Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Infants’ Preferences for Toys, Colors, and Shapes: Sex Differences and Similarities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Girls and boys differ in their preferences for toys such as dolls and trucks. These sex differences are present in infants, are seen in non-human primates, and relate, in part, to prenatal androgen exposure. This evidence of inborn influences on sex-typed toy preferences has led to suggestions that object features, such as the color or the shape of toys, may be of intrinsically different interest to males and females. We used a preferential looking task to examine preferences for different toys, colors, and shapes in 120 infants, ages 12, 18, or 24 months. Girls looked at dolls significantly more than boys did and boys looked at cars significantly more than girls did, irrespective of color, particularly when brightness was controlled. These outcomes did not vary with age. There were no significant sex differences in infants’ preferences for different colors or shapes. Instead, both girls and boys preferred reddish colors over blue and rounded over angular shapes. These findings augment prior evidence of sex-typed toy preferences in infants, but suggest that color and shape do not determine these sex differences. In fact, the direction of influence could be the opposite. Girls may learn to prefer pink, for instance, because the toys that they enjoy playing with are often colored pink. Regarding within sex differences, as opposed to differences between boys and girls, both boys and girls preferred dolls to cars at age 12-months. The preference of young boys for dolls over cars suggests that older boys’ avoidance of dolls may be acquired. Similarly, the sex similarities in infants’ preferences for colors and shapes suggest that any subsequent sex differences in these preferences may arise from socialization or cognitive gender development rather than inborn factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. J. (1987). An evaluation of color preference in early infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, G. M. (2003). An evolutionary perspective of sex-typed toy preferences: Pink, blue and the brain. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 7–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, G. M. (2006). Associations among gender-linked toy preferences, spatial ability, and digit ratios: Evidence from an eye-tracking analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 699–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, G. M., & Hines, M. (1994). Gender labels and play styles: Their relative contribution to children’s selection of playmates. Child Development, 65, 869–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, G. M., & Hines, M. (2002). Sex differences in response to children’s toys in nonhuman primates (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, G. M., Wilcox, R., & Woods, R. (2009). Sex differences in infants’ visual interest in toys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 427–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, J., Barclay, A. M., & Stevenson, L. A. (1988). The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 647–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, J., Woike, B. A., & Hyman, L. M. (1992). Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1050–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Ashwin, E., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., Hackett, G., & Hines, M. (2009). Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behavior in girls and in boys. Psychological Science, 20, 144–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17, 645–648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender-schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, S. A., & Hines, M. (1992). Early androgens are related to childhood sex-typed toy preferences. Psychological Science, 3, 203–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H. (1975). Qualities of color vision in infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 401–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H. (1985). Human infant color-vision and color perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 109–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldera, Y. M., & Sciaraffa, M. A. (1998). Parent-toddler play with feminine toys: Are all dolls the same? Sex Roles, 3, 657–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Shirley, L., Heywood, C., & Crook, C. (2000). Infants’ visual preference for sex-congruent babies, children, toys and activities: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S. W., Gervan, S., Fairbrother, C., Johnson, L. L., Owen-Anderson, A. F. H., Bradley, S. J., & Zucker, K. J. (2006). Sex-dimorphic color preference in children with gender identity disorder: A comparison to clinical and community controls. Sex Roles, 55, 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. B., DeLoache, J. S., & Strauss, M. S. (1979). Infant visual perception. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 393–438). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagot, B. I. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, K., & Rosen, E. (1949). A projective test of masculinity-femininity. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 247–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A., Pitchford, N., Mahony, L., & Davies, I. R. (2006, June). Color preferences in infancy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the XVth Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Westin Miyako, Kyoto, Japan.

