Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of the urban system dysfunction in the assessment of seismic risk in the Mt. Etna area (Italy)

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A procedure for seismic risk assessment is applied to the Mt. Etna area (eastern Sicily, Italy) through assessment of urban system dysfunction following the occurrence of an earthquake. The tool used is based on the Disruption Index as a concept implemented in Simulator QuakeIST, which defines urban disruption following a natural disaster. The first element of the procedure is the definition of the seismic input, which is based on information about historical seismicity and seismogenic faults. The second element is computation of seismic impact on the building stock and infrastructure in the area considered. Information on urban-scale vulnerability was collected and a geographic information system was used to organise the data relating to buildings and network systems (e.g., building stock, schools, strategic structures, lifelines). The central idea underlying the definition of the Disruption Index is identification and evaluation of the impact on a target community through the physical elements that most contribute to severe disruption. The procedure applied in this study (i.e., software and data) constitutes a very useful operational tool to drive the development of strategies to minimise risks from earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostinelli C, Rotondi R (2015) Analysis of macroseismic fields using statistical data depth functions. Considerations leading to attenuation probabilistic modelling. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9778-2

  • Alparone S, Andronico D, Giammanco S, Lodato L (2004) A multidisciplinary approach to detect active pathways for magma migration and eruption at Mt. Etna (Sicily, Italy) before the 2001 and 2002–03 eruptions. J Volcanol Geoth Res 136(1–2):121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzaro R (2004) Seismicity and active tectonics in the Etna region: constraints for a seismotectonic model. In: Bonaccorso A, Calvari S, Coltelli M, Del Negro C, Falsaperla S (eds) Mt. Etna: volcano laboratory. American Geophysical Union, Geophysical monograph, 143, Washington, DC, pp 205–220

  • Azzaro R, D’Amico S, Tuvè T (2011) Estimating the magnitude of historical earthquakes from macroseismic intensity data: new relationships for the volcanic region of Mount Etna (Italy). Seismol Res Lett 82(4):533–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzaro R, D’Amico S, Peruzza L, Tuvè T (2013a) Probabilistic seismic hazard at Mt. Etna (Italy): the contribution of local fault activity in mid-term assessment. J Volcanol Geoth Res 251:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzaro R, D’Amico S, Rotondi R, Tuvè T, Zonno G (2013b) Forecasting seismic scenarios on Etna volcano (Italy) through probabilistic intensity attenuation models: a Bayesian approach. J Volcanol Geoth Res 251:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzaro R, D’Amico S, Tuvè T (2015) Seismic hazard assessment in the volcanic region of Mt. Etna (Italy): a probabilistic approach by macroseismic data applied to local volcano-tectonic seismicity. Bull Earthq Eng (under review for this issue)

  • Behncke B, Neri M, Nagay A (2005) Lava flow hazard at Mount Etna (Italy): new data from a GIS-based study. In Manga M, Ventura G (eds) Kinematics and dynamics of lava flows. Geological Society of America Special Paper 396, pp 189–208. doi:10.1130/2005.2396(13)

  • Benedetti D, Petrini V (1984) On seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings: proposal of an evaluation procedure. L’industria delle Costruzioni 18:66–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardini A, Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S, Parodi S (2007) The vulnerability assessment of current buildings by a macroseismic approach derived from the EMS-98 scale. In: Proceedings of the 3th Congreso Nacional de Ingenieria Sismica, Asociación Española de Ingeniería Sísmica, Girona

  • Branca S, Carbone D, Greco F (2003) Intrusive mechanism of the 2002 NE-Rift eruption at Mt. Etna (Italy) inferred through continuous microgravity data and volcanological evidences. Geophys Res Lett 30(20):2077. doi:10.1029/2003GL018250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini A, Corazza L, Di Pasquale G, Dolce M, Martinelli A, Petrini V (1999) Risultati del progetto LSU-1. In: Censimento di vulnerabilità degli edifici pubblici, strategici e speciali nelle regioni Abruzzo, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Molise, Puglia e Sicilia. Graphic Press s.r.l., L’Aquila, Italy

