Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Designing optimal global supply chains at Dow AgroSciences

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design of the underlying supply chain network can have a tremendous impact on the profitability, manageability, and level of risk of a global supply chain. Taxes, duties, and tariffs vary from country to country as well as trading bloc to trading bloc and can consume as much as 10% of the revenues of certain products. In the highly regulated business environment of agricultural chemicals, the country of origin of an active ingredient can determine where the final product can be marketed and the amount of taxes and duties applied to the product, making it necessary to trace all batches of product through many layers of the supply chain to their sources. This article presents a mixed integer linear programming model in use at Dow AgroSciences LLC that simultaneously optimizes the network design underlying global supply chains and the monthly production and shipping schedules for maximum profitability. This work contributes to the supply chain design literature by demonstrating a novel method of tracing products to their source for inventory valuation, taxation, and duty computation in a production environment where the products change into other products as they pass through nodes in the network. It also demonstrates an iterative scheme for determining unit fixed costs for fixed cost allocation for the same purposes. Finally, it provides a case study of a supply chain design initiative in a global enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeder, C., Preusser, M., & Hartl, R. F. (2009). Simulation and optimization of supply chains: alternative or complementary approaches? OR Spectrum, 31(1), 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen, B. C., Brown, G. G., Harrison, T. P., & Trafton, L. L. (1995). Global supply chain management at digital equipment corporation. Interfaces, 25(1), 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, J. B. (2001). Handbook of supply chain management. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berning, G., Brandenburg, M., Gursoy, K., Kussi, J. S., Mehta, V., & Tolle, F.-J. (2004). Integrating collaborative planning and supply chain optimization for the chemical process industry (I)—methodology. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28, 913–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berning, G., Brandenburg, M., Gursoy, K., Mehta, V., & Tolle, F.-J. (2002). An integrated system solution for supply chain optimization in the chemical process industry. OR Spectrum, 24, 371–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidhandi, H. M., Yusuff, R. M., Ahmad, M. H., & Bakar, M. R. (2009). Development of a new approach for deterministic supply chain network design. European Journal of Operational Research, 198, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, M., & Tölle, F.-J. (2009). MILP-based campaign scheduling in a specialty chemicals plant: a case study. OR Spectrum, 31(1), 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canel, C., & Khumawala, B. M. (1997). Multi-period international facilities location: an algorithm and application. International Journal of Production Research, 35(7), 1891–1910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z.-L., & Pundoor, G. (2006). Order assignment and scheduling in a supply chain. Operations Research, 54(3), 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, W.-Y. K., & Chhajed, D. (2005). Multi-channel supply chain design in B2C electronic commerce. In J. Guenes & P. M. Pardalos (Eds.), Supply chain optimization (pp. 145–168). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. A., & Lee, H. L. (1988). Strategic analysis of integrated production-distribution models and methods. Operations Research, 36(2), 216–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. A., & Moon, S. (1990). Impact of production scale economies, manufacturing complexity, and transportation costs on supply chain facility networks. Journal of Manufacturing Operations Management, 3, 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickersbach, J. T. (2006). Supply chain management with APO. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettl, M., Feigin, G. E., Lin, G. Y., & Yao, D. D. (2000). A supply network model with base-stock control and service requirements. Operations Research, 48(2), 216–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrio, J., & Wassick, J. (2008). Chemical supply chain network optimization. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 32, 2481–2504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A. W., & Graves, G. W. (1974). Multicommodity distribution system design by benders decomposition. Management Science, 20(5), 822–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, I. (2005). Enterprise-wide optimization: a new frontier in process systems engineering. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 51(7), 1846–1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2006). Operations management (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2002). How supply chain glitches torpedo shareholder value. Supply Chain Management Review, 6, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2003). The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder calue. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrah, A. I., Johnson, E., & Neubert, L. C. (2009). Large-scale, less-than-truckload service network design. Operations Research, 57(3), 609–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannegiesser, M., Günther, H.-O., van Beek, P., Grunow, M., & Habla, C. (2009). Value chain management for commodities: a case study. OR Spectrum, 31(1), 63–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreipl, S., & Pinedo, M. (2004). Planning and scheduling in supply chains: an overview of issues in practice. Production and Operations. Management, 13(1), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. M. (2002). Supply chain optimization models in a chemical company. ScmEcWorkshop, University of Florida. Gainesville, FL, USA.

  • Magnanti, T. L., & Wong, R. T. (1984). Network design and transportation planning: models and systems. Transportation Science, 18(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel, A. (2005). The design of production distribution networks: a mathematical programming approach. In J. Guenes & P. M. Pardalos (Eds.), Supply chain optimization (pp. 265–305). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meixell, M. J., & Gargeya, V. B. (2005). Global supply chain design: a literature review and critique. Transportation Research Part E, 41(6), 531–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T., & de Matta, R. (2008). A global supply chain profit maximization and transfer pricing model. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo, Y., & Harrison, T. P. (2005). A conceptual framework for robust supply chain design under demand uncertainty. In J. Guenes & P. M. Pardalos (Eds.), Supply chain optimization (pp. 243–263). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paquet, M., Martel, A., & Desaulniers, G. (2004). Including technology selection decisions in manufacturing network design models. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 17(2), 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, U., Scheller-Wolf, A., & Tayur, S. (2000). Development of a rapid-response supply chain at caterpillar. Operations Research, 48(2), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravi, R., & Sinha, A. (2006). Approximation algorithms for problems combining facility location and network design. Operations Research, 54(1), 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, N. (2005). Process industry supply chains: advances and challenges. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 29, 1225–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. F. (1999). Bottom-up vs. top-down approaches to supply chain modeling. In S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan, & M. Magazine (Eds.), Quantitative models for supply chain management (pp. 737–759). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2004). Managing the supply chain. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitter, J. M., Hurkens, C. A., de Kok, A. G., Lenstra, J. K., & Negenman, E. G. (2005). Linear programming models with planned lead times for supply chain operations planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 163, 706–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torabi, S. A., & Hassini, E. (2008). An interactive possibilistic programming approach for multiple objective supply chain master planning. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159(2), 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, C. J., & Goetschalckx, M. (2001). A global supply chain model with transfer pricing and transportation cost allocation. European Journal of Operations Research, 129, 134–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, F., Wassick, J. M., & Grossman, I. E. (2009). Risk management for global supply chain planning under uncertainty: models and algorithms. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 55(4), 931–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Bassett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bassett, M., Gardner, L. Designing optimal global supply chains at Dow AgroSciences. Ann Oper Res 203, 187–216 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0802-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0802-2

Keywords

Navigation