Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 725–740

Sexual Well-Being: A Comparison of U.S. Black and White Women in Heterosexual Relationships

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10508-010-9679-z

Cite this article as:
Bancroft, J., Long, J.S. & McCabe, J. Arch Sex Behav (2011) 40: 725. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9679-z

Abstract

In the United States, considerable attention has been directed to sexual behaviors of black and white adolescents, particularly age at first sexual experience and the prevalence of teenage pregnancies. More limited attention has been paid to comparing established sexual relationships in these two racial groups. In this study, we used a national probability sample to compare black (n = 251) and white (n = 544) American women, aged 20–65 years, who were in an established heterosexual relationship of at least 6 months duration. We focused on two aspects of their sexual well-being; how a woman evaluated (1) her sexual relationship and (2) her own sexuality. A range of possible determinants of sexual well-being, including demographic factors, physical and mental health, and aspects of the women’s recent sexual experiences, were also assessed using Telephone-Audio-Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (T-ACASI). We found no significant difference between black and white women in their evaluation of their sexual relationships nor in the independent variables that were correlated with this evaluation. Black women, however, evaluated their own sexuality more positively than white women. In examining the correlates of this evaluation, a woman’s rating of her own sexual attractiveness proved to be the strongest predictor, with black women rating themselves significantly more sexually attractive than did the white women. Overall, these findings were consistent with previous findings that, compared to white women, black women in the United States have higher self-esteem and tend towards more independence and individualism.

Keywords

Sexual well-beingWomenHeterosexual relationshipsEthnicitySexual attractiveness

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Bancroft
    • 1
    • 5
  • J. Scott Long
    • 2
    • 3
  • Janice McCabe
    • 4
  1. 1.The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and ReproductionIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of StatisticsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of SociologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  5. 5.HorspathUK