Erratum to: Analog Integr Circ Sig Process (2012) 73:989–992 DOI 10.1007/s10470-012-9907-7
Unfortunately, a typo such that the decimal point is misplaced in values of Fig 3. It has been corrected here.
-
1.
In Fig. 3(a), R4 = 12.42 \( \Upomega \) instead of 124.2\( \Upomega \)
-
2.
In Fig. 3(b), R4 = 59.8 \( \Upomega \) instead of 598 \( \Upomega \)
-
3.
In Fig. 3(c), C2 = 0.47 nF instead of 4.7 nF
-
4.
In Fig. 3(d), C1 = 0.47 nF instead of 4.7 nF, C2 = 0.47 nF instead of 4.7 nF
-
5.
In Fig. 3(e), C1 = 0.47 nF instead of 4.7 nF, C2 = 0.47 nF instead of 4.7 nF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s10470-012-9907-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abuelma’atti, M.T., Khalifa, Z.J. Erratum to: Comment on ‘Discussion on Barkhausen and Nyquist stability criteria’. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 75, 195 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-013-0035-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-013-0035-9