, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 319-320
Date: 16 Oct 2008

The Public Policy Implications of “Hebephilia”: A Response to Blanchard et al. (2008)

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access
This is an excerpt from the content

Blanchard et al. (2008) present their article on “hebephilia” as an objective analysis of research data. In fact, it is a textbook example of subjective values masquerading as science. Avoiding the crucial public policy implications of their argument, Blanchard et al. advance hebephilia as if it exists in a cultural vacuum. Their recommendations are even more troubling in light of their study’s methodological flaws.

Blanchard et al. assert that their mere identification of hebephilia as a “discriminable erotic age-preference” qualifies it for inclusion in the forthcoming fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s influential Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). They ignore a crucial question at the heart of the current debate over how the DSM should conceptualize sexual disorders (Kleinplatz & Moser, 2005): What makes hebephilia a pathology, as opposed to a normal variant of human sexuality? Indeed, Blanchard et al.’s logic applies equally well to ho ...