Skip to main content
Log in

P900: A Putative Novel ERP Component that Indexes Countermeasure Use in the P300-Based Concealed Information Test

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Countermeasures pose a serious threat to the effectiveness of the Concealed Information Test (CIT). In a CIT experiment, Rosenfeld and Labkovsky in Psychophysiology 47(6):1002–1010, (2010) observed a previously unknown positive ERP component at about 900 ms post-stimulus at Fz and Cz that could potentially serve as an index of countermeasure use. Here, we explored the hypothesis that this component, termed P900, occurs in response to a signal that no further specific response is required in a trial, and could thus appear in countermeasure users that respond differentially depending on the stimulus that appears. In the present experiments, subjects viewed four non-meaningful (irrelevant) dates and one oddball date. In three experiments, we examined P900’s antecedent conditions. In the first, the unique item was a personally relevant oddball (the subject’s birthdate). In a second, the unique item was a non-personally relevant oddball (an irrelevant date in a unique font color). In a third, all dates were irrelevant. We speculated that the presence of an oddball would not be necessary for P900. All participants made countermeasure-like responses following two specific irrelevant dates. As hypothesized, P900s were seen to non-responded-to irrelevant and oddball stimuli in all subjects but not to responded-to irrelevant stimuli, and the presence of an oddball was not necessary for elicitation of P900. This finding has potential application in deception settings—the presence of a P300 accompanied by the presence of a P900 in response to non-countered stimuli could provide evidence of incriminating knowledge accompanied by the attempt to use countermeasures to evade detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a detailed explanation of the complex trial protocol, see Rosenfeld et al. (2008). The basic difference between the complex trial protocol and the typical older P300-based CIT, sometimes termed the “three-stimulus protocol,” is the grouping of stimuli that are presented to the participant. The three-stimulus protocol has a single trial type, on which one of three types of stimuli may be presented, a probe, an irrelevant, or a target (a target is a non-meaningful stimulus, like an irrelevant, that requires a special response from the participant in order to force attention to the task). In contrast, the complex trial protocol divides each trial into two separate stimulus presentation periods: during the first period either a probe or an irrelevant is presented, and during the second period either a target or a nontarget is presented, as described above.

  2. While some recent P300-based CIT research has used mental countermeasures, as those used in Rosenfeld and Labkovsky (2010), CIT countermeasures have traditionally been physical movements, such as a wiggling of the finger or toe. For example, Rosenfeld et al. (2004) instructed each participant to press a finger imperceptibly against his leg; highly similar to the overt button presses used here. We chose to use explicit movements like this because they allow the experimenter to monitor that participants are actually making responses, and they also allow for the measurement of reaction time to the button presses.

  3. We have since replicated the P900 again in a deception context, in a recent paper (in this journal) examining the effects of various numbers of countermeasures against the P300-based CIT (Labkovsky and Rosenfeld 2011). In that study, P900 was observed again in probe and noncountered stimuli but not in countered stimuli, as would be expected under our working hypothesis of the cognitive processes that lead to P900.

References

  • Ben-Shakhar, G. (2002). A critical review of the control questions test (CQT). In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 103–126). Waltham: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shakhar, G., & Dolev, K. (1996). Psycophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: Effect of mental countermeasures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 273–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donchin, E., & Coles, G. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (“lie detection”) with event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honts, C. R., Amato, S. L., & Gordon, A. K. (2001). Effects of spontaneous countermeasures used against the comparison question test. Polygraph, 30(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., Winbush, M., & Kircher, J. C. (1996). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed information test. Psychophysiology, 33(1), 84–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., Rosenfeld, J. P., & Bodenhausen, G. (2012). Combating autonomic autobiographical associations: The effect of instruction and training in strategically concealing information in the autobiographical implicit association test. Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0956797612443834.

  • Hull, J., & Harsh, J. (2001). P300 and sleep-related positive waveforms (P220, P450, and P900) have different determinants. Journal of Sleep Research, 10, 9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iacono, W. J., & Lykken, D. T. (2005). The case against polygraph tests. In D. Faigman (Ed.), Modern scientific evidence. Eagan, MN: Thomson West.

  • Kok, A. (1986). Effects of degradation of visual stimulation on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in Go/NoGo reaction tasks. Biological Psychology, 23, 21–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labkovsky, E., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2012). The P300-based complex trial protocol for concealed information detection resists any number of sequential countermeasures against up to five irrelevant stimuli. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavric, A., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Forstmeier, S. (2004). When “go” and “nogo” are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography. European Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2483–2488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meixner, J. B., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2010). Countermeasure mechanisms in a P300-based concealed information test. Psychophysiology, 47, 57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, R., & Allen, J. B. (2008). The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments: Deception detection, ERPs, and virtual mock crime scenarios. Psychophysiology, 45(2), 286–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Van Den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhoff, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulated function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Language and Cognitive Processes, 31, 785–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papa, S. M., Artieda, J., & Obeso, J. A. (1991). Cortical activity preceding self-initiated and externally triggered voluntary movement. Movement Disorders, 6, 217–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. P. (2011). P300 in detecting concealed information. In B. Verschuere, G. Ben-Shakhar & E. Meijer (Eds.), Memory detection: Theory and application of the concealed information test, (pp. 63–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., Angell, A., Johnson, M., & Qian, J. H. (1991). An ERP-based, control-question lie detector analog: Algorithms for discriminating effects within individuals’ average waveforms. Psychophysiology, 28(3), 319–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., Cantwell, G., Nasman, V. T., Wojdac, V., Ivanov, S., & Mazzeri, L. (1988). A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. International Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., & Labkovsky, E. (2010). New P300-based protocol to detect concealed information: Resistance to mental countermeasures against only half the irrelevant stimuli and a possible ERP indicator of countermeasures. Psychophysiology, 47(6), 1002–1010.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., Labkovsky, E., Winograd, M., Lui, M. A., Vandenboom, C., & Chedid, E. (2008). The complex trial protocol (CTP): A new, countermeasure-resistant, accurate P300-based method for detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 45, 906–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., Soskins, M., Bosh, G., & Ryan, A. (2004). Simple effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 41, 205–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruchkin, D. S., Grafman, J., Cameron, K., & Berndt, R. S. (2003). Working memory retention systems: a state of activated long-term memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 709–728.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 251–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolovsky, A., Rothenberg, J., Labkovsky, E., Meixner, J. B., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2011). A novel countermeasure against the reaction time index of countermeasure use in the P300-based complex trial protocol for detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 81, 60–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soskins, M., Rosenfeld, J. P., & Niendam, T. (2001). The case for peak to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at 3 Hz high pass filter settings in detection of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 173–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The National Research Council. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevena, J. A., & Miller, J. (2002). Cortical movement preparation before and after a conscious decision to move. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 162–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, M. R., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2011). Mock crime application of the complex trial protocol (CTP) P300-based concealed information test. Psychophysiology, 48, 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, M., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (2012 September 13–17) Countermeasure mechanisms in the complex trial protocol. 16th World Congress of Psychophysiology, International Organization Psychophysiology. Pisa.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John B. Meixner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meixner, J.B., Labkovsky, E., Peter Rosenfeld, J. et al. P900: A Putative Novel ERP Component that Indexes Countermeasure Use in the P300-Based Concealed Information Test. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 38, 121–132 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-013-9216-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-013-9216-7

Keywords

Navigation