Skip to main content
Log in

Depreciation games

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to show how Game Theory can be used in the day-to-day running of a company. No precedent, as far as we know, in the literature of the application of Cooperative Game Theory in order to obtain new depreciation methods for a fixed asset which is owned by a company. To this end, we will first illustrate the usual depreciation methods employed in accountancy. Then, with the objective of finding new depreciation methods, we will establish the relationship between Game Theory and Accountancy. On the basis of this relationship we introduce some new depreciation methods. Finally, a family of solutions is defined which improves the properties of traditional and previously introduced methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aivazian, V. A., & Callen, J. L. (1983). Core theory and uniformity in accounting: rationalizing the accounting rulemaker. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcelus, F. J., Bhadury, J., & Srinivasan, G. (1997). On the interaction between indirect cost allocations and the firm’s objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 102, 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callen, J. L. (1978). Financial cost allocations: a game-theoretic approach. In The accounting review (pp. 303–308).

  • Cushing, B. E. (1999). Economic analysis of accountants’ ethical standards: the case of audit opinion shopping. Accounting and Public Policy, 18, 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (2005a). IFRS in your pocket 2005.

  • Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (2005b). Deloitte’s comparison of international financial reporting standards and United States GAAP.

  • Dubey, P. (1982). The Shapley value as Aircraft Landing Fees. Management Science, 28, 869–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • FASB (2004). FASB and IASB discuss plans for the future. http://www.fasb.org.

  • FASB (2005a). Memorandum of understanding. http://www.fasb.org.

  • FASB (2005b). Statements of financial accounting standards. http://www.fasb.org.

  • Kimmel, P. D., Weygandt, J. J., & Kieso, D. E. (2004). Accounting principles (7th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliger, D., & Levikson, B. (2002). Pricing no claims discount systems. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. C. (1970). Marginal-cost pricing with joint costs. Economic Journal, 80(318), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. C. (1974). A simple expression for the nucleolus in a special case. International Journal of Game Theory, 3, 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. C. (1975). Common costs, fixed charges, clubs and games. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(1), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. C., & Owen, G. (1973). A simple expression for the Shapley value in a special case. Management Science, 20, 370–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. C., & Owen, G. (1976). A further note on the nucleolus of the airport game. International Journal of Game Theory, 5, 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1987). Ambiguity and accounting: the elusive link between information and decision making. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal of the European Union (2002). Regulation 1606/2002 of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. http://europa.eu.int.

  • Official Journal of the European Union (2003). Regulation 1725/2003 of 29 September 2003 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with regulation 1606/2002, July 19, 2002. http://europa.eu.int.

  • Owen, G. (1995). Game theory (3rd ed.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. (1969). The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17, 1163–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In H. W. Kuhn & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Annals of Mathematics Studies : Vol. 28. Contributions to the theory of games II (pp. 307–317). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. (1962). Incentives, decentralized control, the assignment of joint costs and internal pricing. Management Science, April 1962, 325–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijs, S. H., & Driessen, T. S. H. (1986). Game theory and cost allocation problems. Management Science, 32, 1015–1028.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Aparicio.

Additional information

Financial support from the Generalitat Valenciana through project GV05/077 is gratefully acknowledged by J. Aparicio.

Financial support from the Generalitat Valenciana through project GRUPOS04/79 and from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia through project HI2002/0032 are gratefully acknowledged by J. Sánchez-Soriano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aparicio, J., Sánchez-Soriano, J. Depreciation games. Ann Oper Res 158, 205–218 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0238-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0238-5

Keywords

Navigation