Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Scales and Sample Were Adequate for the Purpose: Reply to Lawrence’s (2014) Critique of My Taxometric Analysis of the Sexuality of Transsexual Women

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blanchard, R. (1989a). Method of the concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. Retrieved from http://www.genderpsychology.org/autogynephilia/male_gender_dysphoria/homosexual_transsexual.html.

  • Blanchard, R. (1989b). The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 616–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R. (1992). Nonmonotonic relation of autogynephilia and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 271–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R. (1993). Partial versus complete autogynephilia and gender dysphoria. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 19, 301–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R., & Collins, P. I. (1993). Men with sexual interest in transvestites, transsexuals, and she-males. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181, 570–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M., & Blanchard, R. (1996). Prostitution advertisements suggest association of transvestism and masochism. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22, 97–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, R. (1997). Male femaling: A grounded theory approach to cross-dressing and sex-changing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A. A. (2014). Veale’s (2014) critique of Blanchard’s typology was invalid. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1679–1683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, J., Haslam, N., & Ruscio, A. M. (2006). Introduction to the taxometric method: A practical guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serano, J. M. (2010). The case against autogynephilia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 12, 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veale, J. F. (2014). Evidence against a typology: A taxometric analysis of the sexuality of male-to-female transsexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1177–1186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veale, J. F., Clarke, D. E., & Lomax, T. C. (2008). Sexuality of male-to-female transsexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 586–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veale, J. F., Lomax, T. C., & Clarke, D. E. (2010). The identity-defence model of gender-variant development. International Journal of Transgenderism, 12, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada

    Jaimie F. Veale

Authors
  1. Jaimie F. Veale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaimie F. Veale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veale, J.F. The Scales and Sample Were Adequate for the Purpose: Reply to Lawrence’s (2014) Critique of My Taxometric Analysis of the Sexuality of Transsexual Women. Arch Sex Behav 44, 1757–1759 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0579-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0579-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation