Skip to main content
Log in

Value analysis planning with goal programming

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a model to support planning decisions in the engineering methodology referred to as value analysis. A goal programming model incorporating elements of critical path method and concurrent engineering is proposed as a means to augment the planning of value analysis projects. The modeling approach builds and extends prior goal programming research by uniquely incorporating both timing and cost information to ease modeling complexity and reveal scheduling resource tradeoffs. An illustrative example is presented to demonstrate the modeling approach informational efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. M. (2014). Design for manufacturability: How to use concurrent engineering to rapidly develop low-cost, high-quality products for lean production. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avigad, G., & Moshaiov, A. (2010). Set-based concept selection in multi-objective problems involving delayed decisions. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(6), 619–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azaron, A., Katagiri, H., & Sakawa, M. (2007). Time-cost trade-off via optimal control theory in Markov PERT networks. Annals of Operations Research, 150, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowlatshahi, S. (2001). Product life cycle analysis: A goal programming approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(11), 1201–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, B. (2013). Value engineering expertise a key factor in DVG’s solid financial standing. Caribbean Business, 41(41), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filho, M. G., & Uzsoy, R. (2014). Assessing the impact of alternative continuous improvement programmes in a flow shop using system dynamics. International Journal of Production Research, 52(10), 3014–3031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. H., Golany, B., & Naseraldin, H. (2005). Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: A goal programming approach. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3/4), 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, M., Gilles, A., & Aouni, B. (2012). Resource-constrained project scheduling through the goal programming model: Integration of the manager’s preferences. International Transactions in Operational Research, 19(4), 547–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M., & Isaacs, J. (1997). Value analysis of disposal strategies for automobiles. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 33(3/4), 325–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignizio, J. (1982). Linear programming in single- and multiple-objective systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. (2004). Value analysis tear-down. New York: Industrial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, T. J., & Talluri, S. (2008). A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(3), 409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., & Krob, W. (2007). Phase reviews versus fast product development: A business case. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(3), 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladipo, O., Bolyard, C., & Mintz, M. (2014). Earned value analysis and CPM schedule review in construction. Cost Engineering, 56(4), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamghabbar, A., Yacout, S., & Ouali, M. S. (2004). Concurrent optimization of the design and manufacturing stages of product development. International Journal of Production Research, 42(21), 4495–4512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B., Chung, N.-K., & Tcha, D.-W. (1991). A parallel algorithm and duality for a fuzzy multi-objective linear fractional programming program. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 20(3), 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. L. (1972). Goal programming for decision analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Auerbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. L., & Shim, J. P. (1990). Micro management scienc (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meirina, C., Levchuk, Y., Levchuk, G., & Pattipati, K. (2008). A Markov decision problem approach to goal attainment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 38(1), 116–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, S., & Pendharkar, P. (2001). Linear models for minimizing misclassification costs in bankruptcy prediction. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 10(3), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, J. (2011). Lean production for competitive advantage. New York, NY: Taylor and Frances Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack-Johnson, B., & Liberatore, M. J. (2006). Incorporating quality considerations into project time/cost tradeoff analysis and decision making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 534–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premachandra, I. M. (1993). A goal programming model for activity crashing in project networks. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 13(6), 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullan, T. T., Bhasi, M., & Madhu, G. (2010). Application of concurrent engineering in manufacturing industry. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 23(5), 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, P., Formentini, M., Bandera, C., & Tomasella, M. (2010). Value analysis as a decision support tool in cruise ship design. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 6939–6958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schniederjans, M. J., & Hong, S. (1996). Multiobjective concurrent engineering: A goal programming approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(2), 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schniederjans, M. J. (1995). Goal programming: Methodology and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, H. (2014). Relationship management and the management of projects. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancu-Minasian, I., & Tigan, S. (1988). A stochastic approach to some linear fractional goal programming problems. Kybernetika, 24(2), 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., & Zhao, Y. (2010). The empirical relationship between quality management and the speed of new product development. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 21(4), 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., Kefan, X., Gang, C., & Ping, G. (2010). A risk analysis model in concurrent engineering product development. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30(9), 1440–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc J. Schniederjans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schniederjans, M.J., Schniederjans, D. & Cao, Q. Value analysis planning with goal programming. Ann Oper Res 251, 367–382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1882-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1882-9

Keywords

Navigation