Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the argument from coherence is submitted to a critical analysis. First, it is argued to be a complex form of coordinative argumentation, structured on various argumentative levels. Then, using the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation a distinction is brought out between two basic forms of the argument from coherence: in one use this argument occurs as a sequence of two symptomatic arguments; in the other use we have a main symptomatic argument supported by a subordinate pragmatic argument. Finally, from an evaluative point of view it is assessed whether the argument from coherence can be found acceptable as a tool for settling disputes. It is claimed that in general, we can welcome this argumentative structure as sound and fully acceptable provided that we are aware of the interpretative discretion its use implies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Alexy A. Peczenik (1990) ArticleTitle‘The Concept of Coherence and its Significance for Discursive Rationality’ Ratio Juris 3 130–147

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Alexy (1998) ‘Coherence and Argumentation or the Genuine Twin Criterialess Super Criterion’ A. Aarnio (Eds) et al. On Coherence Theory of Law Juristfoerlaget Lund 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Alexy (2002) A Theory of Constitutional Rights (1986) Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. N. Bańkowski N. MacCormick (1991) ‘Statutory Interpretation in the United Kingdom’ N MacCormick R Summers (Eds) Interpreting Statutes Dartmouth Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dworkin (1986) Law’s Empire Fontana London

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Eemeren Particlevan R. Grootendorst (1984) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions Foris Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Eemeren Particlevan R. Grootendorst (1987) ArticleTitle‘Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective’ Argumentation 1 283–301 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00136779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Eemeren Particlevan R. Grootendorst (1988) ArticleTitle‘Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective’ Argumentation 2 271–291

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Eemeren Particlevan R. Grootendorst (1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective Erlbaum Hilllsdale NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hage (2004) ArticleTitle‘Law and Coherence’ Ratio Juris 17 87–105. Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0952-1917.2004.00257.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Kress (1999) ‘Coherence’ D. Patterson (Eds) A Company to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory Blackwell Oxford 533–552

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Levenbook (1984) ArticleTitle‘The Role of Coherence in Legal Reasoning’ Law and Philosophy 3 355–374. Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00654833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, N.: 1983, ‘On Legal Decision and Their Consequences: From Dewey to Dworkin’, New York University Law Review, 239–258.

  • N. MacCormick (1984) ‘Coherence in Legal Justification’ A. Peczenik (Eds) Theory of Legal Science Reidel Dordrecht 235–251

    Google Scholar 

  • N. MacCormick (1994) Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978) Clarendon Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, N., Summers, R. (eds.): 1991 Interpreting Statutes, Dartmouth Aldershot.

  • N. MacCormick R. Summers (1991) ‘Interpretation and Justification’ N MacCormick R Summers (Eds) Interpreting Statutes Dartmouth Aldershot 511–544

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Peczenik (1989) On Law and Reason Reidel Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Peczenik (1990) ‘Coherence, Truth and Rightness in the Law’ P. Nerhot (Eds) Law, Interpretation and Reality Kluwer Dordrecht 275–309

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Raz (1994) ‘The Relevance of Coherence’ J. Raz (Eds) Ethics in the Public Domain. Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics Clarendon Oxford 277–325

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Rodriguez-Blanco (2001) ArticleTitle‘A Revision of the Constitutive and Epistemic Coherence Theories of Law’ Ratio Juris 14 212–232. Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9337.00178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarello, G.: 1980, L’interpretazione della legge, pp. 369–370, Giuffrè, Milan.

  • V. Villa (1990) ‘Normative Coherence and Epistemological Presuppositions of Justification’ P. Nerhot (Eds) Law, Interpretation and Reality Kluwer Dordrecht 431–455

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Zaccaria (1990) ‘Hermeneutics and Narrative Comprehension’ P. Nerhot (Eds) Law, Interpretation and Reality Kluwer Dordrecht 251–274

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, University of Leicester, United Kingdom

    Stefano Bertea

Authors
  1. Stefano Bertea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Bertea.

Additional information

A preliminary version of this essay was presented at the symposium organised by the Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory, and Rhetoric at the University of Amsterdamon the 27/02/04. I wish to express my indebtedness to Dora Achourioti, Francesco Belvisi, Frans van Eemeren, Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, Jean Wagemans, Peter Houtlosser, and Henrike Jansen for their helpful remarks. Needless to say, the responsibility for the views expressed herein as well as for any errors of form or content rests solely with me.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bertea, S. Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?. Argumentation 19, 433–446 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-0510-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-0510-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation