Skip to main content
Log in

A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Role of Foot Size in Physical Attractiveness

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disparate cultural practices suggest that small foot size may contribute to female attractiveness. Two hypotheses potentially explain such a pattern. Sexual dimorphism in foot size may lead observers to view small feet as feminine and large feet as masculine. Alternately, because small female feet index both youth and nulliparity, evolution may have favored a male preference for this attribute in order to maximize returns on male reproductive investment. Whereas the observational hypothesis predicts symmetrical polarizing preferences, with small feet being preferred in women and large feet being preferred in men, the evolutionary hypothesis predicts asymmetrical preferences, with the average phenotype being preferred in men. Using line drawings that varied only in regard to relative foot size, we examined judgments of attractiveness in nine cultures. Small foot size was generally preferred for females, while average foot size was preferred for males. These results provide preliminary support for the hypothesis that humans possess an evolved preference for small feet in females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology (& Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, A. R., Menz, H. B., & Hyde, C. C. (1999). The effect of pregnancy on footprint parameters. A prospective investigation. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 89, 405–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, R. A., Hess, L. A., Timpano, E. V., & Serlo, C. (1985). Physiologic changes in the foot during pregnancy. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 75, 297–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantelau, E., & Gede, A. (2002). Foot dimensions of elderly people with and without diabetes mellitus: A data basis for shoe design. Gerontology, 48, 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, V., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T. (2004). Quantitative evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biology Letters, 272, S131–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmus, M. A., & Sibai, B. M. (1993). Blunt abdominal trauma: Are there any predictive factors for abruptio placentae or maternal–fetal distress? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 169, 1054–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, D. M. T., Haley, K. J., & Lal, R. (in press). Sexual dimorphism in foot length proportionate to stature. Annals of Human Biology.

  • Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 92–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foti, T., Davids, J. R., & Bagley, A. (2000). A biomechanical analysis of gait during pregnancy. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 82, 625–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2004). Male muscularity as a good genes indicator: Evidence from women’s preferences for short-term and long-term mates. Paper presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Conference, Austin, TX, January 31st, 2004.

  • Frey, C., Thompson, F., Smith, J., Sanders, M., & Horstman, H. (1993). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society women’s shoe survey. Foot & Ankle, 14, 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, E. C., & Hellebrandt, F. A. (1943). The influence of pregnancy on the location of the center of gravity, postural stability, and body alignment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 46, 374–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2000). The evolution of human skin coloration. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 57–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B. (2000). Splendid slippers: A thousand years of an erotic tradition. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology, 36, 723–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M. (1996). Physical attractiveness and the theory of sexual selection: Results from five populations. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaar, P., & Jokela, J. (1998). Natural selection on age-specific fertilities in human females: Comparison of individual-level fitness measures. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 265, 2415–2420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. A. (2000). Biomechanics of the normal and abnormal foot. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 90, 30–34. %

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundeen, S., Lundquist, K., Cornwall, M. W., & McPoil, T. G. (1994). Plantar pressure during level walking compared with other ambulatory activities. Foot (& Ankle International, 15, 324–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. H. (1997). Does female rank or age affect mate choice behavior in free-ranging rhesus macaques? Folia Primatologica, 68, 366–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2002). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13, 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, W. A. (1976). The sex life of the foot and shoe. New York: Saturday Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality (& Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runnebaum, I. B., Holcberg, G., & Katz, M. (1998). Pregnancy outcome after repeated blunt abdominal trauma. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 80, 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Body shape and women’s attractiveness: The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio. Human Nature, 4, 297–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature/sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (2002, January). Warrior lovers: Erotic fiction, evolution, and female sexuality. Paper presented at the UCLA/UCSB Evolution, Mind and Behavior Conference, Santa Barbara, CA.

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berge, P., & Frost, P. (1986). Skin color Preference, sexual dimorphism, and sexual selection: A case of gene culture co-evolution? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9, 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehr, P., MacDonald, K., Lindner, R., & Yeung, G. (2001). Stabilizing and directional selection on facial paedomorphosis: Averageness or juvenilization. Human Nature, 12, 383–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. K., McClain, L., Rosemurgy, A. S., & Colorado, N. M. (1990). Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma in the third trimester of pregnancy: Maternal and fetal considerations. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 75, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, K. J. (1985). “Your feet’s too big”: An inquiry into psychological and symbolic meanings of the foot. Psychoanalytic Review, 72, 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel M. T. Fessler Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fessler, D.M.T., Nettle, D., Afshar, Y. et al. A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Role of Foot Size in Physical Attractiveness. Arch Sex Behav 34, 267–276 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-3115-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-3115-9

Key Words

Navigation