Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geostatistical assessment for the regional zonation of seismic site effects in a coastal urban area using a GIS framework

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earthquake-induced hazards are profoundly affected by site effects related to the amplification of ground motions, which are strongly influenced by local geologic conditions such as soil thickness, bedrock depth, and soil stiffness. Seismic disasters are often more severe over soft soils than over stiff soils or rocks due to differences in local site effects. In this study, on the basis of a geotechnical information system (GTIS) framework, we developed an advanced geostatistical assessment for the regional zonation of seismic site effects. In particular, to reliably predict spatial geotechnical information, we developed a procedural methodology for building an advanced GTIS within a geographic information system framework and applied it to the Busan area in Korea. The systemized GTIS comprised four functional components: database, geostatistical analysis, geotechnical analysis, and visualization. First, to build the GTIS, we collected pre-existing geotechnical data in and around the study area, and then conducted a walk-over site survey to acquire surface geo-knowledge data. Second, we determined the optimum geostatistical estimation method using a cross-validation-based verification test, considering site conditions. The advanced GTIS was used in a practical application to estimate the site effects in the study area. We created seismic zoning maps of geotechnical earthquake parameters, such as the depth to bedrock and the site period, and present them as part of a regional synthetic strategy for earthquake risk assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthymidis M, Theodoulidis N (2012) Constraining site response and shallow geophysical structure by ambient noise measurements and 1D numerical simulations: the case of Grevena town (N. Greece). Bull Earthq Eng 10:1685–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azpurua M, Dos-Ramos K (2010) A comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimation of average electromagnetic field magnitude. Prog Electromagn Res M 14:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthq Spectra 10(4):617–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (2000) Empirical evidence for site coefficients in building code provisions. Earthq Spectra 18(2):189–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan S, Triantafilis J (2009) Mapping water table depth using geophysical and environmental variables. Groundwater 41(1):80–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgos P, Madejόn E, Pérez-de-Mora A, Cabrera F (2006) Spatial variability of the chemical characteristics of a trace-element-contaminated soil before and after remediation. Geoderma 130(1–2):157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codermatz R, Nicolich R, Slejko D (2003) Seismic risk assessment and GIS technology: applications to infrastructures in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region (NE Italy). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(11):1677–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • David M (1976) The practice of kriging. In: Advanced geostatistics in the mining industry, pp 31–48

  • Delbari M, Afrasiab P, Loiskandl W (2006) A comparison of prediction methods for mapping soil salinity. In: Kammerer G, Kastanek F (eds) Soil physics and rural water management-progress, needs and challenges. Proceedings of the International Symposium SOPHYWA, pp 35–40

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user’s guide. Oxford University Press, New York, 340

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobry R, Ramos R, Power MS (1999) Site factors and site categories in seismic codes. Technical report MCEER-99-0010, multidisciplinary center for earthquake engineering research

  • Emery X (2006) Ordinary multigaussian kriging for mapping conditional probabilities of soil properties. Geoderma 132(1–2):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esri (2012) An overview of the interpolation toolset. http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#. An overview of the Interpolation tools

  • Gangopadhyay S, Gautam TR, Gupta AD (1999) Subsurface characterization using artificial neural network and GIS. J Comput Civil Eng 13(3):153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Fernandez M, Jimenez MJ (2012) Site characterization in the Vega Baja, SE Spain, using ambient-noise H/V analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 10:1163–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1998) Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physicochemical soil properties. Biol Fertil Soils 27:315–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state of the art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (2001) Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma 103:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarascio M, Huybrechts CJ, David M (1976) Advanced geostatistics in the mining industry. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute held at the Istituto di Geologia Applicata of the University of Rome, vol 24

  • Holdstock DA (1998) Editorial: basics of geographic information systems (GIS). J Comput Civil Eng 13(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DS, Yoon JK (2006) Development of new site classification system for the regions of shallow bedrock in Korea. J Earthq Eng 10(3):331–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DS, Chung CK, Sun CG, Bang ES (2002) Site assessment and evaluation of spatial earthquake ground motion of Kyeongju. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(5):371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DS, Lee SH, Yoon JK (2008) Development of site classification system and modification of site coefficients in Korea based on mean shear wave velocity of soil and depth to bedrock. J Korean Soc Civil Eng 28(1C):63–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiremidjian AS (1997) Spatial analysis in geotechnical earthquake engineering. Spatial analysis in soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, Geotechnical Special Publication 67, ASCE:1–14

  • Knudsen H, Kim YC (1978) Application of geostatistics to roll front type uranium deposits. Society of Mining Engineers of AIME, Denver, Colorado: 78–94

  • Kolat C, Doyuran V, Ayday C, Süzen ML (2006) Preparation of a geotechnical microzonation model using geographical information systems based on multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol 87(3–4):241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro M, Garcia-Jerez A, Alcala FJ, Vidal F, Enomoto T (2014) Local site effect microzonation of Lorca town (SE Spain). Bull Earthq Eng 12:1933–1959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olea R (1991) Geostatistical glossary and multilingual dictionary. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver MA, Webster R (1991) How geostatistics can help you. Soil Use Manag 7(4):206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis K, Riga E, Anastasiadis A (2013) New code site classification, amplification factors and normalized response spectra based on a worldwide ground-motion database. Bull Earthq Eng 11:925–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TP, Metternicht G (2006) Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Comput Electron Agric 50(2):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Marek A, Bray JD, Abrahamson NA (2000) A geotechnical seismic site response evaluation procedure. Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Oakland, New Zealand, CD-ROM 1590

  • Rodriguez-Marek A, Bray JD, Abrahamson NA (2001) An empirical geotechnical seismic site response procedure. Earthq Spectra 17(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas K, Graff C, Morcet M, Aran C (2003) Implications of the spatial variability of landfill emission rates on geospatial analyses. Waste Manag 23:599–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun CG (2004) Geotechnical information system and site amplification characteristics for earthquake ground motions at inland of the Korean peninsula, Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea

  • Sun CG (2010) Suggestion of additional criteria for site categorization in Korea by quantifying regional specific characteristics on seismic response. Geophys Geophys Explor 13(3):203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun CG (2012) Applications of a GIS-based geotechnical tool to assess spatial earthquake hazards in an urban area. Environ Earth Sci 65(7):1987–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun CG, Chung CK (2008) Assessment of site effects of a shallow and wide basin using geotechnical information-based spatial characterization. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(12):1028–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun CG, Kim DS, Chung CK (2005) Geologic site conditions and site coefficients for estimating earthquake ground motions in the inland areas of Korea. Eng Geol 81(4):446–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun CG, Chun SH, Ha TG, Chung CK, Kim DS (2008) Development and application of GIS-based tool for earthquake-induced hazard prediction. Comput Geotech 35(3):436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun CK, Kim HS, Chung CK, Chi HC (2014) Spatial zonations for regional assessment of seismic site effects in the Seoul metropolitan area. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 56:44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai YB, Huang MW (2000) Strong ground motion characteristics of the Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake of September 21, 1999. Earthq Eng Eng Seismol 2:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel H (1995) Multivariate geostatistics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg D, Uchrin C, Coogan P (1991) Estimating exposure using kriging: a simulation study. Environ Health Perspect 94:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R, Oliver MA (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills CJ, Petersen M, Bryant WA, Reichle M, Saucedo GJ, Tan S (2000) A site-conditions map for California based on geology and shear-wave velocity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90(6B):187–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yost RS, Uehara G, Fox RL (1982) Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas. II. Kriging. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:1033–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Michalak AM (2009) Characterizing attribute distributions in water sediments by geostatistical downscaling. Environ Sci Technol 43:9267–9273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude for the support from the Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Earthquake Research Center, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, 124 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-350, Korea

    Chang-Guk Sun & Han-Saem Kim

Authors
  1. Chang-Guk Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Han-Saem Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han-Saem Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, CG., Kim, HS. Geostatistical assessment for the regional zonation of seismic site effects in a coastal urban area using a GIS framework. Bull Earthquake Eng 14, 2161–2183 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9908-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9908-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation