Abstract
We provide a generalization of Lawler’s (Mathematical programming the state of the art. Springer, Berlin, pp 202–234, 1983) Theorem on solutions to permutation scheduling problems when the objective function admits a particular job interchange relation. We complete Lawler’s result with a straight-forward proof by induction on n, the number of jobs. A notable application is \(1 ||\varSigma {w}_{j} C_{j}\) where the objective of total weighted completion time admits WSPT (i.e., scheduling jobs in non-decreasing order of \(p_{j}/w_{j}\)). We provide new proofs by induction for the optimality of WSPT as well as for SPT in the unweighted case.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, K. R. (1974). Introduction to sequencing and scheduling. New York: Wiley.
Blażewicz, J., Ecker, K. H., Pesch, E., Schmidt, G., & Wȩglarz, J. (2001). Scheduling computer and manufacturing processes (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Conway, R. W., Maxwell, W. L., & Miller, L. W. (1967). Theory of scheduling. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., & Pólya, G. (1934). Inequalities. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Lawler, E. L. (1983). Recent results in the theory of machine scheduling. In A. Bachem, M. Grötschel, & B. Korte (Eds.), Mathematical programming the state of the art (pp. 202–234). Berlin: Springer.
Pinedo, M. (1995). Scheduling theory, algorithms, and systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Smith, W. E. (1956). Various optimizers for single-stage production. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 3(1–2), 59–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanet, J.J., Wells, C.E. An examination of job interchange relationships and induction-based proofs in single machine scheduling. Ann Oper Res 253, 345–351 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2289-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2289-y