Abstract
The current study investigated sexual initiations within the framework of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1991; Ajzen & Madden, 1986). Male and female daters in heterosexual dating relationships completed an online survey that assessed their sexual relationship with their partner and the TPB components (perceptions of social norms, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and intentions). The TPB was supported for both men and women in that, as predicted, the more an individual perceived that important others would approve of them initiating sexual activities with their partner, the more positive their evaluations were of the outcomes of initiating, and the more confident they were in their ability to initiate, the stronger were their initiation intentions. In turn, stronger sexual initiation intentions were associated with more frequent initiation behaviors. Compared to women, men initiated more frequently, had stronger sexual initiation intentions, and perceived more positive social norms regarding initiation; men and women did not differ in their attitudes toward sexual initiation or in their perceived behavioral control. Both men and women who reported initiating more frequently and perceived their partner as initiating more frequently reported greater sexual satisfaction. These results are discussed in terms of the utility of the TPB for understanding sexual initiations and the role of the traditional sexual script in initiation-related cognitions and behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/tpb.html.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4.
Anderson, P. B., & Aymami, R. (1993). Reports of female initiation of sexual contact: Male and female differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 335–343. doi:10.1007/BF01542122.
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. doi:10.1348/014466601164939.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Basen-Engquist, K., & Parcel, G. S. (1992). Attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy: A model of adolescents’ HIV-related sexual risk behavior. Health Education Quarterly, 19, 263–277.
Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5.
Blanc, A. K. (2001). The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: An examination of the evidence. Studies in Family Planning, 32, 189–213. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00189.x.
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: William Morrow.
Brener, N. D., Eaton, D. K., Kann, L., Grunbaum, J., Gross, L. A., Kyle, T. M., & Ross, J. G. (2006). The association of survey setting and mode with self-reported health risk behaviors among high school students. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 354–374.
Brody, S., & Costa, R. M. (2009). Satisfaction (sexual, life, relationship, and mental health) is associated directly with penile and vaginal intercourse, but inversely with other sexual behavior frequencies. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 1947–1954. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01303.x.
Byers, E. S. (1995). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8(1), 7–25. doi:10.1300/J056v08n01_02.
Byers, E. S., & Heinlein, L. (1989). Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 210–231.
Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 150–158.
Fischtein, D. S., Herold, E. S., & Desmarais, S. (2007). How much does gender explain in sexual attitudes and behaviors? A survey of Canadian adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 451–461. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9157-9.
Fishbein, M. (2000). The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care, 12, 273–278. doi:10.1080/09540120050042918.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gossmann, I., Julien, D., Mathieu, M., & Chartrand, E. (2003). Determinants of sex initiation frequencies and sexual satisfaction in long-term couples’ relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 12, 169–181.
Greer, A. E., & Buss, D. M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 185–201.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.
Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young men and women communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 258–272.
Hust, S. J. T., Brown, J. D., & L’Engle, K. L. (2008). Boys will be boys and girls better be prepared: An analysis of the rare sexual health messages in young adolescents’ media. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 3–23.
Jemmott, L. S., Jemmott, J. B., & Villarruel, A. M. (2002). Predicting intentions and condom use among Latino college students. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 13, 59–69.
Jesser, C. J. (1978). Male responses to direct verbal sexual initiatives of females. Journal of Sex Research, 14, 118–128.
LaPlante, M. N., McCormick, N., & Brannigan, G. G. (1980). Living the sexual script: College students’ views of influence in sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 16, 338–355.
Lawrance, K., Byers, E. S., & Cohen, J. (2011). Interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction questionnaire. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 525–530). Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge.
Lawrance, K., Taylor, D., & Byers, E. S. (1996). Differences in men’s and women’s global, sexual, and ideal-sexual expressiveness and instrumentality. Sex Roles, 34, 337–357. doi:10.1007/BF01547806.
Littleton, H. L., Axsom, D., & Yoder, M. (2006). Priming of consensual and nonconsensual sexual scripts: An experimental test of the role of scripts in rape attributions. Sex Roles, 54, 557–563. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9017-z.
McCormick, N. B. (1979). Come-ons and put-offs: Unmarried students’ strategies for having and avoiding sexual intercourse. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 194–211. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1979.tb00708.x.
