Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Causal Effects of Relational Security and Insecurity on Condom Use Attitudes and Acquisition Behavior

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on attachment and condom use has been limited to correlational studies of self-report measures, yielding inconsistent results. Here, we examined the causal effects of attachment priming on self-reported condom use attitudes and an observational measure of condom acquisition behavior. In three experiments, participants were exposed to one of three attachment primes (security, anxiety, or avoidance) or a control prime. For Study 1, participants in the security and anxiety conditions preferred condom non-use to a greater extent, compared to participants in the avoidance condition. This effect was replicated in Study 2, and was mediated by perceptions of sexual health threat. In Study 3, the effect of security priming on condom acquisition behavior was eliminated through the use of a framing manipulation, though the effect of primed attachment on condom use attitudes was not significant. A meta-analysis, however, revealed that the predicted effects of attachment priming were consistent across the three studies, supporting the role of attachment in evaluations of condom use. Priming attachment security or anxiety leads participants to perceive their sexual partners as less of a sexual health threat, resulting in a devaluation of condom use. Primed security also reduced condom acquisition behavior, though this negative effect eliminated by framing condoms as protecting a partner’s sexual health. Overall, these studies suggest that relational factors, such as attachment, require greater consideration when studying sexual health and designing interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For all three studies, we conducted χ 2 tests to examine whether rates of non-compliant responses differed by attachment priming condition. All tests were non-significant, indicating comparable rates of non-compliant responses in each condition.

  2. A confirmatory factor analysis by Sakaluk and Muehlenhard (2012) supported considering consistent condom use and condom non-use as distinct attitudinal objects.

  3. Results were similar when attitudes toward consistent condom use and condom non-use were analyzed as levels of repeated measures in a mixed 4 × 2 design. For the sake of simplicity, we have therefore presented the results of analyzing the difference scores.

  4. We also explored controlling for participants relationship status. Although relationship status was a significant predictor of condom use attitudes in Studies 1 and 2, it was not a significant predictor of number of condoms taken in Study 3, and more importantly, it did not substantively impact the pattern of effects we observed throughout Studies 1–3.

  5. We also explored whether attachment priming effects were moderated by measures of trait attachment style in portions of Studies 1 and 2 samples, but these interactions were not significant. However, as our focus was on primed and not measured attachment, our four-condition design was not optimally suited for testing these interactions; we return to this point in the discussion section on future research.

  6. Participants were told during debriefing that the number of condoms they took would be counted as a source of data. No participants indicated discomfort with this minor deception. Nevertheless, research assistants delayed the actual counting until participants left.

References

  • Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470114754.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albaracín, D., Gillette, J. C., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L. R., Durantini, M. R., & Ho, M. (2005). A test of major assumptions about behavior change: A comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 856–897. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albaracín, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142–161. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartz, J. A., & Lydon, J. E. (2004). Close relationships and the working self-concept: Implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1389–1401. doi:10.1177/0146167204264245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, L. J., & Berman, R. (2005). Adolescent relationships and condom use: Trust, love and commitment. AIDS and Behavior, 9, 211–222. doi:10.1007/s10461-005-3902-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, G. E., Simpson, J. A., Weisberg, Y. J., Barnea, E., & Assulin-Simhon, Z. (2012). Is it my overactive imagination? The effects of contextually activated attachment insecurity on sexual fantasies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 1131–1152. doi:10.1177/0265407512452978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F., & Sadava, S. (2002). Adult attachment and sexual behavior. Personal Relationships, 9, 191–204. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. S., Tschann, J. M., Ellen, J. M., & Flores, E. (2009). Infidelity, trust, and condom use among Latino youth in dating relationships. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 36, 227–231. doi:10.1097/QLQ.0b013e3181901cba.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high quality, data? Perspectives of Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnelley, K. B., & Rowe, A. C. (2007). Repeated priming of attachment security influences later views of self and relationships. Personal Relationships, 14, 307–320. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00156.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciesla, J. A., Roberts, J. E., & Hewitt, R. G. (2004). Adult attachment and high-risk sexual behavior among HIV-positive patients. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 108–124. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02539.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2002). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. J., & Gillath, O. (2012). Attachment, breakup strategies, and associated outcomes: The effects of security enhancement on the selection of breakup strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 210–222. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. L. (2002). Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 14, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. M., Dickson-Gómez, J., Hilario, H., & Weeks, M. R. (2009). A little thing called love: Condom use in high-risk primary heterosexual relationships. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41, 218–224. doi:10.1363/4121809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. doi:10.1177/0956797613504966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Czopp, A. M., Monteith, M. J., Zimmerman, R. S., & Lynam, D. R. (2004). Implicit attitudes as potential protection from risky sex: Predicting condom use with the IAT. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 227–236. doi:10.1080/01973533.2004.9646407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., & Vernon, M. L. (2004). Attachment style and subjective motivations for sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1076–1090. doi:10.1177/0146167204264794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dewitte, M. (2012). Different perspectives on the sex-attachment link: Towards an emotion-motivational account. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 105–124. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.576351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173–192. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2004). Emerging perspectives on distinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 116–119. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00287.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. M., & Coleman, E. (2004). Defining sexual health: A descriptive overview. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 189–195. doi:10.1023/B:ASEB.0000026619.95734.d5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, J. A., Kelly, L., Gallois, C., Peterson, C., & Terry, D. J. (1999). Attachment style, assertive communication and safer-sex behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1964–1983. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00159.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, J. A., Peterson, C., Gallois, C., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Attachment style as a predictor of sexual attitudes and behaviors in late adolescence. Psychology and Health, 14, 1105–1122. doi:10.1080/08870440008407370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, J. A., & Raphael, B. (1992). Adult attachment and sexuality: Implications for understanding risk behaviors for HIV infection. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 26, 399–407. doi:10.3109/00048679209072062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor-analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354. doi:10.1177/0146167200265007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., & Davis, K. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 131–144. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011a). The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures Questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 615–625. doi:10.1037/a0022898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Vicary, A. M., Brumbaugh, C. C., & Roisman, G. I. (2011b). Patterns of stability in adult attachment: An empirical test of two models of continuity and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 974–992. doi:10.1037/a0024150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, G. (2012). Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 151–156. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0227-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt, W. A., Kuyper, L., & Greunsven, G. (2003). Need for intimacy in relationships and motives for sex as determinants of adolescent condom use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 154–164. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00137-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillath, O., Hart, J., Noftle, E. E., & Stockdale, G. D. (2009). Development and validation of a state adult attachment measure (SAAM). Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 362–373. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillath, O., & Schachner, D. A. (2006). How do sexuality and attachment interrelate? Goals, motives, and strategies. In M. Mikulincer & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex (pp. 121–147). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillath, O., Selcuk, E., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Moving toward a secure attachment style: Can repeated security priming help? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1651–1666. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00120.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1996). Three pleasing ideas. American Psychologist, 51, 901–908. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.9.901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B. P., Fortenberry, J. D., Zimet, G. D., Blythe, M. J., & Orr, D. P. (2000). Partner-specific relationship characteristics and condom use among young people with sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 69–75. doi:10.1080/00224490009552022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kein, S. M., Barta, W. D., Zelenski, J. M., & Cothran, D. L. (2005). Why are you bringing up condoms now? The effects of message content on framing effects of condom use messages. Health Psychology, 24, 321–326. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, T. S., Milan, S., Westdahl, C., Lewis, J., Rising, S. S., Fletcher, R., & Ickovics, J. (2007). Avoidance, anxiety, and sex: The influence of romantic attachment on HIV-risk among pregnant women. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 299–311. doi:10.1007/s10461-006-9153-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (1997). Altering fate: Why the past does not predict the future. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, K. L., Johnson, B. T., & Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J. (2001). Heart versus reason in condom use: Implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behavior. Experimental Psychology, 48, 161–175. doi:10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477–507. doi:10.1007/s1058-007-9175-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53–152). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007a). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007b). Boosting attachment security to promote mental health, prosocial values, and inter-group tolerance. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 139–156. doi:10.1080/10478400701512646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Gillath, O., & Nitzberg, R. A. (2005). Attachment, caregiving, and altruism: Boosting attachment security increases compassion and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 817–839. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, M., Herbenick, D., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the united states. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(Suppl. 5), 266–276. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02017.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). The health belief model and preventative health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2, 354–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rye, B. J., Meaney, G. J., & Fisher, W. A. (2011). Sexual opinion survey. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (3rd ed., pp. 231–236). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk, J. K. (2014). Problems with recall-based attachment style priming paradigms: Exclusion criteria, sample bias, and reduced power. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 888–906. doi:10.1177/0265407513508728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk, J. K., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2012). Development and validation of parallel implicit and explicit measures of attitudes towards condom use and non-use. Paper presented at the Eastern and Midcontinent Joint Regional Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Bloomington, Indiana.

  • Schachner, D. A., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Attachment dimensions and sexual motives. Personal Relationships, 11, 179–195. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00077.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U. (2012). The ironic effect of significant effects on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods, 17, 551–566. doi:10.1037/a0029487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran, P., Abraham, C., & Orbell, S. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 90–132. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strachman, A., & Impett, E. A. (2009). Attachment orientations and daily condom use in dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 319–329. doi:10.1080/00224490802691801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UNAIDS: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. (2010). UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic: 2010. Retrieved from http://www.unaids.org/globalreport

  • Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2012). Social science methods for research on sexual and reproductive health. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2012/9789241503112_eng.pdf.

  • Xu, J. H., & Shrout, P. E. (2013). Assessing the reliability of change: A comparison of two measures of adult attachment. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 202–208. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Deerfield Hall Rm. 4098, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada

    John Kitchener Sakaluk

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

    Omri Gillath

Authors
  1. John Kitchener Sakaluk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Omri Gillath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Kitchener Sakaluk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakaluk, J.K., Gillath, O. The Causal Effects of Relational Security and Insecurity on Condom Use Attitudes and Acquisition Behavior. Arch Sex Behav 45, 339–352 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0618-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0618-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation