Abstract
Silicone sealant is usually interposed between panels of precast façades. In ordinary cladding panel configurations, relative sliding between panels occurs under lateral actions. The shear drifts and consequent stresses arising in the silicone strips may lead to a significant increase of the load demand in the cladding panel connections and affect the seismic behaviour of the structural system. This paper presents the results of experimental tests and numerical analyses carried out to clarify the role of the silicone sealant on the seismic response of precast structures with cladding panels. An experimental campaign including monotonic and cyclic tests on both silicone strips applied to small concrete blocks and two panel sub-assembly sealed with silicone, has been developed at Politecnico di Milano. Furthermore, cyclic and seismic pseudo-dynamic tests on a full-scale prototype of precast building with cladding panels sealed with silicone, have been performed at the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. The results of the experimental tests are presented and compared with the results of numerical simulations. Some recommendations for seismic design of precast frame structures with cladding panels, considering the effect of silicone sealant, are finally provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Behr RA (1998) Seismic performance of architectural glass in mid-rise curtain walls. J Archit Eng 4(3):94–98
Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Toniolo G (2012) Seismic behaviour of precast buildings with cladding panels. In: 15th world conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 Sep 2012
Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Toniolo G (2013) Role of wall panel connections on the seismic performance of precast structures. Bull Earthq Eng 11:1061–1081
Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Lamperti M, Toniolo G (2014a) Qualificazione sperimentale di materiali siliconici per giunti di pannelli prefabbricati. Giornate AICAP 2014 (Associazione Italiana Cemento Armato e Precompresso), Bergamo, Italy, May 22–24, 2014:391–398 (in Italian)
Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Toniolo G (2014b) Experimental and numerical assessment of dissipative connections for precast structures with cladding panels. In: 2nd European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology (ECEES), Istanbul, Turkey, p 2168, 25–29 Aug 2014
Broker KA, Fisher S, Memari AM (2012) Seismic racking test evaluation of silicone used in a four-sided structural sealant glazed curtain wall system. J ASTM Int 9(3):104–144
Carbary LD, Ryan MW (2004) Secondary drainage system for architectural panel systems. ASTM Spec Tech Publ 1453:3–13
CEN-EN 1998-1:2004 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European committee for standardization, Brussels, Belgium
Colombo A, Negro P, Toniolo G (2014) The influence of claddings on the seismic response of precast structures: the Safecladding project. In: 2nd European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology (ECEES), Istanbul, Turkey, p 1877, 25–29 Aug
Dal Lago B (2015) Seismic performance of precast structures with dissipative cladding panel connections. PhD Thesis dissertation, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Ding S, Liu D (2005) Accelerated aging on sealants and a quantificational way to evaluate the durability. J Test Eval 34(2):1–4
Lacasse MA, Bryce JE, Margeson JC (1995) Evaluation of cyclic fatigue as a means of assessing the performance of construction joint sealants: silicone sealants. Sci Technol Build Seals Sealants Glaz Waterproofing ASTM STP 1243(4):49–64
Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826
Meunier L, Chagnon G, Favier D, Orgeas L, Vacher P (2008) Mechanical experimental characterization and numerical modelling of an unfilled silicone rubber. Polym Test 29:765–777
Negro P, Lamperti Tornaghi M (2016) Seismic response of precast structures with vertical cladding panels: the SAFECLADDING experimental campaign. Eng Struct 132:205–228. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.020
Roland CM (2006) Mechanical behaviour of rubber at high strain rates. Rubber Chem Technol 79:429–459
Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielsen NN (1970) Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. J Struct Division Am Soc Civil Eng (ASCE) 96(12):2557–2573
Toniolo G, Colombo A (2012) Precast concrete structures: the lesson learnt from L’Aquila earthquake. Struct Concr 13(2):73–83
Acknowledgements
The work presented in this paper has been funded mainly by the European Commission within the FP7-SME-2011 SAFECLADDING research project (Grant agreement No. 314122, 2012), and partially by the Italian Department of Civil Protection (DPC) and the Italian Laboratories University Network of Earthquake Engineering (ReLUIS) within the research program DPC-ReLUIS 2014–2016. The financial supports of the funding institutions are gratefully acknowledged. The contribution of Marjo Cerriku and prof. Liberato Ferrara to the execution of the local tests performed at Laboratorio Prove e Materiali (LPM) of Politecnico di Milano is gratefully appreciated. The experimental tests on the full scale precast prototype has been performed at the European Laboratory of Structural Assessment (ELSA) of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission. Special thanks are due to all members of the JRC team, particularly to Paolo Negro, Javier Molina, and Pierre Pegon. Gratitude and appreciation are also expressed to BS Italia and Styl-Comp companies, particularly to Claudio Pagani and Enzo Ruggeri, for the production and erection of both the testing frame of the sub-assembly tests at Politecnico di Milano and the full scale prototype at JRC. Finally, many thanks to Antonello Gasperi for fostering with his interest the research on this subject.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dal Lago, B., Biondini, F., Toniolo, G. et al. Experimental investigation on the influence of silicone sealant on the seismic behaviour of precast façades. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 1771–1787 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0045-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0045-y