Predictors of Heterosexual Casual Sex Among Young Adults
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Casual sex is often associated with the young adult stage in the life course. Most recent research on the prevalence, motives, and consequences of heterosexual casual sex has relied on samples of college students, yet students are only a small and advantaged subset of the young adult population. The current study drew on the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study, which was collected in 2006–2007 and included young adults (ages 18–24 years) whose trajectories reflected a wider spectrum of educational experiences (N = 1,023). We moved beyond prior work by examining both frequency and type of heterosexual casual sex: lifetime vaginal, lifetime oral, and recent vaginal sex. We found that young adults enrolled or who graduated from 4-year educational institutions reported fewer casual sex partners on all three measures compared to participants without a high school degree and those with some college experience. Sexual attitudes were key factors mediating the association between educational status and casual sex behavior. These results indicate that programs aimed at encouraging healthy sexual behavior should target individuals who are at risk of not graduating high school because they are at greatest risk of frequent casual sex partners.
- Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
- Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. CrossRef
- Bailey, J. A., Fleming, C. B., Henson, J. N., Catalano, R. F., & Haggerty, K. P. (2008). Sexual risk behavior 6 months post-high school: Associations with college attendance, living with a parent, and prior risk behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 573–579. CrossRef
- Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. CrossRef
- Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). College enrollment and work activity of 2009 high school graduates. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/hsgec.pdf.
- Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Conley, T. (2011). Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 309–332. CrossRef
- Cuffee, J. J., Hallfors, D. D., & Waller, M. W. (2007). Racial and gender differences in adolescent sexual attitudes and longitudinal associations with coital debut. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 19–26. CrossRef
- Eisenberg, M. E., Ackard, D. M., Resnick, M. D., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2009). Casual sex and psychological health among young adults: Is having “friends with benefits” emotionally damaging? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41, 231–237. CrossRef
- England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2007). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The gendered society reader (pp. 531–547). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Furstenberg, F. F. (2008). The intersections of social class and the transition to adulthood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 119, 1–10. CrossRef
- Giordano, P., Longmore, M., Manning, W., & Northcutt, M. (2009). Adolescent identities and sexual behavior: An examination of Anderson’s “player” hypothesis. Social Forces, 87, 1813–1844. CrossRef
- Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. CrossRef
- Lyons, H., Manning, W., Longmore, M., & Giordano, P. (2010). A developmental perspective on the role of gender and social context of casual sex behavior. Working paper 2010-10, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green, OH.
- Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- MacKinnon, D. (2008). Introduction to statistical medication analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Manning, W., Longmore, M., & Giordano, P. (2005). Adolescents’ involvement in non-romantic sexual activity. Social Science Research, 34, 384–407. CrossRef
- Manning, W., Longmore, M., & Giordano, P. (2006). Hooking-up: The relationship contexts of “nonrelationship” sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 459–483. CrossRef
- Meier, A., & Allen, G. (2008). Intimate relationship development during the transition to adulthood: Differences by social class. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 119, 25–39. CrossRef
- Mosher, W. D., Chandra, A., & Jones, J. (2005). Sexual behavior and selected health measures: Men and women 15–44 years of age, United States, 2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Advance data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 362. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad362.pdf.
- National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. (2009). Unplanned pregnancy and community colleges. Retrieved from http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/resources/pdf/briefly-unplanned-pregnancy-and-community-colleges.pdf.
- Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663. CrossRef
- Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. CrossRef
- Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. CrossRef
- Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. (2011). Gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: A review of meta-analytic results and large datasets. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 149–165. CrossRef
- Raley, R. K., Crissey, S., & Muller, C. (2007). Of sex and romance: Late adolescent relationships and young adult union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1210–1226. CrossRef
- Regnerus, M., & Uecker, J. (2011). Premarital sex in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Seffrin, P., Giordano, P., Manning, W., & Longmore, M. (2012). Socioeconomic disadvantage, peer and romantic relationships, and the process of criminal desistance. Working paper 2012-02, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green, OH.
- Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60. CrossRef
- Snyder, M., Simpson, J. A., & Gangestand, S. (1986). Personality and sexual relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 181–190. CrossRef
- Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Achieves of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1173–1181. CrossRef
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). American community survey [table B14004]. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Current population survey [table MS-2]. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/.
- Predictors of Heterosexual Casual Sex Among Young Adults
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 42, Issue 4 , pp 585-593
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Casual sex
- Oral sex
- Young adults
- Education differentials
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Sociology/Anthropology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA
- 2. Department of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA