universal, Progressive, Intrinsic and Detrimental.

  5. Example age distribution of the mortality from cardiovascular diseases for the female Swedish population 2000–2004 is available from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Cause of Death (DOC) Visualization. Seattle, WA: IHME, University of Washington, 2016. Available from http://vizhub.health.ord/cod/. (Accessed 11/21/2016).

  6. Example age distribution of incidence of colon and rectum cancer for male Swedish population 2000–2009 is available from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Cause of Death (DOC) Visualization. Seattle, WA: IHME, University of Washington, 2016. Available from http://vizhub.health.ord/cod/. (Accessed 11/21/2016).

  7. Human Mortality Database University of California, Berkeley (USAUN), and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany). Data downloaded 01/11/2014 from www.mortality.org.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Institute of Health Grant R21AG046760.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James J. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, J.J., Li, T. & Sharrow, D.J. Insights into mortality patterns and causes of death through a process point of view model. Biogerontology 18, 149–170 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-016-9669-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-016-9669-1

Keywords

Navigation