Skip to main content
Log in

Advanced Combustor Exit Plane Temperature Diagnostics Based on Large Eddy Simulations

Going Further than the Radial Temperature Distribution Factor

  • Published:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accurate description and flow calibration at the exit of a gas turbine combustor is a key point of turbine design. Indeed, the temperature field at the turbine inlet directly impacts both the work extraction by the turbine stages as well as drives the wall heat transfer occurring on the vanes and rotor surfaces. Properly simulating or measuring this critical planar interface has been an extensive topic of research. Despite such efforts, industrial exploitation of the various measures at that interface usually resumes to a quantification of the temperature heterogeneities through the Local Radial Temperature Distortion Factor (LRTDF), thereby loosing major spatial and unsteady information. As lean burn configurations become a standard for aero-engine combustors, the absence of dilution holes reduces the intensity of mixing and the use of more advanced statistical tools should propose an exhaustive representation of the temperature map and mixing quality. Current state-of-the-art numerical design of gas turbine combustor relies on Large Eddy Simulations (LES) giving access to a fully 3-D temporally dependent flow field throughout the combustion chamber. Going beyond LRTDF is therefore possible and advanced analyses of the combustor-turbine interface are accessible to better qualify proposed design changes. In this work, a simple statistical representation of the temperature distribution is introduced and applied for the analysis of a lean burn combustor simulator interface. It is shown that at the exit of this chamber, the temperature samples are distributed following a non-Gaussian shape, highlighting a most probable local temperature largely different from the conventional mean value. The use of high order moments explains such deviations and indicates the presence of strongly segregated zones governed by the technological implementation of effusion cooling systems. Based on this diagnostic, a new and complementary representation of the LRTDF is proposed, accounting for the statistical dimension of the classical (radius, temperature) formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Povey, T., Chana, K.S., Jones, T.V., Hurrion, J.: The effect of hot-streaks on hp vane surface and endwall heat transfer: An experimental and numerical study. J. Turbomach. 129(1), 32–43 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Salvadori, S., Giovanni, R., Insinna, M., Martelli, F.: Analysis of combustor/vane interaction with decoupled and loosely coupled approaches. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, no. GT2012-69038, ASME (2012)

  3. Insinna, M., Griffini, D., Salvadori, S., Martelli, F.: Conjugate heat transfer analysis of a film cooled high-pressure turbine vane under realistic combustor exit flow conditions. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, no. GT2014-25280 (2014)

  4. Shang, T., Epstein, A.: Analysis of hot streak effects on turbine rotor heat load. J. Turbomach. 119(3), 544–553 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roback, R.J., Dring, R.P.: Hot streaks and phantom cooling in a turbine rotor passage: Part 1—separate effects. J. Turbomach. 115(4), 657–666 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ireland, P.T., Dailey, G.: Aerothermal performance of internal cooling systems in turbomachines.. In: Internal Cooling in Turbomachinery, VKI Lecture Series, Vol. 2010-05 (2010)

  7. Sagaut, P.: Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows: An Introduction, Scientific Computation. Springer (2006)

  8. Gicquel, L.Y.M., Gourdain, N., Boussuge, J.-F., Deniau, H., Staffelbach, G., Wolf, P., Poinsot, T.: High performance parallel computing of flows in complex geometries. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences - Mathématiques 339, 104–124 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gicquel, L.Y.M., Staffelbach, G., Poinsot, T.J.: Large Eddy Simualtions of gaseous flames in gas turbine combustion chambers. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 38, 782–817 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Povey, T., Qureshi, I.: Developments in hot-streak simulators for turbine testing. J. Turbomach. 131(3), 1–15 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendel, J.: Lessons in Estimation Theory for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control, Pearson Education (1995)

  12. Dekking, F.M.: A modern introduction to probability and statistics: Understanding why and how. Springer (2005)

  13. Sagaut, P., Cambon, C.: Homogeneous Turbulence Dynamics. Cambridge University Press (2008)

  14. Pope, S.: Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Girimaji, S.S.: Assumed β-pdf model for turbulent mixing: Validation and extension to multiple scalar mixing. Combust. Sci. Technol. 78(4-6), 177–196 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaffney Jr, R.L., White, J.A., Girimaji, S.S., Drummond, J.P.: Modeling temperature and species fluctuations in turbulent, reacting flow. Comput. Syst. Eng. 5 (2), 117–133 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bakosi, J., Ristorcelli, J.R.: Exploring the beta distribution in variable-density turbulent mixing. J. Turbul. 11(37), 1–31 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Joanes, D.N., Gill, C.A.: Comparing measures of sample skewness and kurtosis, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician) 47(1), 183–189 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dorić, D., Nikolić-Dorić, E., Jevremović, V., Malisić, J.: On measuring skewness and kurtosis. Qual Quant 43(3), 481–493 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Balanda, K.P., MacGillivray, H.L.: Kurtosis: A critical review. The American Statistician 42(2), 111–119 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Koupper, C., Caciolli, G., Gicquel, L., Duchaine, F., Bonneau, G., Tarchi, L., Facchini, B.: Development of an engine representative combustor simulator dedicated to hot streak generation. J. Turbomach. 136(11), 1–10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mendez, S., Nicoud, F.: Adiabatic homogeneous model for flow around a multiperforated plate. AIAA J. 46(10), 2623–2633 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mendez, S., Nicoud, F.: Large Eddy Simulation of a bi-periodic turbulent flow with effusion. J. Fluid Mech. 598, 27–65 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Poinsot, T., Lele, S.: Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 101(1), 104–129 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoo, C.S., Im, H.G.: Characteristic boundary conditions for simulations of compressible reacting flows with multi-dimensional, viscous and reaction effects. Combustion Theory and Modelling 11(2), 259–286 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Schoenfeld, T., Rudgyard, M.: Steady and unsteady flows simulations using the hybrid flow solver AVBP. AIAA J. 37(11), 1378–1385 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Colin, O., Rudgyard, M.: Development of high-order taylor–galerkin schemes for LES. J. Comput. Phys. 162(2), 338–371 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Smagorinsky, J.: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: 1. the basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99–164 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boileau, M., Pascaud, S., Riber, E., Cuenot, B., Gicquel, L., Poinsot, T.J., Cazalens, M.: Investigation of two-fluid methods for Large Eddy Simulation of spray combustion in Gas Turbines. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 80(3), 291–321 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolf, P., Balakrishnan, R., Staffelbach, G., Gicquel, L., Poinsot, T.J.: Using LES to study reacting flows and instabilities in annular combustion chambers. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 88(1-2), 191–206 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Hannebique, G., Sierra, P., Riber, E., Cuenot, B.: Large eddy simulation of reactive two-phase flow in an aeronautical multipoint burner. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 90(2), 449–469 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Beér, J., Chigier, N.: Combustion aerodynamics. Halsted Press Division, Wiley (1972)

  33. Gupta, A.K., Lilley, D.G., Syred, N.: Swirl flows. Abacus Press (1984)

  34. Bacci, T., Caciolli, G., Facchini, B., Tarchi, L., Koupper, C., Champion, J.-L.: Flowfield and temperature profiles measurements on a combustor simulator dedicated to hot streaks generation. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, no. GT2015-42217 (2015)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Koupper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koupper, C., Gicquel, L., Duchaine, F. et al. Advanced Combustor Exit Plane Temperature Diagnostics Based on Large Eddy Simulations. Flow Turbulence Combust 95, 79–96 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-015-9607-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-015-9607-3

Keywords

Navigation