  • CMTE Working Group (2014) Catalogo Macrosismico dei Terremoti Etnei, 1832-2013. INGV, Catania. http://www.ct.ingv.it/macro/etna/html_index.php

  • Crowley H, Colombi M, Borzi B, Faravelli M, Onida M, Lopez M, Polli D, Meroni F, Pinho R (2009) A comparison of seismic risk maps for Italy. Bull Earthq Eng 7(1):149–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico S, Tuvè T (2013) INGV data survey for UPStrat-MAFA project, internal report

  • D’Amico S, Meroni F, Sousa ML, Zonno G (2015) Building vulnerability and seismic risk analysis in the urban area of Mt. Etna volcano (Italy). Bull Earthq Eng (under review for this issue)

  • Del Negro C, Cappello A, Neri M, Bilotta G, Herault A, Ganci G (2013) Lava flow hazards at Mount Etna: constraints imposed by eruptive history and numerical simulations. Sci Rep 3:3493. doi:10.1038/srep03493

    Google Scholar 

  • ERSTA (2008) Project “ERSTA—Estudo do Risco Sísmico e de Tsunamis do Algarve”

  • Ferreira MA (2012) Risco sísmico em sistemas urbanos. Ph.D. Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. (in portuguese)

  • Ferreira MA, Mota de Sá F, Oliveira CS (2014) Disruption Index, DI: an approach for assessing seismic risk in urban systems (theoretical aspects). Bull Earthq Eng 12(4):1431–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira MA, Mota de Sá F, Oliveira CS (2015) The Disruption Index (DI) as a tool to measure disaster mitigation strategies. Bull Earthq Eng (under review for this issue)

  • Frassine L, Giovinazzi S (2004) Basi di dati a confronto nell’analisi di vulnerabilità sismica dell’edilizia residenziale: un’applicazione per la città di Catania. In: Proceedings of the XI Congresso Nazionale “L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia”, Genova, Italy, CD-Rom

  • Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2001) Una metodologia per l’analisi di vulnerabilità sismica del costruito. In: Proceedings of the X Congresso Nazionale “L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia”, Potenza-Matera, CD-Rom

  • Grimaz S (2014) Can earthquakes trigger serious industrial accidents in Italy? Some considerations following the experiences of 2009 L’Aquila (Italy) and 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquakes. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata 55(1):227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünthal G (ed) (1998) European Macroseismic Scale. Conseil de l´Europe, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Vol. 15. Luxemburg

  • HAZUS MH MR4 (2003) “Technical Manual”, Federal Emergency Management Agency. https://www.fema.gov/hazus

  • ISTAT (1991) 13° censimento generale della popolazione, 1991. Dati sulle caratteristiche strutturale della popolazione e delle abitazioni, Roma

  • Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4:415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locati M, Camassi R, Stucchi M (a cura di) (2011). DBMI11, la versione 2011 del Database Macrosismico Italiano. Milano, Bologna. http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/DBMI11

  • Meroni F, Petrini V, Zonno G (1999) Valutazione della vulnerabilità di edifici su aree estese tramite dati ISTAT, Atti 9° Convegno Nazionale ANIDIS: L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Torino (CD-ROM)

  • Meroni F, Petrini V, Zonno G (2000) Distribuzione nazionale della vulnerabilità media comunale. In: Bernardini A (ed) La vulnerabilità degli edifici. CNR-GNDT, Roma, pp 105–131

    Google Scholar 

  • MPS Working Group (2004) Redazione della mappa di pericolosità sismica prevista dall’Ordinanza PCM 3274 del 20 marzo 2003. Final report for the Civil Protection Department, INGV, Milan-Rome

  • Mota de Sá F, Ferreira MA, Oliveira CS (2015) QuakeIST ®: earthquake scenario simulator using interdependencies. Bull Earthq Eng (under review for this issue)

  • Oliveira CS, Ferreira MA, Mota de Sá F (2012) The concept of a disruption index: application to the overall impact of the July 9, 1998 Faial earthquake (Azores islands). Bull Earthq Eng 10:7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira CS, Ferreira MA, Mota de Sá F (2014) Earthquake risk reduction: from scenario simulators including systemic interdependency to impact indicators. Perspect Eur Earthq Eng Seismol Geotech Geol Earthq Eng 34(9):309–330. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07118-3_9

    Google Scholar 

  • Platania G (1915) Sul periodo sismico del Maggio 1914 nella regione orientale dell’Etna. Mem. Cl. Sci. R. Acc. Zelanti. 7(3):48

    Google Scholar 

  • Provincia di Catania (2002) Programma Provinciale di Protezione Civile—Tavole Tematiche. Provincia Regionale di Catania, Italy, CD-ROM

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotondi R, Zonno G (2004) Bayesian analysis of a probability distribution for local intensity attenuation. Ann Geophys 47(5):1521–1540

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotondi R, Zonno G (2010) Guidelines to use the software PROSCEN. Open archives earth-prints Repository, INGV, Reports. http://hdl.handle.net/2122/6726

  • Rotondi R, Brambilla C, Varini E, Sigbjörnsson R (2012) Probabilistic analysis of macroseismic fields: Iceland case study. In: 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon

  • Rotondi R, Varini E, Brambilla C (2015) Probabilistic modelling of macroseismic attenuation and forecast of damage scenarios. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9781-7

  • Rovida A, Camassi R, Gasperini P, Stucchi M (eds) (2011) CPTI11, the 2011 version of the Parametric Catalogue of Italian Earthquakes. Milano, Bologna. http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/CPTI. doi:10.6092/INGV.IT-CPTI11

  • Sabatini V (1913) Note sul terremoto di Linera dell’8 maggio 1914. Boll R Comit Geol It, s. V, XLIV(3):245–293

  • Sabatini V (1915) Considerazioni sismologiche a proposito del terremoto di Linera dell’8 maggio 1914. Boll. R. Comit. Geol. It XLV(3–4):197–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollo S, Prestifilippo M, Spata G, D’Agostino M, Coltelli M (2009) Monitoring and forecasting Etna volcanic plumes. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1573–1585. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-1573-2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollo S, Coltelli M, Bonadonna C, Del Carlo P (2013) Tephra hazard assessment at Mt. Etna (Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:3221–3233. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-3221-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicali S, Barbano MS, D’Amico S, Azzaro R (2014) Characterization of seismicity at Mt. Etna volcano (Italy) by inter-event time distribution. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 270:1–9

  • Syner-G project—Deliverable D3.3 (2010) Fragility functions for electric power system elements. http://www.vce.at/SYNER-G/

  • Syner-G project—Deliverable D3.4 (2010) Fragility functions for gas and oil system networks. http://www.vce.at/SYNER-G/

  • UPStrat-MAFA (2012–2013) Urban disaster prevention strategies using MAcroseismic Fields and FAult Sources (UPStrat-MAFA—EU Project Num. 23031/2011/613486/SUB/A5), DG ECHO Unit A5. Project Web page http://upstrat-mafa.ov.ingv.it/UPStrat/

  • Van der Borst M, Schoonakker H (2001) An overview of PSA importance measures. Reliab Eng Saf Syst 72:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zonno G, Rotondi R, Brambilla C (2009) Mining macroseismic fields to estimate the probability distribution of the intensity at site. BSSA 98(5):2876–2892. doi:10.1785/0120090042

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was co-financed by the EU—Civil Protection Financial Instrument, in the framework the European project ‘Urban Disaster Prevention Strategies using Macroseismic Fields and Fault Sources’ (UPStrat-MAFA), Grant Agreement No. 23031/2011/613486/SUB/A5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Meroni.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 9, 10, 11 and 12.

Table 9 Classification of the damage to bridges
Table 10 Classification of damage to electricity power stations
Table 11 Classification of damage to natural gas pressure reduction and measurement stations
Table 12 Classification of damage to explosives storage and inflammable liquid tanks

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meroni, F., Zonno, G., Azzaro, R. et al. The role of the urban system dysfunction in the assessment of seismic risk in the Mt. Etna area (Italy). Bull Earthquake Eng 14, 1979–2008 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9780-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9780-8

Keywords

Navigation