Skip to main content
Log in

Fundamental Principles of the Formation of an Efficient Fuel-Cycle Structure for Nuclear Power

  • ARTICLES
  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

The growth prospects for nuclear power are examined: impeding and driving forces. The main problem facing nuclear power today is the management of spent fuel and wastes. Eventually, it will become economically inexpedient to store spent fuel; the natural solution is to reprocess spent fuel, extract the fi ssile isotopes, and recycle it in thermal or fast reactors. Since the fast-reactor fraction in the current system is trivial and the situation will remain the same in the near- and medium-term futures, a variant of plutonium recycling in thermal reactors with a different fuel arrangement is examined. It is shown that a heterogeneous fuel arrangement can give a 10-fold reduction of the radiation load in reprocessing enterprises. Different setups are compared in terms of the potential danger presented by spent-fuel reprocessing. The advantages of the thorium fuel cycle are examined from the standpoint of radiation and environmental safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. D. Davidenko and S. V. Tsibul’skii, “Effi cient methods of burning power-grade plutonium in VVER,” At. Énerg., 118, No. 3, 134–136 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. G. Kodochigov, Yu. P. Sukharev, E. V. Marova, et al., “Computational-experimental investigations of the neutronphysical characteristics of the core of the GT-MHR reactor,” At. Énerg., 102, No. 1, 63–68 (2007).

  3. Yu. P. Sukharev and P. A. Fomichenko, “GT-MHR project high-temperature reactor neutronic issues and ways to resolve them,” Nucl. Eng. Design, 271, 392–396 (2014).

  4. B. V. Kuteev, E. A. Azizov, and P. N. Alexeev, “Development of DEMO-FNS tokamak for fusion and hybrid technologies,” Nucl. Fus., 55, No. 7, 073035 (2015).

  5. E. P. Velikhov, M. V. Koval’chuk, E. A. Azizov, et al., “Thermonuclear source of neutrons for the production of nuclear fuel,” At. Énerg., 114, No. 3, 160–165 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. M. Feinberg, “Breeder with gaseous coolant, as an alternative to metallic coolant: ideology of hard and soft spectra,” in: Distinguished Scientists of the Kurchatov Institute, Moscow (2011), pp. 135–165.

  7. E. A. Andrianova, V. D. Davidenko, and V. F. Tsibul’skii, “Prospective fuel loads of reactors for a closed fuel cycle of nuclear power,” At. Énerg., 118, No. 5, 243–247 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 120, No. 5, pp. 243–249, May, 2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsibul’skii, V.F., Andrianova, E.A., Davidenko, V.D. et al. Fundamental Principles of the Formation of an Efficient Fuel-Cycle Structure for Nuclear Power. At Energy 120, 299–304 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0134-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0134-7

Navigation