Building an Infrastructure for Archival Research Article First Online: 22 February 2006 DOI:
Cite this article as: Gilliland, A. & Mckemmish, S. Arch Sci (2004) 4: 149. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-6742-6 Abstract
This article chronicles the rapid expansion since 1990 of research within archival science and characterizes contemporary archival research culture. It examines the role and state of key factors that have led to the development of the existing research infrastructure, such as growth in doctoral education, forums for presenting and publishing research, the numbers and size of graduate archival education programs, availability of diverse funding for research, transdisciplinary and international research collaborations, and application of innovative research methods and tools appropriate for investigating increasingly complex and wide-ranging research questions. An Appendix articulates and names archival research methods, including those derived and adapted from other disciplines, with a view to adding to the “literary warrant” for archival research methods, promoting the rigorous application of research design and methods, and providing sources for the teaching of research methods for professional and research careers. The article concludes with recommendations about how to sustain and extend the emerging research front.
Keywords archival research culture research paradigms research design research methods References
Gilliland-Swetland, A., “Archival Research: A ‘New’ Issue for Graduate Education”,
The American Archivist (Fall 2000): for explanations of grounded theory, narrative analysis, ethnography, case studies, and historiography as used in archival research.
Research Methods for Students, Academics and Professionals: Information Management and Systems, 2nd edn., (Wagga: CIS CSU, 2002): for extended discussion of theory building, grounded theory, ethnography, case studies, action research, systems development, surveys and historiography, and related methods and techniques as applied in information management research. Action Research
Cook, T., “Appraisal Methodology: Macro-Appraisal and Functional Analysis. Part A: Concepts and Theory; and Part B: Guidelines for Performing an Archival Appraisal on Government Records”, (2002)
Heazlewood, J., et al. 1999 “Electronic Records: Problem Solved? A report on the Public Record Office Victoria’s Electronic Records Strategy” Archives and Manuscripts 27 6 23 Google Scholar Hol, R.C., Vries, A.G. 1998 PIVOT Down Under: A Report Archives and Manuscripts 26 8 101 Google Scholar McKernan, J. 1991Curriculum Action Research. A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner Kogan Page London Google Scholar
McCutcheon, G. and Jurg, B., “Alternative Perspectives on Action Research”,
Theory into Practice 24(3) (Summer 1990).
Oosthuizen, M., “Action Research”, in Williamson, Chapter 8 (2002) pp. 141–158.
Cox, R.J., “Searching for Authority: Archivists and Electronic Records in the New World At the Fin-de-Siecle”,
First Monday (2000). Borgman, C., Furner, J. 2002 “Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics” Cronin, B. eds. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology Information Today Medford, NJ 3 72 Google Scholar Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. 1990Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science Elsevier Amsterdam Google Scholar Gilliland-Swetland, Anne J. 1992 “Archivy and the Computer: A Citation Analysis of North American Periodical Articles” Archival Issues 17 95 112 Google Scholar
Yakel, E., “Seeking Information, Seeking Connections, Seeking Meaning: Genealogists and Family Historians”,
Information Research 10(1) (2004). Case Studies Babbie, E. 2004The Practice of Social Research 10 Wadsworth Belmost, CA Google Scholar
Owning Memory: How a Caribbean Community Lost its Archives and Found Its History (Westport, Conn. and London: Libraries Unlimited, 2003), based on her PhD thesis, Defining Custody: The Impact of Archival Custody on the Relationship Between Communities and their Historical Records in the Information Age. A Case Study of the United States Virgin Islands (University of Pittsburgh, 1999). Cox, R.J. Wallace, D. eds. 2002Archives and the Public Good: Accountability and Records in Modern Society Quorum Books Westport, Connecticut Google Scholar
Darke, P. and Shanks, G., “Case Study Research” in Williamson, Chapter 5 (2002), pp. 93–106.
Ketelaar, E. 1997 “The Difference Best Postponed? Cultures and Comparative Archival Science” Archivaria 44 142 148 Google Scholar
Information in Organisations: A Comparative Study of Information Cultures, PhD Thesis (Monash University, 2005).
The Public’s Use of Federal Recordkeeping Statutes to Shape Federal Information Policy: A Study of the PROFS Case, Ph.D. Dissertation (University of Pittsburgh, 1997). Content, Discourse, Narrative and Conceptual Analysis Abbott, A. 2003Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences Norton New York, NY Google Scholar Babbie, E. 2004The Practice of Social Research 10 Wadsworth Belmost, CA Google Scholar Brothman, B. 1999 “Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction” Archivaria 48 64 89 Google Scholar Cook, T. 1997 “What Is Past Is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift” Archivaria 43 17 63 Google Scholar Fairclough, N. 1989Language and Power Longman Essex, England Google Scholar Frohmann, B. 1989 “Discourse Analysis as a Research Method In Library and Information Science” Library and Information Science Research 16 119 138 Google Scholar
The Ethical-Legal Context of Recordkeeping: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, PhD Thesis (Monash University, 2002).
From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis (Oxford, 1998).
Ketelaar, E., “Recordkeeping and Societal Power”, in S. McKemmish, M. Piggott, B. Reed and F. Upward (eds.),
Archives: Recordkeeping in Society (Wagga-Wagga, Charles Sturt University, 2005) (Topics in Australasian Library and Information Studies, No. 24), pp. 277–298.
Leiter, B., “Introduction”, in Leiter (ed.),
The Future for Philosophy (Oxford, 2004) – re conceptual analysis. Neuendorf, K.A. 2002The Content Analysis Guidebook Sage Thousand Oaks, CA Google Scholar Roberts, C.W. eds. 1997Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Inferences from Texts and Transcripts Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ Google Scholar West, M.D. eds. 2001aApplications of Computer Content Analysis Ablex Westport, CT Google Scholar West, M.D. eds. 2001bTheory, Method, and Practice in Computer Content Analysis Ablex Westport, CT Google Scholar Diplomatics Carucci, P. 1987Il Documento Contemporaneo La Nuova Italia Scientifica Rome Google Scholar Duranti, L. 1998Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science Society of American Archivists, Association of Canadian Archivists and Scarecrow Press Lanham, MD Google Scholar Duranti, L., Eastwood, T., MacNeil, H. 2002Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records Kluwer Academic Publishing Dordrecht Google Scholar Duranti, L., MacNeil, H. 1996 “The Protection of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research” Archivaria 42 46 67 Google Scholar Ethnography and Ethnology deMarrais, K.B. eds. 1998Inside Stories: Qualitative Research Reflections Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ Google Scholar Geertz, C. 1973The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays Basic Books New York, NY Google Scholar
The Imperative to Preserve: Competing Definitions of Value in the World of Film Preservation, Ph.D. Dissertation (Los Angeles: University of California, 2001). Hammersly, M., Atkinson, P. 1995Ethnography Routledge London Google Scholar Sanday, P.R. 1983 “The Ethnographic Paradigm(s)” Maanen, J. eds. Qualitative Methodology Sage Beverly Hills, CA Google Scholar
Saule, S., “Ethnography”, Williamson, Chapter 9 (2002), pp. 173–99.
Scientists, Records, and the Practical Politics of Infrastructure, Ph.D. Dissertation (Los Angeles: University of California, 2002). Stoler, A.L. 2002 “Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance” Archival Science 2 87 109 CrossRef Google Scholar Stringer, E., et al. 1997Community-Based Ethnography: Breaking Traditional Boundaries of Research, Teaching and Learning Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ Google Scholar
Documenting School Life: Formal and Informal Imprints of a Fifth-grade Classroom, Ph.D. Dissertation (Los Angeles: University of California, 2004).
Recordkeeping in Radiology: The Relationships between Activities and Records in Radiological Processes, Ph.D. Dissertation (University of Michigan, 1997). Yakel, E. 2001 The Social Construction of Accountability: Radiologists and Their Record-keeping Practices The Information Society 17 233 245 CrossRef Google Scholar Expert Knowledge Analysis
Giarratano, J.C. and Rile, G.D.,
Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, 4th edn.: Principles and Programming (Course Technology, 2004).
Development of an Expert Assistant for Archival Appraisal of Electronic Communications: An Exploratory Study, Ph.D. Dissertation (University of Michigan, 1995). Grounded Theory Bantin, P.C. 1998 “Developing a Strategy for Managing Electronic Records: The Findings of the Indiana University Electronic Records Project” The American Archivist 61 328 364 Google Scholar Bearman, D. 1994Electronic Evidence: Strategies for Managing Records in Contemporary Organizations Archives and Museum Informatics Pittsburgh Google Scholar Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. 1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research Aldine Chicago Google Scholar Hedstrom, M. 1997 “Building Record-Keeping Systems: Archivists are not Alone on the Wild Frontier” Archivaria 44 44 71 Google Scholar Strauss, A., Corbin, J. 1990Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques Sage Newbury Park, CA Google Scholar Ellis, D. 1993 “Modeling the Information – Seeking Patterns of Academic Researchers: A Grounded Theory” Library Quarterly 63 469 486 Google Scholar Historiography Cox, R.J. 2000Closing an Era: Historical Perspectives on Modern Archives and Records Management Greenwood Publishing Group Westport, CT Google Scholar
Johanson, G., “Historical Research”, in Williamson, Chapter 10 (2002), pp. 177–190.
Ketelaar, E., Horsman, P., Thomassen, T. 2003 “New Respect for the Old Order: The Context of the Dutch Manual” American Archivist 66 249 270 Google Scholar
Piggott, M., “The History of Australian Recordkeeping: A Framework for Research”,
Australian Library Journal (November, 1998): 343–354. Literary Analysis
Purposeful Data: The Roles and Purposes of Recordkeeping Metadata, PhD Thesis (Monash University, 2005).