McCormick, N. B. (1987). Sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 2, 3–27.
McCormick, N. B. (2010). Preface to sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 91–95. doi:10.1080/14681990903563707.
McCormick, N. B., Brannigan, G. G., & LaPlante, M. N. (1984). Social desirability in the bedroom: Role of approval motivation in sexual relationships. Sex Roles, 11(3–4), 303–314. doi:10.1007/BF00287522.
McNulty, J. K., & Fisher, T. D. (2008). Gender differences in response to sexual expectancies and changes in sexual frequency: A short-term longitudinal study of sexual satisfaction in newly married couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 229–240. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9176-1.
Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script based approach. In B. R. Burleson & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 49–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 361–368.
Molla, M., Åstrøm, A. N., & Brehane, Y. (2007). Applicability of the theory of planned behavior to intended and self-reported condom use in a rural Ethiopian population. AIDS Care, 19, 425–431. doi:10.1080/09540120600722692.
Muñoz-Silva, A., Sánchez-García, M., Nunes, C., & Martins, A. (2007). Gender differences in condom use prediction with theory of reasoned action and planned behavior: The role of self-efficacy and control. AIDS Care, 19, 1177–1181. doi:10.1080/09540120701402772.
Ortiz-Torres, B., Williams, S. P., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Urban women’s gender scripts: Implications for HIV prevention. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 1–17. doi:10.1080/713804639.
O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 435–446. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00149.x.
Perper, T., & Weis, D. L. (1987). Proceptive and rejective strategies of U.S. and Canadian college women. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 455–480.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2001). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved from http://www.people.ku.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
Purnine, D. M., & Carey, M. P. (1997). Interpersonal communication and sexual adjustment: The roles of understanding and agreement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 1017–1025. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.65.6.1017.
Santilla, P., Wager, I., Witting, K., Harlaar, N., Jern, P., Johansson, A., … Sandnabba, K. (2008). Discrepancies between sexual desire and sexual activity: Gender differences and associations with relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 34, 31–44. doi:10.1080/00926230701620548.
Seal, D. W., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 5, 295–319. doi:10.1080/136910501171698.
Sheeran, P., & Abraham, C. (2003). Mediator of moderators: Temporal stability of intention and the intention-behavior relation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 205–215. doi:10.1177/0146167202239046.
Simms, D. C., & Byers, E. S. (2009). Interpersonal perceptions of ideal sexual frequency within dating partners. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 18(1–2), 15–25.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Taylor, J. F., Rosen, R. C., & Leiblum, S. R. (1994). Self-report assessment of female sexual function: Psychometric evaluation of the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 627–643. doi:10.1007/BF01541816.
Treboux, D., & Busch-Rossnagel, N. (1990). Social network influences on adolescent sexual attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 175–189. doi:10.1177/074355489052005.
Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867–873.
Van De Ven, M. O. O., Engels, R. C. M. E., Otten, R., & Van Den Eijnden, R. J. J. M. (2007). A longitudinal test of the theory of planned behavior predicting smoking onset among asthmatic and non-asthmatic adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 435–445. doi:10.1007/s10865-007-9119-2.
Vannier, S., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2008). The feasibility and acceptability of handheld computers in a prospective diary study of adolescent sexual behavior. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 17, 183–192.
Villarruel, A. M., Jemmott, J. B. I., I. I. I., Jemmott, L. S., & Ronis, D. L. (2004). Predictors of sexual intercourse and condom use intentions among Spanish-dominant Latino youth: A test of the planned behavior theory. Nursing Research, 53, 172–181. doi:10.1097/00006199-200405000-00004.
Webb, P. M., Zimet, G. D., Fortenberry, J. D., & Blythe, M. J. (1999). Comparability of a computer-assisted versus written method for collecting health behavior information from adolescent patients. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24, 383–388.
Wiederman, M. W. (1999). Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 59–66.
Zilbergeld, B., & Zilbergeld, G. (2004). Better than ever: Love and sex at midlife. Norwalk, CT: Crown House Publishing Limited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simms, D.C., Byers, E.S. Heterosexual Daters’ Sexual Initiation Behaviors: Use of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Arch Sex Behav 42, 105–116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9994-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9994-7