Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Big data in humanitarian supply chain networks: a resource dependence perspective

  • Big Data Analytics in Operations & Supply Chain Management
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humanitarian operations in developing world settings present a particularly rich opportunity for examining the use of big data analytics. Focal non-governmental organizations (NGOs) often synchronize the delivery of services in a supply chain fashion by aligning recipient community needs with resources from various stakeholders (nodes). In this research, we develop a resource dependence model connecting big data analytics to superior humanitarian outcomes by means of a case study (qualitative) of twelve humanitarian value streams. Specifically, we identify the nodes in the network that can exert power on the focal NGOs based upon the respective resources being provided to ensure that sufficient big data is being created. In addition, we are able to identify how the type of data attribute, i.e., volume, velocity, veracity, value, and variety, relates to different forms of humanitarian interventions (e.g., education, healthcare, land reform, disaster relief, etc.). Finally, we identify how the various types of data attributes affect humanitarian outcomes in terms of deliverables, lead-times, cost, and propagation. This research presents evidence of important linkages between the developmental body of knowledge and that of resource dependence theory (RDT) and big data analytics. In addition, we are able to generalize RDT assumptions from the multi-tiered supply chains to distributed networks. The prescriptive nature of the findings can be used by donor agencies and focal NGOs to design interventions and collect the necessary data to facilitate superior humanitarian outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altay, N. (2008). Issues in disaster-relief logistics. In M. Gad-el-Hak (Ed.), Large-scale disasters: Prediction, control and mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altay, N., Prasad, S., & Tata, J. (2013). A dynamic model for costing disaster mitigation policies. Disasters, 37(3), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altay, N., & Labonte, M. (2014). Challenges in humanitarian information management and exchange: Evidence from Haiti. Disasters, 38(S1), S50–S72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, E., Marshall, D., & Lynch, D. (2010). Buyer supplier perspectives on supply chain relationships. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(12), 1269–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, L. (2005). The nonprofit sector: Approaches, management, policy. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, C., & Kusumoto, F. (2016). The application of Big Data in medicine: current implications and future directions. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 45, 1–9.

  • Awaysheh, A., & Klassen, R. D. (2010). The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(12), 1246–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., Chui, M., & Manyika, J. (2011). Are you ready for the era of ‘big data’. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Lusch, R. F., & Muehling, D. D. (1983). Conflict and power–dependence relations in retailer–supplier channels. Journal of Retailing, 59(4), 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Lusch, R. F., & Nicholson, C. R. (1995). Power and relationship commitment: Their impact on marketing channel member performance. Journal of Retailing, 71(4), 363–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2006). The art of the possible: Relationship management in power regimes and supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(5), 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A., Sanderson, J., & Watson, G. (2001). Supply chains and power regimes: Toward an analytic framework for managing extended networks of buyer and supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(2), 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A. Y., Ooi, Keng-Boon, Lin, B., & Tang, S. Y. (2009). Influence of interorganizational relationships on SMEs’ e-business adoption. Internet Research, 19(3), 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delen, D., Erraguntla, M., Mayer, R. J., & Wu, C. N. (2011). Better management of blood supply-chain with GIS-based analytics. Annals of Operations Research, 185(1), 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Wamba, S. F., & Papadopoulos, T. (2015). The impact of big data on world-class sustainable manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power–dependence relation. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraczkiewicz-Wronka, A., & Szymaniec, K. (2012). Resource based view and resource dependence theory in decision making process of public organisation—Research findings. Management, 16(2), 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogia, S., Barnes, M., Evelson, B., Hopkins, B., Kisker, H., Yuhanna, N., Anderson, D., Malhotra, R., et al. (2012). The big deal about big data for customer engagement. Forrester Research. https://www.forrester.com/report/The&plus%3bBig&plus%3bDeal&plus%3bAbout&plus%3bBig&plus%3bData&plus%3bFor&plus%3bCustomer&plus%3bEngagement/-/E-RES72241. Accessed March 2, 2016.

  • Hazen, B. T., Boone, C. A., Ezell, J. D., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2014). Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, B. T., Skipper, J. B., Boone, C. A., & Hill, R. R. (2016). Back in business: Operations research in support of big data analytics for operations and supply chain management. Annals of Operations Research, 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2226-0.

  • Hart, P., & Saunders, C. (1997). Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science, 8(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimovics, R. D., Herman, R. D., & Coughlin, C. L. J. (1993). Executive leadership and resource dependence in nonprofit organizations: A frame analysis. Public Administration Review, 53(5), 419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. M., & Piccolo, R. F. (2005). Funding source, board involvement techniques, and financial vulnerability in nonprofit organizations: A test of resource dependence. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, K., & Moon, M. J. (2007). The double-edged sword of public-resource dependence: The impact of public resources on autonomy and legitimacy in Korean cultural nonprofit organizations. Policy Studies Journal, 35(2), 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. J. (2005). Humanitarian knowledge management. In B. Carle & B. Van de Walle (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international ISCRAM conference (pp. 1–6). Brussels, Belgium.

  • Macedo, I. M., & Pinho, J. C. (2006). The relationship between resource dependence and market orientation. European Journal of Marketing, 40(5), 533–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manocha, I. (2009). Predict and prevent, protect and defend: Transforming defense and national security with analytics. Intelligence Quarterly, 4, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Byers, A. H., et al. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/big-data-the-next-frontier-for-innovation. Accessed March 2, 2016.

  • MacIndoe, H., & Barman, E. (2013). How organizational stakeholders shape performance measurement in nonprofits: Exploring a multidimensional measure. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 716–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIndoe, H., & Sullivan, F. (2014). Nonprofit responses to financial uncertainty: How does financial vulnerability shape nonprofit collaboration? Journal of Management and Sustainability, 4(3), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, D. M., & Meredith, J. R. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11(3), 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, S., Qiu, X., Cao, Z., & Tate, A. (2013). Technological challenges in emergency response. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 4, 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, J. (1998). Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolic, S., & Koontz, T. (2008). Nonprofit organizations in environmental management: A comparative analysis of government impacts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(3), 441–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A. (1982). Variations in decision makers’ use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 756–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, T., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Altay, N., Childe, S. J., & Fosso-Wamba, S. (2016). The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production (in press). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulraj, A., & Chen, I. J. (2007). Environmental uncertainty and strategic supply management: A resource dependence perspective and performance implications. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43(3), 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J. M., Hambrick, D. C., & MacMillan, I. C. (1984). Interorganizational dependence and forward integration. Organization Studies, 5(4), 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, S., Tata, J., Burkhardt, L., & McCarthy, E. (2013). Developmental project management in emerging countries. Operations Management Research, 6(1–2), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G., & Ramamurthy, K. (1995). The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences, 26(3), 303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2014). Big data analytics in healthcare: Promise and potential. Health Information Science and Systems, 2(3), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russom, P. (2011). Big data analytics. TDWI Best Practices Report, Fourth Quarter. http://www.tableau.com/sites/default/files/whitepapers/tdwi_bpreport_q411_big_data_analytics_tableau.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2016.

  • Sanders, N. R. (2014). Big data driven supply chain management: A framework for implementing analytics and turning information into intelligence. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr, T., & Speier-Pero, C. (2015). Data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: Current state and future potential. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(1), 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, J. (2011). Resource dependence patterns and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations (Order No. 3487466). Available from ABI/INFORM Complete. (913076046). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/913076046?accountid=14791.

  • Skinner, S. J., Gassenheime, J. B., & Kelley, S. W. (1992). Cooperation in supplier–dealer relations. Journal of Retailing, 68(2), 174–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R. M., & Patterson, K. L. (2011). The effects of perceived funding trends on non-profit advocacy. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(5), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2009). Supply chain flexibility: An inter-firm empirical study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(9), 946–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuere, B., & De Corte, J. (2014). The impact of public resource dependence on the autonomy of NPOs in their strategic decision making. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(2), 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. J. (2014). Viktor mayer-schönberger and kenneth cukier—big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. International Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E. (2013a). Click here for data scientist: Big data, predictive analytics, and theory development in the era of a maker movement supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(4), 249–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E. (2013b). Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: A revolution that will transform supply chain design and management. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamba, S. F., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., & Gnanzou, D. (2015). How ‘big data’ can make big impact: Findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. (1995). Networks of collaboration or conflict: Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (2012). Digital workplaces: Vision and reality. Business Information Review, 29(4), 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, I. F. (1979). Power and satisfaction in channels of distribution. Journal of Retailing, 55(2), 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rimi Zakaria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasad, S., Zakaria, R. & Altay, N. Big data in humanitarian supply chain networks: a resource dependence perspective. Ann Oper Res 270, 383–413 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2280-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2280-7

Keywords

Navigation