Skip to main content
Log in

Time to revisit polyphasic taxonomy

  • Invited Review
  • Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 80th Anniversary Issue
  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria does not specify a working strategy, editors and reviewers of taxonomic journals commonly request a polyphasic taxonomic approach that includes phenotypic, genotypic and chemotaxonomic information for the description of novel bacterial species. Whole genome sequences provide an insight into the genetic nature of microbial species, yield new and superior tools for delineating bacterial species and for studying their phylogeny, and provide a window on an organism’s metabolic potential. These new insights and tools are gradually introduced in the polyphasic taxonomic practice. The genus Burkholderia, a controversial group of bacteria with both benign and devastating characteristics, is used as an example to show that the modern practice of polyphasic taxonomy is counterproductive in light of the tremendous number of bacterial species that awaits formal description and naming. Bacterial taxonomists must urgently reconsider how to describe and name novel bacteria in the genomic era, and should consider using a full genome sequence and a minimal description of phenotypic characteristics as a basic, sufficient, cost-effective and appropriate biological identity card for a species description.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtman M, Wagner M (2008) Microbial diversity and the genetic nature of microbial species. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:431–440. doi:10.1038/Nrmicro1872

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral GRS, Dias GM, Wellington-Oguri M, Chimetto L, Campeão ME, Thompson FL, Thompson CC (2014) Genotype to phenotype: identification of diagnostic vibrio phenotypes using whole genome sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:357–365. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.057927-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angus A, Agapakis CM, Fong S, Yerrapragada S, Estrada-de Los Santos P, Yang P, Song N, Kano S, Caballero-Mellado J, de Faria SM, Dakora FD, Weinstock G, Hirsch AM (2014) Plant-associated symbiotic Burkholderia species lack hallmark strategies required in mammalian pathogenesis. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083779

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenye T, Vandamme P (2003) Diversity and significance of Burkholderia species occupying diverse ecological niches. Environ Microbiol 5:719–729. doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00471.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coenye T, Laevens S, Willems A, Ohlen M, Hannant W, Govan JRW, Gillis M, Falsen E, Vandamme P (2001) Burkholderia fungorum sp. nov., and Burkholderia caledonica sp. nov., two new species isolated from the environment, animals and human clinical samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:1099–1107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coenye T, Goris J, Spilker T, Lipuma JJ, Vandamme P (2002) Characterization of unusual bacteria isolated from respiratory secretions of cystic fibrosis patients and description of Inquilinus limosus gen. nov. J Clin Microbiol 40:2062–2069. doi:10.1128/JCM.40.6.2062

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RR (1970) Polyphasic taxonomy of the genus vibrio: numerical taxonomy of Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and related Vibrio species. J Bacteriol 104:410–433

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Compant S, Nowak J, Coenye T, Clément C, Ait Barka E, Clement C, Barka EA (2008) Diversity and occurrence of Burkholderia spp. in the natural environment. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:607–626. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00113.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deloger M, El Karoui M, Petit MA (2009) A genomic distance based on MUM indicates discontinuity between most bacterial species and genera. J Bacteriol 191:91–99. doi:10.1128/Jb.01202-08

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deris ZZ, Van Rostenberghe H, Habsah H, Noraida R, Tan GC, Chan YY, Rosliza AR, Ravichandran M (2010) First isolation of Burkholderia tropica from a neonatal patient successfully treated with imipenem. Int J Infect Dis 14:e73–e74. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2009.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desai AP, Stanley T, Atuan M, McKey J, Lipuma JJ, Rogers B, Jerris R (2012) Use of matrix assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry in a paediatric clinical laboratory for identification of bacteria commonly isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Pathol 65:835–838. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada-de Los Santos P, Vinuesa P, Martínez-Aguilar L, Hirsch AM, Caballero-Mellado J (2013) Phylogenetic analysis of Burkholderia species by multilocus sequence analysis. Curr Microbiol 67:51–60. doi:10.1007/s00284-013-0330-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrits G, Klaassen C, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Meis JF (2005) Burkholderia fungorum septicemia. Emerg Infect Dis 11:1115–1117

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers D, Cohan FM, Lawrence JG, Spratt BG, Coenye T, Feil EJ, Stackebrandt E, Van de Peer Y, Vandamme P, Thompson FL, Swings J (2005) Re-evaluating prokaryotic species. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:733–739. doi:10.1038/Nrmicro1236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers D, Dawyndt P, Vandamme P, Willems A, Vancanneyt M, Swings J, De Vos P (2006) Stepping stones towards a new prokaryotic taxonomy. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biological Sci 361:1911–1916. doi:10.1098/Rstb.2006.1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goris J, De Vos P, Caballero-Mellado J, Park J, Falsen E, Quensen JF, Tiedje JM, Vandamme P (2004) Classification of the biphenyl and polychlorinated biphenyl-degrading strain LB400T and relatives as Burkholderia xenovorans sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1677–1681. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63101-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM (2007) DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gyaneshwar P, Hirsch AM, Moulin L, Chen W-M, Elliott GN, Bontemps C, Estrada-de Los Santos P, Gross E, Dos Reis FB, Sprent JI, Young JPW, James EK (2011) Legume-nodulating betaproteobacteria: diversity, host range, and future prospects. Mol plantmicrobe Interact MPMI 24:1276–1288. doi:10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbett DS, Taylor JW (2013) Fungal systematics: is a new age of enlightenment at hand? Nat Rev Microbiol 11:129–133. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley KA, Maiden MC (2010) BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 11:595. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-595

