Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic response of poro-elastic seabed and composite breakwater under strong earthquake loading

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The marine structures in offshore area, such as composite breakwater, are generally vulnerable to the strong seismic wave propagating through their seabed foundation. There are a lot of failure examples during the strong earthquake events in the world in the past 20 years. However, attention given to the seismic response of marine structures under strong seismic wave is limited. In this study, taking the dynamic Biot’s equation “u − p” as the governing equation for porous seabed foundation, the seismic response of a composite breakwater and its porous seabed foundation under the seismic wave recorded in the Japan 311 off the pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (M L = 9.0) is investigated using a FEM numerical model. The numerical results indicate that the seismic response of composite breakwater is very strong in the earthquake process. The amplification of the input seismic wave occurs both in seabed foundation and composite breakwater; and this amplification is positively related to the buried depth of points. The horizontal seismic response is much strong than the vertical seismic response. The seismic wave induced excess pore pressure and effective stresses in seabed foundation vibrates; the vibration amplitude is also positively related to the buried depth of points. Under strong seismic loading, the surface region of seabed foundation could liquefy. The parametric study shows that the young’s modulus of seabed foundation has significant effect on the seismic response of composite breakwater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arablouei A, Gharabaghi ARM, Ghalandarzadeh A, Abedi K, Ishibashi I (2011) Effects of seawater-structure-soil interaction on seismic performance of caisson-type quay wall. Comput Struct 89(23–24): 2439–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byme P (1991) A cyclic shear-volume coupling and pore-pressure model for sand. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, vol 1.24, pp 47–55

  • Chan AHC (1988) A unified finite element solution to static and dynamic problems of geomechanics. PhD thesis, University of Wales, Swansea Wales

  • Chen B-F (2000) Dynamic responses of coastal structures during earthquakes including sedimentseastructure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20(5–8): 445–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B-F, Huang C-F (2002) Hydrodynamic forces on concrete sea wall and breakwater during earthquakes: effects of bottom sediment layers and back-fill soil. Ocean Eng 29(7): 783–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cihan K, Yuksel Y (2011) Deformation of rubble-mound breakwaters under cyclic loads. Coast Eng 58(6): 528–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S, Kameoka T (1993) Finite element analysis of earthquakeinduced damage to anchored sheet pile quay walls. Soils Found 33(1): 71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarian Y, Alielahi H, Abdollahi AS, Vakili B (2010) Seismic numerical simulation of breakwater on a liquefiable layer: IRAN LNG port. Electron J Geotech Eng 15 D: 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona MG, Zienkiewicz OC (1985) A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 3: the beta-m method, a generalisation of the Newmark scheme. Int J Numer Methods Eng 21: 1345–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katopodi I, Iosifidou K (2004) Impact of the lefkada earthquake 14-08-2003 on marine works and coastal regions. In: Proceedings of 7th panhellenic geographical conference, Mytilene, Greece, pp 363–370

  • Kiara A, Memos C, Tsiachris A (2004) Some practical aspects on the seismic behavior of rubble-mound breakwaters. In: Ports 2001: America’s ports—gateways to the global economy—proceedings of the ports 2001 conference, vol 108, pp 1–10

  • Memos C, Bouckovalas G, Tsiachris A (2000) Stability of rubble-mound breakwaters under seismic action. In: Coastal engineering 2000—proceedings of the 27th international conference on coastal engineering, ICCE 2000, vol 276, pp 1585–1598

  • Memos C, Protonotarios JN (1993) Patras breakwater failure due to seismic loading. In: Proceedings of the coastal engineering conference, vol 3, pp 3343–3356

  • Memos CD, Kiara A, Pavlidis E (2003) Coupled seismic response analysis of rubble-mound breakwaters. Proc Inst Civ Eng Water Marit Eng 156(1): 23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohajeri M, Ichii K, Tamura T (2004) Experimental study on sliding block concept for caisson walls. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 130(3): 134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 85: 67–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Okusa S (1985) Wave-induced stress in unsaturated submarine sediments. Geotechnique 35(4): 517–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou J (2009) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of interaction between soil and pore fluid. PhD thesis, Universtity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

  • Ozaki R, Nagao T (2004) Verification of seismic stability of caisson type breakwater. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Paper no. 0588

  • Sugano T, Kaneko H, Yamamoto S (1999) Damage to port and harbor facilities. The 1999 Ji-Ji earthquake, taiwan, investigation into the damage to civil engineering structures. In: Japan Society of Civil Engineers, chap 5, pp 51–57

  • Sumer BM, Ansal A, Cetin KO, Damgaard J, Gunbak AR, Hansen NEO, Sawicki A, Synolakis CE, Yalciner AC, Yuksel Y, Zen K (2007) Earthquake-induced liquefaction around marine structures. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 133(1): 55–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumer BM, Kaya A, Hansen ONE (2002) Impact of liquefaction on coastal structures in the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake. In: Proceedings of the international offshore and polar engineering conference, vol 12, pp 504–511

  • Tsai CP, Lee TL (1995) Standing wave induced pore pressure in a porous seabed. Ocean Eng 22(6): 505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westergaard HM (1933) Water pressure on dams during earthquakes. Trans ASCE 98(2):418–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie LA (1986) The chile earthquake of March 3, 1985. Earthq Spectra 2(2): 293–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young Y, White J, Xiao H, Borja R (2009) Liquefaction potential of coastal slopes induced by solitary waves. Acta Geotechnica 4: 17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuksel Y, Cetin KO, Ozguven O, Isik NS, Cevik E, Sumer BM (2004) Seismic response of a rubble mound breakwater in Turkey. Proc Inst Civ Eng Marit Eng 157(4): 151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Chan AHC, Pastor M, Schrefler BA, Shiomi T (1999) Computational geomechanics with special reference to earthquake engineering. Wiley, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Chang CT, Bettess P (1980) Drained, undrained, consolidating and dynamic behaviour assumptions in soils. Geotechnique 30(4): 385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Engineering Geomechanics, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China

    Jianhong Ye

  2. Division of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK

    Jianhong Ye

Authors
  1. Jianhong Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianhong Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ye, J. Seismic response of poro-elastic seabed and composite breakwater under strong earthquake loading. Bull Earthquake Eng 10, 1609–1633 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9365-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9365-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation