May 2011, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 199-227,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 30 Apr 2011
The Ways of Criticism
This paper attempts to systematically characterize critical reactions in argumentative discourse, such as objections, critical questions, rebuttals, refutations, counterarguments, and fallacy charges, in order to contribute to the dialogical approach to argumentation. We shall make use of four parameters to characterize distinct types of critical reaction. First, a critical reaction has a focus, for example on the standpoint, or on another part of an argument. Second, critical reactions appeal to some kind of norm, argumentative or other. Third, they each have a particular illocutionary force, which may include that of giving strategic advice to the other. Fourth, a critical reaction occurs at a particular level of dialogue (the ground level or some meta-level). The concepts here developed shall be applied to discussions of critical reactions by Aristotle and by some contemporary authors.
Aristotle. 1965. On sophistical refutations. In On sophistical refutations, on coming-to-be and passing-away, on the cosmos, 10–155. London: W. Heinemann. First ed. 1955. The Loeb Classical Library 400/442 (trans: Forster, Edward S.).
Aristotle. 1976. Topica. In Posterior analytics, Topica, ed. Aristotle, 263–739. London: W. Heinemann. First ed. 1960. The Loeb Classical Library 391 (trans: Forster, Edward S.).
Brunschwig, Jacques. 2007. Aristote: Topiques: Tome II: Livres V–VIII. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (1980). Galileo and the art of reasoning: Rhetorical foundations of logic and scientific method (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 61). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (1987). Six types of fallaciousness: Toward a realistic theory of logical criticism. Argumentation 1, 263–282. (Reprinted in Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 2005. Arguments about arguments: Systematic, critical and historical essays in logical theory, 128–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.).
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 1997. Galileo on the world systems: A new abridged translation and guide. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 2007. Arguments, meta-arguments, and metadialogues: A reconstruction of Krabbe, Govier, and Woods. Argumentation 21: 253–268.CrossRef
Freeman, James B. 1991. Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments: A theory of argument structure. Berlin: Foris.
Garssen, Bart 2001. Argument schemes. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, 81–99. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Govier, Trudy. 1999. The philosophy of argument. In ed. John Hoaglund, with a preface by J. Anthony Blair. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
Hitchcock, David. 2006. Good reasoning on the Toulmin model. In Arguing on the Toulmin model: New essays in argument analysis, ed. David Hitchcock, and Bart Verheij, 203–218. Dordrecht: Springer.
Houtlosser, Peter. 2001. Points of View. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, 27–50. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Johnson, Ralph H. 2000. Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Johnson, Ralph H., and Anthony J. Blair. 1983. Logical self-defense, 2nd ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Krabbe, Erik C.W. 2001. Strategies in dialectic and rhetoric. In Argumentation and its applications (CD-ROM), Proceedings from the Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 17–19, 2001, ed. Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Robert C. Pinto, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON.
Krabbe, Erik C.W. 2002. Profiles of dialogue as a dialectical tool. In Advances in pragma-dialectics, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, 153–167. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Krabbe, Erik C.W. 2003. Metadialogues. In Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, J.Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and A.Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 83–90. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Krabbe, Erik C.W. (2007). Nothing but objections! In Reason reclaimed: Essays in honor of J. Anthony Blair & Ralph H. Johnson, ed. Hans V. Hansen & Robert C. Pinto, 51–63, references pp. 283–299. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
Krabbe, Erik C.W., and Jan Albert van Laar. 2010. About the ways of criticism. In CMNA X: The 10th workshop on computational models of natural argument, ed. Chris Reed, Floriana Grasso, and Nancy Green, 20–28. Lisbon: ECAI.
Krabbe, Erik C.W. & Jan Albert van Laar. 2011. The ways of criticism: Four parameters. To be published in the ISSA-conference (2010) proceedings.
Parsons, Simon, Michael Wooldridge, and Leila Amgoud. 2003. Properties and complexity of some formal inter-agent dialogues. Journal of Logic and Computation 13: 347–376.CrossRef
Plato. 1997. In Complete works, ed. John M. Cooper & Douglas S. Hutchinson, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Pollock, John. 1995. Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Prakken, Henry. 2005. Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation 15: 1009–1040.CrossRef
Rescher, Nicholas. 1977. Dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Smith, Robin. 1997. Aristotle: Topics: Books I and VIII with excerpts from related texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca (1992). Analysing complex argumentation: The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca. 2003. Complex argumentation in a critical discussion. Argumentation 17: 405–419.CrossRef
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1982. The speech acts of arguing and convincing in externalized discussions. Journal of Pragmatics 6: 1–24.CrossRef
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht and Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse: A delicate balance. In Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, and Peter Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2005. Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytical model of critical discussion and conventionalised types of argumentative activity. In The uses of argument: Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, ed. David Hitchcock, 75–84. Hamilton: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
van Laar, Jan Albert. 2010. Commentary on: D. Walton’s “Objections, rebuttals and refutations.” In Argument cultures (CD-ROM), Proceedings from the 8th Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, June 3–6, 2009, University of Windsor, ed. J. Ritola. Windsor, ON: OSSA.
van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C.W. Krabbe. 2012. The burden of criticism. To be published in the OSSA proceedings of 2011.
Walton Douglas, N. 2010. Objections, rebuttals and refutations. In Argument cultures (CD-ROM), Proceedings from the 8th Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, June 3–6, 2009, University of Windsor, ed Juho Ritola. Windsor, ON: OSSA.
Walton, Douglas N., and Erik C.W. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Wells, Simon & Chris, Reed. 2005. Formal dialectic specification. In Argumentation in multi-agent systems, Proceedings of ArgMAS 2004, ed Iyad Rahwan, Pavlos Moraitis, & Chris Reed, 31–43. New York: Springer.
Wlodarczyk, Marta. 2000. Aristotelian dialectic and the discovery of truth. Oxford studies in ancient philosophy 18: 153–210.
- The Ways of Criticism
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 25, Issue 2 , pp 199-227
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Critical reaction
- Snoeck Henkemans
- Strategic advice
- Industry Sectors