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM (2005) Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2567–2572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0409727102

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire B, Robbrecht E, Wyk B, Oevelen S, Verstraete B, Prinsen E, Smets E, Dessein S (2011) Identification, origin, and evolution of leaf nodulating symbionts of Sericanthe (Rubiaceae). J Microbiol 6:935–941. doi:10.1007/s12275-011-1163-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire B, Van Oevelen S, De Block P, Verstraete B, Smets E, Prinsen E, Dessein S (2012) Identification of the bacterial endosymbionts in leaf nodules of Pavetta (Rubiaceae). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:202–209. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.028019-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maiden MCJ, Bygraves JA, Feil E, Morelli G, Russell JE, Urwin R, Zhang Q, Zhou JJ, Zurth K, Caugant DA, Feavers IM, Achtman M, Spratt BG (1998) Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3140–3145. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.6.3140

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oren A, Garrity GM (2014) Then and now: a systematic review of the systematics of prokaryotes in the last 80 years. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. doi:10.1007/s10482-013-0084-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Parke JL, Gurian-Sherman D (2001) Diversity of the Burkholderia cepacia complex and implications for risk assessment of biological control strains. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:225–258. doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters C, Zlosnik JEA, Spilker T, Hird TJ, Lipuma JJ, Vandamme P (2013) Burkholderia pseudomultivorans sp. nov., a novel Burkholderia cepacia complex species from human respiratory samples and the rhizosphere. Syst Appl Microbiol 36:483–489. doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2013.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy D, Mishra AK, Lagier J-C, Padhmanabhan R, Rossi M, Sentausa E, Raoult D, Fournier P-E (2014) A polyphasic strategy incorporating genomic data for the taxonomic description of novel bacterial species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:384–391. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.057091-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richter M, Rossello-Mora R (2009) Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906412106

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Moreno ZR, Caballero-Mellado J, Coutinho BG, Mendonça-Previato L, James EK, Venturi V (2012) Common features of environmental and potentially beneficial plant-associated Burkholderia. Microb Ecol 63:249–266. doi:10.1007/s00248-011-9929-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe IC, Trujillo ME, Goodfellow M (2012) A call to arms for systematists: revitalising the purpose and practises underpinning the description of novel microbial taxa. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 101:13–20. doi:10.1007/s10482-011-9664-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe IC, Trujillo ME, Whitman WB, Goodfellow M (2013) A call to action for the international committee on systematics of prokaryotes. Trends Microbiol 21:51–52. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamames J, Rosselló-Móra R (2012) On the fitness of microbial taxonomy. Trends Microbiol 20:514–516. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.08.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tindall BJ, Rossello-Mora R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kampfer P (2010) Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:249–266. doi:10.1099/Ijs.0.016949-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oevelen S, De Wachter R, Vandamme P, Robbrecht E, Prinsen E (2004) “Candidatus Burkholderia calva” and “Candidatus Burkholderia nigropunctata” as leaf gall endosymbionts of African Psychotria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:2237–2239. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63188-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandamme P, Pot B, Gillis M, DeVos P, Kersters K, Swings J (1996) Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol Rev 60:407–438

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandamme P, Holmes B, Vancanneyt M, Coenye T, Hoste B, Coopman R, Revets H, Lauwers S, Gillis M, Kersters K, Govan JRW (1997) Occurrence of multiple genomovars of Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis patients and proposal of Burkholderia multivorans sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:1188–1200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanlaere E, Baldwin A, Gevers D, Henry D, De Brandt E, LiPuma JJ, Mahenthiralingam E, Speert DP, Dowson C, Vandamme P (2009) Taxon K, a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, comprises at least two novel species, Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:102–111. doi:10.1099/Ijs.0.001123-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete B, Van Elst D, Steyn H, Van Wyk B, Lemaire B, Smets E, Dessein S (2011) Endophytic bacteria in toxic South African plants: identification, phylogeny and possible involvement in gousiekte. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/annotation/e7fa3cdf-c7bc-439f-83a2-36da63ef6c08

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete B, Peeters C, van Wyk B, Smets E, Dessein S, Vandamme P (2014) Intraspecific variation in Burkholderia caledonica: Europe vs. Africa and soil vs. endophytic isolates. Syst Appl Microbiol in press: 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.12.001

  • Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O, Krichevsky MI, Moore LH, Moore WEC, Murray RGE, Stackebrandt E, Starr MP, Truper HG (1987) Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Oyaizu H, Yano I, Hotta H, Hashimoto Y, Ezaki T, Arakawa M (1992) Proposal of Burkholderia gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus, with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol Immunol 36:1251–1275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Iain Sutcliffe, Editor-in-Chief of Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, for his kind invitation to contribute to this festive issue of the journal and for giving us the opportunity to express some of our concerns. C. P. is indebted to the Special Research Council of Ghent University. The Burkholderia cepacia complex National Reference Center is supported by the Belgian Ministry of Social Affairs through a fund within the Health Insurance System.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Vandamme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vandamme, P., Peeters, C. Time to revisit polyphasic taxonomy. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 106, 57–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0148-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0148-x

Keywords

Navigation