The Influence of Warrant on the Acceptance and Credibility of the Functional Requirements for Recordkeeping, Ph.D. Dissertation (University of Pittsburgh, 1996). Duff, W. 1998 “Harnessing the Power of Warrant” The American Archivist 61 88 105 Google Scholar
Gilliland, A.J., Rouche, N., Evans, J. and Lindberg, L., “Towards a Twenty-First Century Metadata Infrastructure Supporting the Creation, Preservation and Use of Trustworthy Records: Developing the InterPARES2 Metadata Schema Registry”,
Archival Science (2005, forthcoming). Young, H. eds. 1983The ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science American Library Association Chicago Google Scholar Model Building
The Long-term Preservation of Authentic Electronic Records: The Findings of the InterPARES Project
(2005); available at
McKemmish, S., Acland, G., Ward, N., Reed, B. 1999 “Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema” Archivaria 48 3 43 Google Scholar
Monash University, Recordkeeping Metadata Research Project,
Surveys, Interviews and Focus Groups Craig, B.L. 2000 “Canadian Archivists: What Types of People are They?”> Archivaria 50 79 92 Google Scholar Gilliland-Swetland, A.J. 2001 “Popularizing the Finding Aid: Exploiting EAD to Enhance Online Browsing and Retrieval in Archival Information Systems by Diverse User Groups” Journal of Internet Cataloging 4 199 225 CrossRef Google Scholar
Pederson, A., “Understanding Ourselves and Others” in S. Hicks and K. Crowley (eds.),
Archives at Risk: Accountability, Vulnerability and Credibility Proceedings of the 1999 Conference and Annual General Meeting of the Australian Society of Archivists Inc., Brisbane, Queensland, 29–31 July 1999 (Canberra: Australian Society of Archivists Inc., 2002), pp. 61–93.
Russell, L., “Indigenous Records and Archives: Mutual Obligations and Building Trust”,
Archives and Manuscripts (May 2005, forthcoming).
Tanner, K., “Survey Research”, in Williamson, Chapter 71 (2002), pp. 71–92.
Systems Analysis Bantin, P.C., Bernbom, G. 1996 “The Indiana University Electronic Records Project: Analyzing Functions, Identifying Transactions, and Evaluating Recordkeeping Systems—A report on Methodology” Archives and Museum Informatics: Cultural Informatics Quarterly 10 246 266 Google Scholar Cook, T. 2004 “Macro-appraisal and Functional Analysis: Documenting Governance Rather Than Government” Journal of the Society of Archivists (UK) 25 5 18 Google Scholar
State Records Authority NSW, DIRKS Manual: A Strategic Approach to Managing Business Information (National Archives of Australia, rev. July 2003),
Systems Design and Development
Burstein, F., “Systems Development in Information Systems Research”, in Williamson, Chapter 7 (2002), pp. 147–158.
Evans, J., McKemmish, S. and Bhoday, K., “Create Once, Use Many Times: The Clever Use of Recordkeeping Metadata for Multiple Archival Purposes”,
Archival Science (2005, forthcoming).
Gilliland-Swetland, A., Rouche, N., Evans, J. and Lindberg, L., “Towards a Twenty-First Century Metadata Infrastructure Supporting the Creation, Preservation and Use of Trustworthy Records: Developing the InterPARES 2 Metadata Schema Registry”,
Archival Science (2005, forthcoming).
Nunamaker, J.F, Chen, J.R. Minder and Purdin, Titus D.M., “Systems Development in Information Systems Research”,
Journal of Management Information Systems 7(3) (Winter 1990–91): 89–106. Theory Building Brown, R. Winter 1991–92 “Records Acquisition Strategy and Its Theoretical Foundation: The Case for a Concept of Archival Hermeneutics” Archivaria 33 34 56 Google Scholar Cook, T. 1992 “Mind Over Matter: Towards a New Theory of Archival Appraisal” Craig, B. eds. The Archival Imagination: Essays in Honour of Hugh A. Taylor Association of Canadian Archivists Ottawa 38 70 Google Scholar
Harris, V., “Law, Evidence and Electronic Records: A Strategic Perspective from the Global Periphery”,
Comma, International Journal on Archives (1–2) (2001): 29–44. Hurley, C. 1995a “Ambient Functions – Abandoned Children to Zoos” Archivaria 40 21 39 Google Scholar Hurley, C. 1995b “Problems with Provenance” Archives and Manuscripts 23 234 259 Google Scholar Hurley, C. 1998 “The Making and Keeping of Records: (1) What are Finding Aids For?” Archives and Manuscripts 26 57 77 Google Scholar Hurley, C. 2000 “The Making and Keeping of Records: (2) The Tyranny of Listing” Archives and Manuscripts 28 8 23 MathSciNet Google Scholar Lynham, S.A. 2002 “The General Method of Theory-Building Research in Applied Disciplines” Advances in Developing Human Resources. 4 221 241 Google Scholar Nesmith, T. 1999 “Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory” Archivaria 47 136 150 Google Scholar
Nesmith, T., “Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives”,
The American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2002): 24–41. Upward, F. 1996 “Structuring the Records Continuum – Part One: Postcustodial Principles and Properties” Archives and Manuscripts 24 268 285 Google Scholar Upward, F. 1997 “Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping” Archives and Manuscripts 25 10 35 Google Scholar