Skip to main content
Log in

The Logical Basis of the Tractarian Ontology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the relation between logic and ontology. In particular, it demonstrates how classical logical theory can clarify the ontological part of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. To this end, the work examines the adequacy of a formal system that was devised by the Polish logician, mathematician and philosopher Roman Suszko (1919–1979) as a model for the Tractatus. Following a brief explanation of the Tractarian ontology, the main ideas of Suszko’s system and its philosophical significance will be considered. The latter will be illustrated in the context of central Tractarian concepts. Finally, two implications for a better understanding of the Tractarian ontology will be pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All citations of the Tractatus are from the translation by David F. Pears and Brian F. McGuinness (Wittgenstein 1974).

  2. Suszko (1977, p. 379) reports that in 1923 Alfred Tarski had already proved the independence of the Fregean axiom in his doctoral dissertation.

  3. For a comprehensive bibliography of other formal reconstructions and diverse investigations pertaining to the Tractarian ontology see Jerzy Perzanowski (1990, p. 197).

  4. Wolniewicz follows Suszko’s later practice of using the symbol ‘≡‘ for both the identity connective and predicate.

  5. Stenius uses the terms ‘state of affairs’ and ‘atomic state of affairs’ instead of ‘situation’ and ‘state of affairs’ respectively.

  6. Following Suszko, as a convention, universal quantifiers will usually be omitted in the formulation of theorems.

  7. For his extensional theory of modality see Suszko (1971).

  8. The argument was translated for me from Polish by the courtesy of Prof. Jan Woleński.

  9. It should be noted that the parallelism between inference in the context of language and inference in the context of the world is essentially different from the parallelism between, for example, word and object.

  10. Cf. Paul R. Halmos (1963, p. 5).

  11. Space does not permit me to consider other Tractarian concepts that are clarified by Suszko’s formal system: logical space, logical place, the real world and possible worlds. This will be addressed elsewhere.

References

  • Black M (1964) A companion to Wittgenstein’s ‘Tractatus’. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Church A (1956) Introduction to mathematical logic, vol. 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege G (1994) On sense and reference. Rpt in: Harnish RM (ed) Basic topics in the philosophy of language. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp 142–160

  • Halmos PR (1963) Lectures on Boolean Algebras. Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe EJ (1995) Ontology. In: Honderich T (ed) The oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 634–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Omyła M (1996) A formal ontology of situations. In: Poli R, Simons P (eds) Formal ontology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 173–187

  • Perzanowski J (1990) Towards Post-Tractatus ontology. In: Haler R, Brandl J (eds) Wittgenstein—Towards a re-evaluation. Proceedings of the 14th international Wittgenstein-Symposium: centenary celebration, Kirchberg am Wechsel, August 1989, vol. 1. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp 185–99

  • Pitcher G (1964) The philosophy of Wittgenstein. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli R, Simons P (1996) Foreword. In: Poli R, Simons P (eds) Formal ontology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp vii-viii

  • Russell B (1985) The philosophy of logical atomism. Pears D (ed) Open Court, La Sale

  • Simons P (1981) Logical and ontological independence in the Tractatus. In: Morscher E, Stranzinger R (eds) Ethics: foundations, problems, and applications. Proceedings of the 5th international Wittgenstein symposium, Kirchberg am Wechsel, August 1980. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp 464–467

  • Stenius E (1960) Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: a critical exposition of its main lines of thought. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Suszko R (1975) Abolition of the Fregean axiom. In: Parikh R (ed) Logic Coloquium: symposium on logic, Boston, 1972–73. Lecture notes in mathematics, vol 453. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 169–239

  • Suszko R (1971) Identity connective and modality. Studia Logica 27:7–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suszko R (1968a) Non-Fregean logic and theories. Analele Universitatii Bucuresti, Acta Logica 11:105–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Suszko R (1968) Ontology in the Tractatus of L. Wittgenstein. Notre Dame J Formal Logic 9:7–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suszko R (1977) The Fregean axiom and Polish mathematical logic in the 1920s. Studia Logica 36:377–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1995) Ludwig Wittgensten: Cambridge letters. In: McGuinness B, von Wright GH (eds). Blackwell, Oxford

  • Wittgenstein L (1958) Philosophical investigations. Anscombe GEM (trans), 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

  • Wittgenstein L (1974) Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. Pears DF, McGuinness B (trans), rev. edn. Routledge, London

  • Wittgenstein L (1980) Wittgenstein’s lectures: Cambridge, 1930–1932. Lee D (ed) University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Wolniewicz B (1968) Rzeczy i fakty. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszwa

  • Wolniewicz B (1984) Suszko: a reminiscence. Studia Logica 43:317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natan Berber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berber, N. The Logical Basis of the Tractarian Ontology. Axiomathes 17, 185–196 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-007-9015-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-007-9015-y

Keywords

Navigation