Skip to main content
Log in

Multitiered Supply Chain Networks: Multicriteria Decision—Making Under Uncertainty

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a supply chain network model with multiple tiers of decision-makers, consisting, respectively, of manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, who can compete within a tier but may cooperate between tiers. We consider multicriteria decision-making for both the manufacturers and the distributors whereas the retailers are subject to decision-making under uncertainty since the demands associated with the product are random. We derive the optimality conditions for the decision-makers, establish the equilibrium conditions, and derive the variational inequality formulation. We then utilize the variational inequality formulation to provide both qualitative properties of the equilibrium product shipment, service level, and price pattern and to propose a computational procedure, along with convergence results. This is the first supply chain network model to capture both multicriteria decision-making and decision-making under uncertainty in an integrated equilibrium framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, J.R.T. 2000. Introduction to Materials Management, 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anupindi, R. and Y. Bassok. 1996. “Distribution Channels, Information Systems and Virtual Centralization.” In Proceedings of the Manufacturing and Service Operations Management Society Conference, pp. 87–92.

  • Bazaraa, M.S., H.D. Sherali, and C.M. Shetty. 1993. Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms. New York; John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B.M. 1998. “Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Models and Methods,” International Journal of Production Economics 55, 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovet, D. 2000. Value Nets: Breaking the Supply Chain to Unlock Hidden Profits. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramel, J. and D. Simchi-Levi. 1997. The Logic of Logistics: Theory, Algorithms and Applications for Logistics Management. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chankong, V. and Y.Y. Haimes. 1983 Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology. North-Holland, New York.

  • Cournot, A.A. 1838. Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth. English translation, England: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos, S. and A. Nagurney. 1987. “Oligopolistic and Competitive Behavior of Spatially Separated Markets. Regional Science and Urban Economics 17, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo, C. 1999. Logistics Systems Analysis. Germany: Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J., D. Zhang, and A. Nagurney. 2002. “Supply Chain Networks with Multicriteria Decision Makers.” In M.A.P. Taylor (ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory in the 21st Century, pp. 170–196, Amsterdam, Pergamon: The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J., D. Zhang, and A. Nagurney. 2004. “A Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model with Random Demands.” European Journal of Operational Research 156, 194–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federgruen, A. 1993. “Centralized Planning Models for Multi-Echelon Inventory Systems under Uncertainty.” In S.C. Graves, A.H.G. Rinooy Kan, and P. Zipkin (eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, volume on Logistics of Production and Inventory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science. pp. 133–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federgruen, A. and P. Zipkin. 1986. “An Inventory Model with Limited Production Capacity and Uncertain Demands I: The Average Cost Criterion.” Mathematics of Operations Research 11, 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1970. Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabay, D. and H. Moulin. 1980. “On the Uniqueness and Stability of Nash Equilibria in Non-cooperative Games.” In A. Bensoussan, P. Kleindorfer, and C.S. Tapiero, (eds.), Applied Stochastic Control of Econometrics and Management Science. North-Holland. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Ganeshan, R., E. Jack, M.J. Magazine, and P. Stephens. 1998. “A Taxonomic Review of Supply Chain Management Research.” In S. Tayur, M. Magazine, and R. Ganeshan (eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. Massachusetts: Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 531–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D., K. Button, and S. Brewer. (eds.), 2001. Handbook of Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Elsevier Science, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • lida, T. 2002. “A Non-Stationary Periodic Review Production-Capacity Model with Uncertain Production Capacity and Uncertain Demand.” European Journal of Operations Research 140, 670–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. and H. Raiffa. 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinderlehrer, D. and G. Stampacchia. 1980. An Introduction to Variational Inequalities and their Application. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpelevich, G.M. 1977. “The Extragradient Method for Finding Saddle Points and Other Problems.” Matekon 13, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, P.J. and L. Li. 1997. “Pricing, Production, Scheduling, and Delivery-Time Competition.” Operations Research 4, 407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. and C. Billington. 1993. “Material Management in Decentralized Supply Chains.” Operations Research 41, 835–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S.A. and K.F. McCardle. 1997. “The Competitive Newsboy.” Operations Research 45, 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, S. and G.V. Ryzin. 2001. “Inventory Competition Under Dynamic Consumer Choice.” Operations Research 49, 646–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J.T. (ed.). 2001. Supply Chain Management. California: Sage Publishers, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T.C. 2001. Hierarchical Operations and Supply Chain Planning. England: Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. 1999. Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach. second and revised edition, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. and J. Dong. 2002. Supernetworks: Decision-Making for the Information Age. Chelthenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., J. Dong, and D. Zhang. 2002. “A Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model.” Transportation Research E 38, 281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., J. Loo, J. Dong, and D. Zhang. 2002. “Supply Chain Networks and Electronic Commerce: A Theoretical Perspective.” Netnomics 4, 187–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. and L. Zhao. 1993. “Networks and Variational Inequalities in the Formulation and Computation of Market Disequilibria: The Case of Direct Demand Functions. Transportation Science 27, 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J.F. 1950. “Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games.” In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA vol. 36, pp. 48–49.

  • Nash, J.F. 1951. “Noncooperative Games.” Annals of Mathematics 54, 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, C.C. 1996. Supply Chain Optimization: Building a Total Business Network. San Francisco, California: Berrett-Kochler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, C.C. 1999. Advanced Supply Chain Management: How to Build a Sustained Competitive Advantage. San Francisco, California: Berrett-Kochler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slats, P.A., B. Bhola, J.J. Evers, and G. Dijkhuizen. 1995. “Logistic Chain Modelling.” European Journal of Operations Research 87, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtler, H. and C. Kilger (eds.), 2002. Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning. Germany: Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, H. and S. Chang. 1999. “Manufacturing Supply Chain Practices in PC Industry: A View from OEM Manufacturers.” The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Working Paper.

  • Yan, Y. and G. Hao. 2001. “Production Loading Planning for Quick Response Manufacturing Systems.” The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Working Paper.

  • Yan, H., Z. Yu, and E.T.C. Cheng. 2001. “A Strategic Model for Supply Chain Design with Logical Constraints: Formulation and Solutions.” The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Working Paper.

  • Yu, P.L. 1985. Multiple Criteria Decision Making—Concepts, Techniques, and Extensions. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Z., H. Yan, and E.T.C. Cheng. 2001a. “Modeling the Benefits of Information Sharing-Based Supply Chain Partnerships.” to appear in Journal of the Operational Research Society

  • Yu, Z., H. Yan, and E.T.C. Cheng. 2001b. “Benefits of Information Sharing with Supply Chain Partnerships.” Journal of Industrial Management & Data Systems 101, 114–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. and A. Nagurney. 1996. “Stability Analysis of an Adjustment Process for Oligopolistic Market Equilibrium Modeled as a Projected Dynamical Systems.” Optimization 36, 263–285.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to June Dong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dong, J., Zhang, D., Yan, H. et al. Multitiered Supply Chain Networks: Multicriteria Decision—Making Under Uncertainty. Ann Oper Res 135, 155–178 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-6239-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-6239-3

Keywords

Navigation