Skip to main content
Log in

The turtle–hare race story revisited: Social capital and resource accumulation for firms from emerging economies

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How can firms from emerging economies, given their internal resource constraints, compete effectively with established multinational enterprises (MNEs) in home markets and gain capabilities for international expansion? We develop an integrative view of resources by incorporating network-based social capital theories and articulate that the depth and nature of emerging economy firms’ external social capital determine the direction and magnitude of resource exchanges with their business partners, and thus their effectiveness in accumulating critical internal resources. Throughout the development of our theoretical framework, we have also relied on empirical evidences from various business sources, including the cases on Lenovo and Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC). We conclude with scholarly and practical implications and future research avenues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The story also implies that one can defeat a stronger opponent through unyielding perseverance, which is not our focus here.

  2. A detailed list of facts about Lenovo as well as their sources is listed in Appendix A, posted online at: http://www.utdallas.edu/~zlin.

  3. Interestingly, Lenovo forged very few business ties with indigenous PC manufacturers. This is sensible because the association with less advanced and less innovative partners would not increase or, perhaps, even decrease its net inflow of resources.

  4. A detailed list of facts about SAIC as well as their sources is listed in Appendix B, posted online at: http://www.utdallas.edu/~zlin.

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1):17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G. 2000. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of inter-firm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3):317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. 2001. How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1):139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14:33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H. 1989. Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H., & Chu, W. 2003. Beyond late development: Taiwan’ s upgrading policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17:99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. 2001. The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E., & Harrison J. S. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 124–188. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. 2000. Going global: Lessons from late movers. Harvard Business Review, 79(2):133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21:267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y. 1997. Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3):366–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y., & Ang, S. 1997. Guanxi networks and job mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces, 75(3):981–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1980. Le capital social: Notes provisoires. Actes De La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 31:2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In Richarson, J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education: 241–258. New York, NY: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. 2001. From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1):64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42:339–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. In Sutton, R., & Staw, B. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: 345–423. Westport, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T., Chen, H., & Ku, Y. 2004. Foreign direct investment and local linkages. Journal of International Business Studies, 35:320–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension. Management and Organization Review, 1(3):381–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94:S95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Gunning, J. W. 1999. Explaining African economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 37:64–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyr, D. J., & Schneider, S. C. 1996. Implications for learning: Human resource management in East–West joint ventures. Organization Studies, 17:207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T., & Teng, B. 2000. A resource-based view of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1):31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, N.,& Frost, T. 1999. Competing with giants: Survival strategies for local companies in emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 77:119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depner, H. 2005. Exporting the German model: The establishment of a new automobile industry cluster. Economic Geography, 81(1):53–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G., & Picken, J. C. 1999. Beyond productivity: How leading companies achieve superior performance by leveraging their human capital. New York, NY: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj, C., Lyles, M. A., Steensma, H. K., & Tihanyi, L. 2004. Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: The role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35:428–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and the sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12):1504–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrev, S. D., & Carroll, G. R. 2003. Size (and competition) among organizations: Modeling scale-based selection among automobile producers in four major countries, 1885–1981. Strategic Management Journal, 24:541–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1993. Internationalizing Porter’s diamond. Management International Review, 33(2):7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 2006. Comment on Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2):139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1984 (1893). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4):660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., Ritzen, J., & Woolcock, M. 2006. Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Economics & Politics, 18(2):103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2):136–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elango, B., & Pattnaik, C. 2007. Building capabilities for international operations through networks: A study of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38:541–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. 1996. Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development, 24(6):1119–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhoomand, A., & Tao, Z. 2005. Shanghai Volkswagen: Time for a radical shift of gears. Asia Case Research Center Case.

  • Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. 2000. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2):183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8):137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, T., Guthrie, D., & Wank, D. 2002. Social connections in China: Institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78:1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action: 25–56. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisinger, S. 2001. From OLI to OLMA: Incorporating higher levels of environmental and structural complexity into Eclectic Paradigm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2):257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4):293–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21:203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. 1989. Collaborate with your competitors—and win. Harvard Business Review, 67:133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, G. G. 1996. Asian business networks. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., Polos, L., & Carroll, G. R. 2003. Architecture, culture, and cascading change. Working Paper 1732, Stanford University.

  • Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search–transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1):82–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24:997–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Li, H., & Worthington, W. J., IV. 2005. Emerging markets as learning laboratories: Learning behaviors of local firms and foreign entrants in different institutional contexts. Management and Organization Review, 1(3):353–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, T. 1996. State capitalism, multinational corporations, and Chinese entrepreneurship in Singapore. In Hamilton, G. G. (Ed.), Asian business networks: 157–169. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. 2003. Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24:889–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3):249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C. 2001. Strategic alliances. In Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E., & Harrison, J. S. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management, 409–432. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21:217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. 2002. Alliance capabilities, stock market response, and long term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8):747–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmali, N., & Stone, A. 2006. Wind man. Forbes, 177(13):124–126, June 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. 1994. Collaborative approach: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, 72:96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L. A. 2001. Exchange structures in transition: Lending and trade relations in Chinese business groups. American Sociological Review, 66(3):336–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets? Harvard Business Review, 75:41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition cooperation and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3):193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. 1997. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1251–1288.

  • Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. 2002. Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23:795–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2007. Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2):227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2002. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23:469–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. 2001. Building a network theory of social capital. In Lin, N., Cook, K., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research: 3–29. Hawthorne, NY: Walter De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., & Vaughn, J. C. 1981. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46:393–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. Z. 2007. Lenovo: An example of globalization of Chinese enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 38:573–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. Z., & Liang, N. 2002. The making of a Lenovo: The role of networks. Presentation at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting in Denver.

  • Luo, Y. 1997. Partner selection and venturing success: The case of joint ventures with firms in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 8(6):648–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2000. Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4):355–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2003. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24:1315–1327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. 2002. Competitive advantages of late comer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19:467–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1):5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkhoff, T., & Gerke, S. 2002. Chinese entrepreneurship and Asian business networks. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2):242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R. 2006. Globalization, new ecologies, new zoologies, and the purported death of the eclectic paradigm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2):143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. 1991. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6):96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. 2001. China and the global economy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. 2007. Social capital, institutions and trust. Review of Social Economy, 65(1):29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S. 1998. The Haier Group (A). Harvard Business School Case.

  • Park, S. H., Chen, R., & Gallagher, S. 2002. Firm Resources as moderators of the relationships between market growth and strategic alliances in semiconductor start-ups. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3):527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2001. The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27:803–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2):275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y. 2004. Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5):1045–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M., Heath, P. S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2):492–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M., & Zhou, Q. 2005. How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22:321–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. 2001. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. The American Journal of Sociology, 107(1):33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1986. Competition in global industries: A conceptual framework. In Porter, M. (Ed.), Competition in global industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. 1993. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13:35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6:65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, G. S. 1996. Weak organization and strong linkages: Managerial ideology and Chinese family business networks. In Hamilton, G. G. (Ed.), Asian business networks: 27–42. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, T. A., Leengers, J., & Gabbay, S. M. 1999. Corporate social capital and liability. Kluwer, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. 2000. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21:369–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35:3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukstad, M. G., Chen, H., Qin, H., Ye, G.,& Yin, Z. 2001. A technology Lenovo in China. Harvard Business School Case.

  • Rumelt, R. P. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In Lamb, R. B. (Ed.), Competitive strategic management: 556–570. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff M. 1992. Social capital, labor mobility, and welfare. Rational Society, 4:157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. 2001. A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2):219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. S., & Baum, J. A. 2001. Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4):791–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J. C. 1996. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2):45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., & Lyles, M. A. 2000. Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 21:831–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21:791–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramani, M. R., & Venkatraman, N. 2003. Safeguarding investments in asymmetric interorganizational relationships: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1):46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. J., & Litschert, R. J. 1994. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: An empirical study of the Chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1):1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S., & Kuemmerle, W. 2002. Asset accumulation, interdependence and technological change: Evidence from pharmaceutical drug discovery. Strategic Management Journal, 23:619–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4):464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbruck, K., Meyer, K. E., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Organizational transformation in transition economies: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2):257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42:35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., & Lancaster, R. 2003. Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science, 49(4):383–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. 1997. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8(2):109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Nicholas, S. 2007. The formation and evolution of non-equity strategic alliances in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2):131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. 1988. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. (Eds.), Social Structures: A network approach: 477–497. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., Chen, W., & Weizhen, D. 2002. Networking guanxi. In Gold, T., Guthrie, D., & Wank, D. (Eds.), Social connections in China: Institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi: 221–241. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5:171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P. J. 1997. Asia’s new competitive game. Harvard Business Review, 75:55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., & Williamson, P. J. 2003. CP Group: From seeds to Kitchen of the World. INSEAD Case.

  • Wilson, M., Chen, S., & Erakovic, L. 2006. Dynamics of decision power in the localization process: Comparative case studies of China–Western IJVs. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(9):1547–1571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. 1998. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2):151–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Guest editors’ introduction. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42:1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. 2008. What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, forthcoming.

  • Yan, A., & Duan, J. 2003. Interpartner fit and its performance implications: A four-case study of U.S.–China joint ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(4):541–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Jiang, Y., Kang, R., & Ke, Y. 2008. A comparative analysis of internationalization of Chinese and Japanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, forthcoming.

  • Youndt, M. A., Subramaniam, M., & Snell, S. A. 2004. Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2):335–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Z., Anand, J., & Mitchell, W. 2005. A dual networks perspective on inter-organizational transfer of R&D capabilities: International joint ventures in the Chinese automotive industry. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1):127–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. 2007. How does strategic orientation matter in Chinese firms? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4):447–466.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiang (John) Lin.

Additional information

We thank Editor-in-Chief Mike Peng and the anonymous reviewers of Asia Pacific Journal of Management for their constructive suggestions for improving our manuscript. We also acknowledge the useful comments made by Richard Harrison and Roger Chen. An earlier version was presented at the 2003 Academy of International Business Annual Meeting. We are especially thankful to Greg Dess for his encouragement and support during the earlier phase of manuscript development. Donald Beebe provided able research assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, L., Lin, Z.(. & Arya, B. The turtle–hare race story revisited: Social capital and resource accumulation for firms from emerging economies. Asia Pacific J Manage 25, 251–275 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-007-9068-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-007-9068-x

Keywords

Navigation