Abstract
School safety is of great concern for prevention researchers, school officials, parents, and students, yet there are a dearth of assessments that have operationalized school safety from an organizational framework using objective tools and measures. Such a tool would be important for deriving unbiased assessments of the school environment, which in turn could be used as an evaluative tool for school violence prevention efforts. The current paper presents a framework for conceptualizing school safety consistent with Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) model and social disorganization theory, both of which highlight the importance of context as a driver for adolescents’ risk for involvement in substance use and violence. This paper describes the development of a novel observational measure, called the School Assessment for Environmental Typology (SAfETy), which applies CPTED and social disorganizational frameworks to schools to measure eight indicators of school physical and social environment (i.e., disorder, trash, graffiti/vandalism, appearance, illumination, surveillance, ownership, and positive behavioral expectations). Drawing upon data from 58 high schools, we provide preliminary data regarding the validity and reliability of the SAfETy and describe patterns of the school safety indicators. Findings demonstrate the reliability and validity of the SAfETy and are discussed with regard to the prevention of violence in schools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astor, R. A., & Meyer, H. A. (2001). The conceptualization of violence-prone school subcontexts: Is the sum of the parts greater than the whole? Urban Education, 36(3), 374–399.
Astor, R. A., Meyer, H. A., & Behre, W. J. (1999). Unowned places and times: Maps and interviews about violence in high schools. American Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 3–42.
Astor, R. A., Meyer, H. A., & Pitner, R. O. (2001). Elementary and middle school students’ perceptions of violence-prone school subcontexts. The Elementary School Journal, 101(5), 511–528.
Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, P. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
Beyers, J. M., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Neighborhood structure, parenting processes, and the development of youths’ externalizing behaviors: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1–2), 35–53.
Birnbaum, A. S., Lytle, L. A., Hannan, P. J., Murray, D. M., Perry, C. L., & Forester, J. L. (2003). School functioning and violent behavior among young adolescents: A contextual analysis. Health Education Research, 18(3), 389–403.
Boardman, J. D., Finch, B. K., Ellison, C. G., Williams, D. R., & Jackson, J. S. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 151–165.
Bosch, S. F. (2006). Research priorities: How facilities affect learning outcomes. In C. K. Tanner & J. A. Lackney (Eds.), Educational facilities planning: Leadership, architecture and management (pp. 323–347). Boston: Pearson Education.
Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 361–382.
Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E., Debnam, K. J., & Lindstrom Johnson, S. (2014). Measuring school climate: A focus on safety, engagement, and the environment. Journal of School Health, 84, 593–604. doi:10.1111/josh.12186.
Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1981). Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Cisneros, H. G. (1995). Defensible space: Deterring crime and building community. Washington: U.S. Department of Housing and Human Development.
Cohen, D. A., Mason, K., Bedimo, A., Scribner, R., Basolo, V., & Farley, T. A. (2003). Neighborhood physical conditions and health. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 467–471.
Crowe, T. D. (1991). Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts. Louisville: National Crime Prevention Institute.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Healthy School Environments Assessment Tool (HealthySEAT). Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/schools/healthyseat/
Furr-Holden, C. D. M., Campbell, K. D. M., Milam, A. J., Smart, M. J., Ialongo, N. A., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Metric properties of the neighborhood inventory for environmental typology (NIfETy): An environmental assessment tool for measuring indicators of violence, alcohol, tobacco, and other drug exposures. Evaluation Review, 34(3), 159–184.
Furr-Holden, C. D. M., Lee, M. H., Milam, A. J., Johnson, R. M., Lee, K. S., & Ialongo, N. S. (2011a). The growth of neighborhood disorder and marijuana use among urban adolescents: A case for policy and environmental interventions. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(3), 371.
Furr-Holden, C. D. M., Milam, A. J., Reynolds, E. K., MacPherson, L., & Lejuez, C. W. (2011b). Exposure to hazardous neighborhood environments in late childhood and anxiety. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(7), 876–883.
Furr-Holden, C. D. M., Milam, A. J., Reynolds, E. K., MacPherson, L., & Lejuez, C. W. (2012). Disordered neighborhood environments and risk-taking propensity in late childhood through adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(1), 100–102.
Furr-Holden, C. D. M., Smart, M. J., Pokorni, J. L., Ialongo, N. S., Leaf, P. J., Holder, H. D., & Anthony, J. C. (2008). The NIfETy method for environmental assessment of neighborhood-level indicators of violence, alcohol, and other drug exposure. Prevention Science, 9(4), 245–255.
Gregory, A., Cornell, D., & Fan, X. (2011). The relationship of school structure and support to suspension rates for Black and White high school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 904–934.
Hu, L., & Bentler, H. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A MultiDisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
Kitsantas, A., Ware, H. W., & Martinez-Arias, R. (2004). Students’ perceptions of school safety: Effects by community, school environment, and substance use variables. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 24(4), 412–430.
Koth, C. W., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (2008). A multilevel study of predictors of student perceptions of school climate: The effect of classroom-level factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 96–104.
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309–337.
Mair, J. S., & Mair, M. (2003). Violence prevention and control through environmental modifications. Annual Review of Public Health, 24(1), 209.
Mayer, M. J., & Leone, P. E. (1999). A structural analysis of school violence and disruption: Implications for creating safer schools. Education & Treatment of Children, 22(3), 333–356.
Milam, A., Furr-Holden, D., Cooley-Strickland, M., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. (2014). Risk for exposure to alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs on the route to and from school: The role of alcohol outlets. Prevention Science, 15(1), 12–21. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9843-y.
Milam, A. J., Furr-Holden, C. D. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Perceived school and neighborhood safety, neighborhood violence and academic achievement in urban school children. The Urban Review, 42(5), 458–467.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Macmillan.
Newman, O. (1995). Defensible space: A new physical planning tool for urban revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(2), 149–155.
Newman, O. (1996). Creating defensible space. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Plank, S. B., Bradshaw, C. P., & Young, H. (2009). An application of “Broken-windows” and related theories to the study of disorder, fear, and collective efficacy in schools. American Journal of Education, 115(2), 227–247.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774. doi:10.1086/229068.
Samspon, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603–651.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas (rev ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Uline, C., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2008). The walls speak: The interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 56–73.
Van Dorn, R. A. (2004). Correlates of violent and nonviolent victimization in a sample of public high school students. Violence and Victims, 19(3), 303–320.
Wallis, A., & Ford, D. (1981). Crime prevention through environmental design: The school demonstration in Broward County, Florida: Executive summary. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Westinghouse Electric. (1977a). Crime prevention through environmental design. CPTED program manual, Vol. 1: Planning and implementation manual. Arlington: Westinghouse Electric.
Westinghouse Electric. (1977b). Crime prevention through environmental design. CPTED program manual, Vol. 2: Strategies and directives manual. Arlington: Westinghouse Electric.
Wilcox, P., Augustine, M. C., & Clayton, R. R. (2006). Physical environment and crime and misconduct in Kentucky schools. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27(3), 293–313.
Acknowledgments
Support for this project comes from the U.S. Department of Education, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the William T. Grant Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any conflicts that would influence the findings.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bradshaw, C.P., Milam, A.J., Furr-Holden, C.D.M. et al. The School Assessment for Environmental Typology (SAfETy): An Observational Measure of the School Environment. Am J Community Psychol 56, 280–292 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9743-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9743-x