Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Persistence of informal social networks in East Asia: Evidence from South Korea

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the nature and influence of informal social networks in South Korea (yongo) by analyzing trust levels and network cohesion. Predominantly based on studies on Chinese guanxi, it is widely believed that the further a nation develops stable formal institutions the more the influence of informal relations decreases. Given South Korea’s position as a strong economic powerhouse with established rule of law and democratic institutions, the influence of yongo should play an insignificant role today. We find significant evidence that network cohesion of yongo is still strong in South Korea, despite its economic rise. Contrary to expectation, we observe a higher-than-expected degree of general trust and a continuous commitment to yongo ties at the same time. These findings document recent changes in South Korea such as the beginning of its multicultural opening, whereas informal yongo ties, characterized by emotional interpersonal bonds, still remain pronounced. Foremost, we recommend current beliefs about the correlation of institutional development and decreasing informal transactions to be reconsidered. We propose further studies to better understand how informal social networks evolve over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrast, M., Botero, J., Martinez, J., Ponce, A., & Pratt, C. 2013. World Justice Project (WJP) rule of law index 2012–2013. Washington, DC: The World Justice Project.

  • Ahn, T. K., & Ostrom, E. 2008. Social capital and collective action. In D. Castiglione, J. van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.). The handbook of social capital: 70–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, J. P. 1989. Wa, guanxi, and inhwa: Managerial principles in Japan, China, and Korea. Business Horizons, 32(2): 26–31.

  • Ambler, T. 1994. Marketing’s third paradigm: Guanxi. Business Strategy Review, 5(4): 69–80.

  • Anderson, A., & Lee, E. Y. 2008. From tradition to modern—Attitudes and applications of guanxi in Chinese entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(4): 775–787.

  • Bian, Y., & Ang, S. 1997. Guanxi networks and job mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces, 75(3): 981–1005.

  • Brislin, R. W. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3): 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. 1986. The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.). Field methods in cross-cultural research: 137–164. Beverly Hills: Sage.

  • Cha, S. H. 2000. Korean civil religion and modernity. Social Compass, 47(4): 467–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. Y. K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Szeto, R. W. F. 2002. The dynamics of guanxi and ethics for Chinese executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4): 327–336.

  • Chang, K. 2011. A path to understanding guanxi in China’s transitional economy: Variations on network behavior. Sociological Theory, 29(4): 315–339.

  • Chang, C. S., & Chang, N. J. 1994. The Korean management system: Cultural, political, economic foundations. Westport: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-J. 2002. Transcending paradox: The Chinese “middle way” perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. 2010. West meets East: Toward an ambicultural approach to management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4): 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. 2011. The relational perspective as a business mindset: Managerial implications for East and West. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3): 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B.-S., Wang, A.-C., & Huang, M.-P. 2009. The road more popular versus the road less travelled: An “insider’s” perspective of advancing Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A., Foucart, A., Arnon, I., Aparicic, M., & Apesteguia, J. 2014a. “Piensa” twice: On the foreign language effect in decision making. Cognition, 130(2): 236–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A., Foucart, A., Hayakawa, S., Aparici, M., Apesteguia, J., & Heafner, J. 2014b. Your morals depend on language. PLoS ONE, 9(4): e94842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H., Leung, T. K., Luk, S. T., & Wong, Y. 1995. The benefits of “Guanxi”: The value of relationships in developing the Chinese market. Industrial Marketing Management, 24(3): 207–214.

  • Dunfee, T. W., & Warren, D. E. 2001. Is guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3): 191–204.

  • Dunning, J. H., & Kim, C. 2007. The cultural roots of guanxi: An exploratory study. World Economy, 30(2): 329–341.

  • EAB. 2003. East-Asian barometer 2001–2003. http://www.jdsurvey.net/jds/jdsurveyAnalisis.jsp?Idioma=I&ES_COL=101, Accessed Mar. 10, 2015.

  • Edelman. 2014. 2014 Edelman trust barometer executive summary. http://edelmaneditions.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/FINAL-BROCHURE-2014.pdf, Accessed Mar. 10, 2015.

  • EIU. 2010. Democracy index 2010. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y. 2002a. Guanxi’s consequences: Personal gains at social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(4): 371–380.

  • Fan, Y. 2002b. Questioning guanxi: Definition, classification and implications. International Business Review, 11(5): 543–561.

  • Fang, T. 2003. A critique of Hofstede’s fifth national culture dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(3): 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, T. 2009. Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, T. 2012. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, T., & Faure, G. O. 2011. Chinese communication characteristics: A Yin Yang perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3): 320–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

  • Gambetta, D. 2000. Can we trust trust? Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, F. F., Hung, K., & Tse, D. K. 2008. When does guanxi matter? Issues of capitalization and its dark sides. Journal of Marketing, 72(4): 12–28.

  • Guo, C., & Miller, J. K. 2010. Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China. Management and Organization Review, 6(2): 267–291.

  • Gupta, A. K. 2011. The relational perspective and East meets West: A commentary. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3): 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, D. 1998. The declining significance of guanxi in China’s economic transition. China Quarterly, 154(1): 254–282.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. 2006. Multivariate data analysis, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4): 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. 2002. The evolution of institutions: An agenda for future theoretical research. Constitutional Political Economy, 11(2): 111–127.

  • Hofstede, G. 2007. Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4): 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtbrügge, D. 2013. Indigenous management research. Management International Review, 53(1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horak, S. 2014. Antecedents and characteristics of informal relation-based networks in Korea: yongo, yonjul and inmaek. Asia Pacific Business Review, 20(1): 78–108.

  • Hutchings, K., & Weir, D. 2006. Understanding networking in China and the Arab world: Lessons for international managers. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(4): 272–290.

  • International Monetary Fund. 2012. World economic outlook database IMF. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/01/weodata/download.aspx, Accessed Feb. 10, 2014.

  • Jeffries, F. L., & Reed, R. 2000. Trust and adaption in relational contracting. Academy of Management Review, 25(4): 873–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-H. 2000. Emergence of the network society: Trends, new challenges, and an implication for network capitalism. Korea Journal, 40(3): 161–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. T. 2007. Korean elites: Social networks and power. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37(1): 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. M., Kyung, Y. O., Lee, H., & Lim, C. H. 2012. South Korea—Advances toward a multicultural society. Paju City: Nanam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korea Herald. 2014. S. Koreans’ social trust level low: Study. http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20141123000274, Accessed Nov. 23, 2014.

  • Kramer, R. M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. 1995. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Ledeneva, A. V. 1998. Russia’s economy of favours: Blat, networking, and informal exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. V. 2003. Informal practices in changing societies: Comparing Chinese guanxi and Russian blat. London: University College.

  • Lee, J. 2000. Society in a vortex? Yonjul network and civil society in Korea. Korea Journal, 40(1): 366–391.

  • Leung, T. K. P., & Wong, Y. H. 2001. The ethics and positioning of guanxi in China. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(1): 55–64.

  • Lew, S.-C. 2001. Development of township-village enterprises and the re-institutionalization of the family in China. Global Economic Review, 30(4): 83–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lew, S.-C. 2013. The Korean economic development path—Confucian tradition, affective network. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lew, S.-C., Chang, M.-H., & Bae, Y. 2002. Good government, social capital, and trust: Survey findings from Korea, Japan, Denmark and Sweden. Korean Social Science Journal, 29(2): 35–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 1998. Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19(5): 829–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2007. Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2): 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2010. Toward a learning-based view of internationalization: The accelerated trajectories of cross-border learning for latecomers. Journal of International Management, 16(1): 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2012. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4): 849–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P., Leung, K., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J.-D. 2012. Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. 2002. How the East and the West shall meet. Development and Society, 31(2): 211–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, S., Simmons, L. C., & Kali, R. 1999. Guanxi versus the market: Ethics and efficiency. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2): 231–247.

  • Luo, Y. 2007. Guanxi and business. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manske, F., & Moon, Y. 2003. Cultural signature of interorganisational information systems? The development of EDI systems in Korean automotive industry. AI & SOCIETY, 17(1): 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michailova, S., & Worm, V. 2003. Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and guanxi. European Management Journal, 21(4): 509–519.

  • Morrow, J. L., Jr., Hansen, M. H., & Pearson, A. W. 2004. The cognitive and affective antecedents of general trust within cooperative organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16(1): 48–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V. 1992. Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 2008. Building trust to solve commons dilemmas: Taking small steps to test an evolving theory of collective action. In S. Levin (Ed.). Games, groups, and the global good: 207–228. New York: Springer.

  • Parayitam, S., & Dooley, R. S. 2009. The interplay between cognitive- and affective conflict and cognition- and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62(8): 789–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5): 455–477.

  • Pearce, J. A., & Robinson, R. B. 2000. Cultivating guanxi as a foreign investor strategy. Business Horizons, 43(1): 31–38.

  • Pejovich, S. 1999. Interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic development. Journal of Markets & Morality, 2(2): 164–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. Q. 2005. How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(4): 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. W. 2010. Reflections: The past and future of research on institutions and institutional change. Journal of Change Management, 10(1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sik, S. H. 2005. A brief history of Korea. The spirit of Korean cultural roots. Seoul: Ewha Womens’ University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, C., Mitchell, R. K., & Sirgy, M. J. 2006. Enabling guanxi management in China: A hierarchical stakeholder model of effective guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3): 301–319.

  • Tonoyan, V., Strohmeyer, R., Habib, M., & Perlitz, M. 2010. Corruption and entrepreneurship: How formal and informal institutions shape small firm behavior in transition and mature market economies. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(5): 803–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J.-L. L. 1997. Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1): 56–80.

  • Ungson, G., Steers, R., & Park, S. 1997. Korean enterprise: The quest for globalization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Jing, R. 2012. Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L. 2007. Guanxi vs. relationship marketing: Exploring underlying differences. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1): 81–86.

  • Williamson, O. E. 2000. New institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., & Brennan, R. 2010. Doing business in China: Is the importance of guanxi diminishing?. European Business Review, 22(6): 652–665.

  • WVS. 2009. World values survey 1981–2008. http://www.wvsevsdb.com/wvs/WVSData.jsp, Accessed Feb. 10, 2014.

  • Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6): 1641–1658.

  • Yang, M. M.-H. 2002. The resilience of guanxi and its new deployments: A critique of some new guanxi scholarship. China Quarterly, 170: 459–476.

  • Yee, J. 2000a. The social networks of Koreans. Korea Journal, 40(1): 325–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, J. 2000b. Too modern too soon? Dualism in civil society, everyday life, and social relations in contemporary Korea. Korea Journal, 40(1): 282–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, J., & Chang, D. 2009. Transparency, a key factor to improve social cohesion: A review of the Korean experience in the context of social quality research. Development and Society, 38(2): 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, J., & Nam, E. Y. 2008. The social capital of Korans: Determinants of personal ties and its effects (in Korean). Korean Journal of Sociology, 42(7): 178–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, L. M., & Ellis, P. 2000. Insider-outsider perspectives of guanxi. Business Horizons, 43(1): 25–30.

  • Yoon, W., & Hyun, E. 2010. Economic, social and institutional conditions of network governance: Network governance in East Asia. Management Decision, 48(8): 1212–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, J.-S. 2005. A study of social trust in South Korea, with comparative perspectives. Paper presented at the 100th Annual Conference of the American Sociological Association, Philadelphia, August 13–16. http://www-irps.ucsd.edu/assets/001/503062.pdf, Accessed July 10, 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, The Peter J. Tobin College of Business, St. John’s University, 8000 Utopia Parkway, Queens, NY, 11439, USA

    Sven Horak

  2. Niederrhein University of Applied Sciences, Krefeld, Germany

    Andreas Klein

Authors
  1. Sven Horak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Horak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horak, S., Klein, A. Persistence of informal social networks in East Asia: Evidence from South Korea. Asia Pac J Manag 33, 673–694 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9416-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9416-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation