Skip to main content
Log in

Robust scenario-based value-at-risk optimization

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops and tests a heuristic algorithm for scenario-based value-at-risk (VaR) optimization. Due to the high computational complexity of VaR optimization, conditional value-at-risk-based proxies are utilized for VaR objectives. It is shown that our heuristic algorithm obtains robust results with low computational complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1.  All optimizations are performed using IBM \(\hbox {CPLEX}^\circledR \) 12.3 solver on a server with 8 Quad-Core AMD Opteron Processors 8356 (32 cores in total) and 256Gb of RAM. Four threads are used for solving all problems and CPLEX parameters are left at their default values. The MIP solution time limit was set to 30 min.

References

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2004). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards (Tech. report). Basel: Bank for International Settlements.

  • Better, M., Glover, F., Kochenberger, G., & Wang, H. (2008). Simulation optimization: Applications in risk management. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 7(4), 571–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, J., Daubechies, I., De Mol, C., Giannone, D., & Loris, I. (2009). Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106(30), 12267–12272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delage, E., & Ye, Y. (2010). Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Operations Research, 58(3), 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaivoronski, A. A., & Pflug, G. (2005). Value-at-risk in portfolio optimization: Properties and computational approach. Journal of Risk, 7(2), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilli, M., Këllezi, E., & Hysi, H. (2006). A data-driven optimization heuristic for downside risk minimization. Journal of Risk, 8(3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh, J., & Takeda, A. (2011). On the role of norm constraints in portfolio selection. Computational Management Science, 8(4), 323–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Høyland, K., Kaut, M., & Wallace, S. W. (2003). A heuristic for moment-matching scenario generation. Computational Optimization and Applications, 24, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Y., Batta, R., & Kwon, C. (2014). Value-at-risk model for hazardous material transportation. Annals of Operations Research, 222(1), 361–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, N., Mausser, H., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Algorithms for optimization of value-at-risk. In P. M. Pardalos & V. K. Tsitsiringos (Eds.), Financial Engineering, E-commerce and Supply Chain (pp. 129–157). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mausser, H., & Romanko, O. (2012). Bias, exploitation and proxies in scenario-based risk minimization. Optimization, 61(10), 1191–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mausser, H., & Romanko, O. (2014). CVaR proxies for minimizing scenario-based value-at-risk. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 10(4), 1109–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mausser, H., & Rosen, D. (1999). Efficient risk/return frontiers for credit risk. Algo Research Quarterly, 2(4), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan, K., Pachamanova, D., & Sim, M. (2008). Incorporating asymmetric distributional information in robust value-at-risk optimization. Management Science, 54(3), 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagnoncelli, B.K., Ahmed, S., & Shapiro, A. (2008). Computational study of a chance constrained portfolio selection problem, Optimization Online. http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2008/02/1899. Accessed 5 Feb 2015.

  • Pflug, G. C. (2000). Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. In S. Uryasev (Ed.), Probabilistic Constrained Optimization (pp. 272–281). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quaranta, A. G., & Zaffaroni, A. (2008). Robust optimization of conditional value at risk and portfolio selection. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(10), 2046–2056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2, 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1443–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarykalin, S., Serraino, G., & Uryasev, S. (2008). Value-at-risk vs. conditional value-at-risk in risk management and optimization. In Z. L. Chen & S. Raghavan (Eds.), Tutorials in Operations Research (pp. 270–294). Hanover, MD: INFORMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uryasev, S., Theiler, U., & Serraino, G. (2010). Risk-return optimization with different risk-aggregation strategies. Journal of Risk Finance, 11(2), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S. W., & Ziemba, W. T. (Eds.). (2005). Applications of stochastic programming. MPS-SIAM series on pptimization, Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.

  • Wozabal, D. (2010). Value-at-risk optimization using the difference of convex algorithm. OR Spectrum (9 September 2010), 1–23. doi:10.1007/s00291-010-0225-0.

  • Wu, D., & Olson, D. (2010). Enterprise risk management: a DEA VaR approach in vendor selection. International Journal of Production Research, 48(16), 4919–4932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S., & Fukushima, M. (2009). Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management. Operations Research, 57(5), 1155–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oleksandr Romanko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romanko, O., Mausser, H. Robust scenario-based value-at-risk optimization. Ann Oper Res 237, 203–218 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1822-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1822-8

Keywords

Navigation