Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The contextualization and de-contextualization of Confucian morality: Making Confucianism relevant to China’s contemporary challenges in business ethics

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to serious ethical problems in China, Confucianism is being invoked as a possible solution. We argue that to apply Confucianism as a useful resource for developing business ethics in China, two processes are needed—contextualization and de-contextualization. This paper puts Confucian moral concepts back into their original context for more accurate interpretation and better understanding, and then discusses the adjustments that need to be made before applying them in today’s business environment. Five important Confucian concepts—ren, yi, li, zhi, and xin—are examined and two suggestions are provided for the effective application of Confucian morality in business ethics in present-day China: the introduction of codified ethics and a clear focus on individual behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrami, R. M., Kirby, W. C., & McFarlan, F. W. 2014. Can China lead? Reaching the limits of growth and power. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

  • Ames, R. T. 1983. The art of rulership: A study in ancient Chinese political thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. 1995. Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastin, M. 2015. Courses on ethics needed in China. Financial Times: Jan. 14.

  • Bell, D. 2010. China’s new Confucianism: Politics and everyday life in a changing society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Chan, G. K. Y. 2008. The relevance and value of Confucianism in contemporary business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77: 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W.-T. 1963. A sourcebook in Chinese philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Chen, J. 2008. Chinese law: Context and transformation. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-J. 2001. Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Chen, M.-J. 2014. Becoming ambicultural: A personal quest, and aspiration for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 39(2): 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. C. K. 2009. Intellectual property rights in China: Politics of piracy, trade and protection. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius. 1999. The Analects, Library of Chinese Classics Chinese-English ed., Y. Bojun & A. Waley (Trans.). Hunan: Hunan Publishing House.

  • Cua, A. S. (Ed.). 2012. Encyclopedia of Chinese philosophy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daxue (Great Learning). 2006. Chinese Text Project (English trans.): http://ctext.org/liji/da-xue, Accessed Feb. 12, 2015.

  • de Bary, W. 1991. The trouble with Confucianism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Deutsche Welle. 2015. China’s Xi steps up anti-corruption drive. http://www.dw.de/chinas-xi-steps-up-anti-corruption-drive/a-18217036, Accessed Feb. 15, 2015.

  • Drucker, P. F. 1999. Management challenges for the 21st century. New York: HarperCollins.

  • Drucker, P. F. 2002. Managing in the next society. New York: Routledge.

  • Economist. 2014. China with legal characteristics. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21629383-xi-jinping-invoking-rule-law-thats-risky-him-and-good-china-china-legal, Accessed Feb. 15, 2015.

  • Fang, T. 2012. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei, H.-T. 1992. From the soil—The foundations of Chinese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

  • Fung, Y.-L. 2007. A short history of Chinese philosophy. Tianjin, CN: TASS Publishing House.

  • Gardels, N. 2014. Xi launches cultural counter-revolution to restore Confucianism as China’s ideology. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-gardels/xi-jinping-confucianism_b_5897680.html, Accessed Feb. 12, 2015.

  • Graafland, J., & Zhang, L. 2014. Corporate social responsibility in China: Implementation and challenges. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23: 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. L., & Ames, R. T. 1987. Thinking through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York.

  • Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. 1993. The seven cultures of capitalism. New York: Doubleday.

  • Ho, D. Y.-F. 1976. On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4): 867–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. 2001. Culture’s consequences, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Hua, Y. 2011. China in ten words. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip, P. K. 2009a. The challenge of developing a business ethics in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88: 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ip, P. K. 2009b. Is Confucianism good for business ethics in China?. Journal of Business Ethics, 88: 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. 1991. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. 2001. Confucian trustworthiness and the practice of business in China. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11: 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K.-C. J. 2003. Confucian business ethics and the economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 43: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. Y. 2003. Do traditional values still exist in modern Chinese societies? The case of Singapore and China. Asia Europe Journal, 1: 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. S. M., Liu, X., & Liu, S. 2009. Moral schemas and business practices: The ethics of Guangzhou migrant marketers. Journal of Business Ethics, 88: 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 1998. Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organizational Studies, 19: 829–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2012. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4): 849–872.

  • Liu, T. Q. 2010. Confucianism and business practices in China. Beijing: China Financial and Economic Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. 1954. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.

  • McGregor, D. 1960. The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Mencius. 1999. Mencius, Library of Chinese Classics Chinese-English ed., D. Xia (Trans.). Hunan: Hunan Publishing House.

  • Nakajima, M. 1994. Economic development in East Asia and Confucian ethics. Social Compass, 4(1): 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, H. 1964. Ways of thinking of Eastern peoples: India, China, Tibet, Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

  • Nakane, C. 1973. Japanese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Nisbett, R. E. 2003. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. 2001. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108: 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S. G. 1993. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D., & Zhou, J. 2008. Are traditional Western ethical theories still relevant in a cross-cultural and entrepreneurial business world?. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 4(1): 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romar, E. J. 2002. Virtue is good business: Confucianism as a practical business ethic. Journal of Business Ethics, 38: 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romar, E. J. 2004. Managerial harmony: The Confucian ethics of Peter F. Drucker. Journal of Business Ethics, 51: 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. H. 1894. Chinese characteristics. New York: Fleming H. Revell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. 2003. Managing ethics in organizations: Social scientific perspectives. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Trompenaars, F. 1993. Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W.-M. 1972. Li as a process of humanization. Philosophy East and West, 22(2): 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W.-M. 1989. Centrality and commonality: An essay on Confucian religiousness. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Wall Street Journal. 2015. China’s rich seek health, spiritual fulfillment and wellbeing. Feb. 12.

  • Wang, Y. (Ed.). 2007. Deconstruction and the ethical in Asian thought. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedeman, A. 2012. Double paradox: Rapid growth and rising corruption in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Woods, P. R., & Lamond, D. A. 2011. What would Confucius do?—Confucian ethics and self-regulation in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 102: 669–683.

  • Wu, M., & Xu, E. 2012. Paternalistic leadership: From here to where?. In X. Huang & M. H. Bond (Eds.). Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research and practice: 449–466. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Xu, C. 2007. Love: Partial or equal? A comparative study of Confucian love, Mohist love and Christian love. In S. Zou & X. Yang (Eds.). Rethinking Marx, Vol. 26: Chinese philosophical studies, cultural heritage and contemporary change: 135–156. Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.

  • Xunzi. 1999. Xunzi, Library of Chinese Classics Chinese-English ed., J. Knoblock & Z. Jue (Trans.). Hunan: Hunan People’s Publishing House.

  • Yang, S., & Stening, B. W. 2013. Mao meets the market: Reconciling ideology and pragmatism in China. Management International Review, 53: 419–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, L. 2005. The structure and evolution of Chinese social stratification. Lanham: University Press of America.

  • Zhang, D. 2002. Key concepts in Chinese philosophy. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Guest Editor, two anonymous reviewers and Yves Stening for their valuable comments on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

    T. Q. Liu & Bruce W. Stening

Authors
  1. T. Q. Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruce W. Stening
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce W. Stening.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, T.Q., Stening, B.W. The contextualization and de-contextualization of Confucian morality: Making Confucianism relevant to China’s contemporary challenges in business ethics. Asia Pac J Manag 33, 821–841 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9415-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9415-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation