Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of the fast and CSM methods for analyzing uncertainties in hydraulic-shock modeling

  • Scientific and Technical Communications
  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. E. Wylie, V. Streeter, and L. Suo, Fluid Transients in Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, and P.-S. Chan, “A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output,” Technometrics, 41, No. 1, 39–56 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Kaliatka, E. Uspuras, and M. Vaisnoras, “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of parameters affecting water hammer pressure wave behavior,” Kerntechnik, 71, No. 5–6, 270–278 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Kaliatka, E. Uspuras, and M. Vaisnoras, “Benchmarking analysis of water hammer effect using RELAP5 code and development of RBMK-1500 reactor main circulation circuit model,” An. Nucl. Energy, 34, No. 1–2, 1–12 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. G. Glaeser, “Uncertainty evaluation of thermal-hydraulic code results,” in: Proc. Int. Meeting on “Best-Estimate” Methods in Nuclear Installation Safety Analysis (BE-2000), Washington DC, USA (2000), p. 20.

  6. R. Cukier, C. Fortuin, K. Shuler, et al., “Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. 1. Theory,” J. Chem. Phys., 59, 3873–3878 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. I. M. Sobol, “On the evaluating sensitivity of nonlinear mathematical models,” Mat. Model., 2, No. 1, 112–118 (1990).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Saltelli and I. M. Sobol, “Analysis of the sensitivity of nonlinear mathematical models: numerical experiments,” ibid., 7, No. 11, 16–28 (1995).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. I. M. Sobol, “Global sensitivity indicators for studying nonlinear mathematical models,” ibid., 17, No. 9, 43–52 (2005).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Sinclair, Response to the PSACOIN Level S Exercise. PSACOIN Level S Untercomparison, Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD (1993).

  11. R. Bolado-Lavin,W. Castaings, and S. Tarantola, “Contribution to the sample mean plot for graphical and numerical sensitivity analysis,” Reliability Eng. Design, 94, No. 6, 1041–1049 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. SIMLAB. Version 2.2. User Manual. European Commission Joint Research Center, IPSC, Ispra (2005).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lithuania Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania

    E. Uspuras, A. Kaliatka, V. Kopustinskas & M. Vaisnoras

Authors
  1. E. Uspuras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Kaliatka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Kopustinskas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Vaisnoras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 171–176, September, 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uspuras, E., Kaliatka, A., Kopustinskas, V. et al. Use of the fast and CSM methods for analyzing uncertainties in hydraulic-shock modeling. At Energy 109, 213–220 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-011-9347-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-011-9347-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation