Skip to main content
Log in

Robust berth scheduling with uncertain vessel delay and handling time

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In container terminals, the actual arrival time and handling time of a vessel often deviate from the scheduled ones. Being the input to yard space allocation and crane planning, berth allocation is one of the most important activities in container terminals. Any change of berth plan may lead to significant changes of other operations, deteriorating the reliability and efficiency of terminal operations. In this paper, we study a robust berth allocation problem (RBAP) which explicitly considers the uncertainty of vessel arrival delay and handling time. Time buffers are inserted between the vessels occupying the same berthing location to give room for uncertain delays. Using total departure delay of vessels as the service measure and the length of buffer time as the robustness measure, we formulate RBAP to balance the service level and plan robustness. Based on the properties of the optimal solution, we develop a robust berth scheduling algorithm (RBSA) that integrates simulated annealing and branch-and-bound algorithm. To evaluate our model and algorithm design, we conduct computational study to show the effectiveness of the proposed RBSA algorithm, and use simulation to validate the robustness and service level of the RBAP formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, G. G., Lawphongpanich, S., & Thurman, K. P. (1994). Optimizing ship berthing. Naval Research Logistics, 41(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, C. Y., Tan, K. C., Liu, D. K., & Lin, C. J. (2008). Multi-objective and prioritized berth allocation in container ports. Annals of Operations Research, 180(1), 63–103. doi:10.1007/s10479-008-0493-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, A., Nishimura, E., & Papadimitriou, S. (2001). The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 35(4), 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, A., Nishimura, E., & Papadimitriou, S. (2003). Berth allocation problem with service priority. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 37(5), 437–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, A., Nishimura, E., Hattori, M., & Papadimitriou, S. (2007). Berth allocation at indented berths for mega-containerships. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(2), 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., & Moon, K. C. (2003). Berth scheduling by simulated annealing. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 37(6), 541–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts, O., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2008). Proactive and reactive strategies for resource- constrained project scheduling with uncertain resource availabilities. Journal of Scheduling, 11(2), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leus, R., & Herroelen, W. (2007). Scheduling for stability in single-machine production systems. Journal of Scheduling, 10(3), 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. L., Cai, X., & Lee, C. Y. (1998). Scheduling with multiple-job-on-one-processor pattern. IIE Transactions on Scheduling and Logistics, 30(5), 433–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, A. (1998). The berth planning problem. Operations Research Letters, 22(2–3), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, R., & Teo, C. P. (2006). Berth management in container terminal: the template design problem. OR-Spektrum, 28(4), 495–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, E., Imai, A., & Papadimitriou, S. (2001). Berth allocation planning in the public berth system by genetic algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(2), 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. M., & Kim, K. H. (2003). A scheduling method for berth and quay cranes. OR-Spektrum, 25(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vonder, S., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2008). Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling: an experimental analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3), 723–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Lim, A. (2007). A stochastic beam search for the berth allocation problem. Decision Support Systems, 42(4), 2186–2196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, S., & Chang, C. (1998). A network model for gate assignment. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 32(2), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, S., & Huo, C. (2001). Optimization of multiple objective gate assignments. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice, 35(5), 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, S., Shieh, C., & Chen, M. (2002). A simulation framework for evaluating airport gate assignments. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice, 36(10), 885–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G., & Qi, X. T. (2004). Disruption management: framework, models and applications. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Liu, J., Wan, Y., Murty, K. G., & Linn, R. J. (2003). Storage space allocation in container terminals. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 37(10), 883–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiushuang Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Chen, Q. & Quan, X. Robust berth scheduling with uncertain vessel delay and handling time. Ann Oper Res 192, 123–140 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0820-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0820-0

Keywords

Navigation