Abstract
Network analysis and GIS enable the presentation of meaningful data about organizational relationships and community characteristics, respectively. Together, these tools can provide a concrete representation of the ecological context in which coalitions operate, and may help coalitions identify opportunities for growth and enhanced effectiveness. This study uses network analysis and GIS mapping as part of an evaluation of the One Strong ‘Ohana (OSO) campaign. The OSO campaign was launched in 2012 via a partnership between the Hawai‘i Children’s Trust Fund (HCTF) and the Joyful Heart Foundation. The OSO campaign uses a collaborative approach aimed at increasing public awareness of child maltreatment and protective factors that can prevent maltreatment, as well as enhancing the effectiveness of the HCTF Coalition. This study focuses on three elements of the OSO campaign evaluation: (1) Network analysis exploring the relationships between 24 active Coalition member organizations, (2) GIS mapping of responses to a randomized statewide phone survey (n = 1,450) assessing awareness of factors contributing to child maltreatment, and (3) Combined GIS maps and network data, illustrating opportunities for geographically-targeted coalition building and public awareness activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, N. E., Javdani, S., Lehrner, A. L., & Walden, A. L. (2012). “Changing the Text”: Modeling council capacity to produce institutionalized change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(3–4), 317–331.
Barile, J. P., Darnell, A. J., Erickson, S. W., & Weaver, S. R. (2012). Multilevel measurement of dimensions of collaborative functioning in a network of collaboratives that promote child and family well-being. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1–2), 270–282.
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21(4), 375–395.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Butterfoss, F. D. (2007). Coalitions and partnerships in community health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Butterfoss, F. D., & Kegler, M. C. (2009). The community coalition action theory. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (2nd ed., pp. 237–276). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Collins, D., Johnson, K., & Becker, B. J. (2007). A meta-analysis of direct and mediating effects of community coalitions that implemented science-based substance abuse prevention interventions. Substance Use and Misuse, 42(6), 985–1007.
Daro, D., & Dodge, K. A. (2009). Creating community responsibility for child protection: Possibilities and challenges. The Future of Children, 19(2), 67–93. doi:10.1353/foc.0.0030.
Dearing, J. W. (2008). Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(2), 99–108.
Doom, J. R., Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A., & Dackis, M. N. (2013). Child maltreatment and gender interactions as predictors of differential neuroendocrine profiles. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.019.
Feighery, E., & Rogers, T. (1990). Building and maintaining effective coalitions. Health Promotion Resource Center, Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention.
Feinberg, M. E., Bontempo, D. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008). Predictors and level of sustainability of community prevention coalitions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(6), 495–501. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.030.
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Nowell, B., & Yang, H. (2007). Putting the system back into systems change: A framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(3–4), 197–215.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
Gregson, J., Sowa, M., & Flynn, H. K. (2011). Evaluating form and function of regional partnerships: Applying social network analysis to the Network for a Healthy California, 2001–2007. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 43(4), S67–S74.
Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/.
Hawe, P., Shiell, A., & Riley, T. (2009). Theorising interventions as events in systems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43(3–4), 267–276.
Herman, E. J., Keller, A., Davis, A., Ehrensberger, R., Telleen, S., & Kurz, R. (2011). A model-driven approach to qualitatively assessing the added value of community coalitions. Journal of Urban Health, 88(1), 130–143.
Javdani, S., & Allen, N. E. (2011). Proximal outcomes matter: A multilevel examination of the processes by which coordinating councils produce change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1–2), 12–27.
Kegler, M. C., Rigler, J., & Honeycutt, S. (2010). How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? A multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 90.
Kegler, M. C., & Swan, D. W. (2011). An initial attempt at operationalizing and testing the community coalition action theory. Health Education & Behavior, 38(3), 261–270.
Lanier, P., Johnson-Reid, M., Stalschmidt, M. J., Drake, B., & Constantino, J. (2010). Child maltreatment and pediatric health outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 35(5), 511–522. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp086.
Lounsbury, D. W., & Mitchell, S. G. (2009). Introduction to special issue on social ecological approaches to community health research and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3–4), 213–220.
Luke, D. A. (2005). Getting the big picture in community science: Methods that capture context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3–4), 185–200.
Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development. Retrieved from https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-nested_networked.pdf.
Norman, R. E., Byambaa, M., De, R., Butchart, A., Scott, J., & Vos, T. (2012). The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 9(11), e1001349. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349.s056.
Nowell, B. (2009). Profiling capacity for coordination and systems change: The relative contribution of stakeholder relationships in interorganizational collaborative. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3–4), 196–212.
Nowell, B., & Foster-Fishman, P. (2011). Examining multi-sector community collaborative as vehicles for building organizational capacity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3–4), 193–207.
O’Donnell, M., Nassar, N., Leonard, H., Mathews, R., Patterson, Y., & Stanley, F. (2010). Monitoring child abuse and neglect at a population level: Patterns of hospital admissions for maltreatment and assault. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(11), 823–832. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.04.003.
O’Donnell, C. R., Tharp, R. G., & Wilson, K. (1993). Activity settings as the unit of analysis: A theoretical basis for community intervention and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(4), 501–520.
Provan, K. G., Veazie, M. A., Staten, L. K., & Teufel-Shone, N. I. (2005). The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 603–613.
Shin, S. H., & Miller, D. P. (2012). A longitudinal examination of childhood maltreatment and adolescent obesity: Results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (AddHealth) Study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 36(2), 84–94. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.08.007.
Turrini, A., Cristofoli, D., Frosini, F., & Nasi, G. (2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Administration, 88(2), 528–550.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2012). Child Maltreatment 2011. Available from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment.
Valente, T. W., Chou, C. P., & Pentz, M. A. (2007). Community coalitions as a system: Effects of network change on adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 97(5), 880–886.
Valente, T. W., Coronges, K. A., Stevens, G. D., & Cousineau, M. R. (2008). Collaboration and competition in a children’s health initiative coalition: A network analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(4), 392–402.
Weiss, E. S., Taber, S. K., Breslau, E. S., Lillie, S. E., & Li, Y. (2010). The role of leadership and management in six southern public health partnerships: A study of member involvement and satisfaction. Health Education & Behavior, 37(5), 737–752.
Wolff, T. (2001). Community coalition building—contemporary practice and research: Introduction. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 165–172.
Zakocs, R. C., & Guckenburg, S. (2007). What coalition factors foster community capacity? Lessons learned from the fighting back initiative. Health Education & Behavior, 34(2), 354–375.
Acknowledgments
This study included data collected by SMS Research, and was conducted with the cooperation and partnership of the Hawai’i Children’s Trust Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardazone, G., U. Sy, A., Chik, I. et al. Mapping One Strong ‘Ohana: Using Network Analysis and GIS to Enhance the Effectiveness of a Statewide Coalition to Prevent Child Abuse and Neglect. Am J Community Psychol 53, 346–356 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9641-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9641-7