  • Golombok, S., & Hines, M. (2002). Sex differences in social behavior. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 117–136). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golombok, S., Rust, J., Zervoulis, K., Croudace, T., Golding, J., & Hines, M. (2008). Developmental trajectories of sex-typed behavior in boys and girls: A longitudinal general population study of children aged 2.5–8 years. Child Development, 79, 1583–1593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W., Moore, S. G., & Sager, G. (1963). Avoidance of inappropriate sex-typing by young children. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 467–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassett, J. M., Siebert, E. R., & Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 359–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M. (2004). Brain gender. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M., & Alexander, G. M. (2008). Monkeys, girls, boys and toys: A confirmation [Letter to the editor]. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 478–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M., Golombok, S., Rust, J., Johnston, K. J., Golding, J., & The ALSPAC Study Team. (2002). Testosterone during pregnancy and gender role behavior of preschool children: A longitudinal, population study. Child Development, 73, 1678–1687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, A. C., & Ling, Y. (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current Biology, 17, 623–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iijima, M., Arisaka, O., Minamoto, F., & Arai, Y. (2001). Sex differences in children’s free drawings: A study of girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behaviour, 40, 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 82–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903–933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., Dolezal, C., Baker, S. W., Carlson, A. D., Obeid, J. S., & New, M. I. (2004). Prenatal androgenization affects gender-related behavior but not gender identity in 5-12-year-old girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1966). A social learning view of sex differences in behaviour. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 58–81). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, L. C., & Serbin, L. A. (1996). Antecedents of toddler gender segregation: Cognitive consonance, gender-typed toy preferences and behavioral compatibility. Sex Roles, 35, 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., & Johnson, M. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., & Lansky, L. M. (1976). A sex difference in shape preference. Journal of Social Psychology, 98, 139–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstrom, A., Servin, A., Bohlin, G., Larsson, A., & Wedell, A. (2002). Sex-typed toy play behavior correlates with degree of prenatal androgen exposure assessed by CYP21 genotype in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 87, 5119–5124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OPCS and Employment Department Group. (1991). Standard classification of occupations. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasterski, V. L., Geffner, M. E., Brain, C., Hindmarsh, P., Brook, C., & Hines, M. (2005). Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toy play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development, 76, 264–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennell, G. E. (1994). Babes in toyland: Learning an ideology of gender. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, L. C., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory of sex difference: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1699–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picariello, M. L., Greenberg, D. N., & Pillemer, D. (1990). Children’s sex related stereotyping of colors. Child Development, 61, 1453–1460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerleau, A., Bolduc, D., Malcuit, G., & Cossette, L. (1990). Pink or blue: Environmental gender stereotypes in the first 2 years of life. Sex Roles, 22, 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quadagno, D. M., Briscoe, R., & Quadagno, J. S. (1977). Effects of perinatal gonadal hormones on selected nonsexual behavior patterns: A critical assessment of the nonhuman and human literature. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 62–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Gender development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 858–932). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., Taylor, L. J., Cyphers, L., Greulich, F. K., Lurye, L. E., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). The role of gender constancy in early gender development. Child Development, 78, 1121–1136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servin, A., Nordenstrom, A., Larsson, A., & Bohlin, G. (2003). Prenatal androgens and gender-typed behavior: A study of girls with mild and severe forms of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Developmental Psychology, 39, 440–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, M. E., Jacklin, C. N., & Maccoby, E. E. (1983). Sex-of-child differences in father-child interaction at one year of age. Child Development, 49, 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L., & Pleil, K. E. (2008). Toy story: Why do monkey and human males prefer trucks? Hormones and Behavior, 54, 355–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zentner, M. R. (2001). Preferences for colours and colour emotion combinations in early childhood. Developmental Science, 4, 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Family Research, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3RF, UK

    Vasanti Jadva & Susan Golombok

  2. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Melissa Hines

Authors
  1. Vasanti Jadva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melissa Hines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan Golombok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasanti Jadva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jadva, V., Hines, M. & Golombok, S. Infants’ Preferences for Toys, Colors, and Shapes: Sex Differences and Similarities. Arch Sex Behav 39, 1261–1273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9618-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9618-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation