Albee, G. W. (1996). Revolutions and counterrevolutions in prevention. American Psychologist,
Anderson, K. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family,
Anderson, K. L. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles,
Berns, N. (2001). Degendering the problem and gendering the blame: Political discourse on women and violence. Gender and Society, 15
Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11–26). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, R., Baker, C. K., & Mazurek, T. L. (1998). Remaining radical? Organizational predictors of rape crisis centers’ social change initiatives. American Journal of Community Psychology,
Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. (1973). On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist,
Cowen, E. (1996). The ontogenesis of primary prevention: Lengthy strides and stubbed toes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24
Davis, L. V. (1987). Battered women: The transformation of a social problem. Social Work, 32, 306–311.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge.
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems,
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Building theories from case study research. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 5–35). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Fine, G. A. (1995). Public narration and group culture: Discerning discourse in social movements. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 127–143). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Fried, A. (1994). “It’s hard to change what we want to change”: Rape crisis centers as organizations. Gender and Society,
Gamson, W. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53–76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
Godino, V. J. (1992). Accommodation strategies and the cultural transformation of a social movement: A case study of two shelters for battered women. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(07), 2739. (UMI No. AAT 9400026).
Hammons, S. A. (2004). “Family violence”: The language of legitimacy. Affilia,
Hill, B. (2005). Social change to end violence against women (or to reclaim women’s sovereignty). Domestic violence awareness: Action for social change (pp. 11–16). Harrisburg, PA: Domestic Violence Awareness Project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence.
Hilton, N. Z. (1988). One in ten: The struggle and disempowerment of the battered women’s movement. Canadian Journal of Family Law,
Humphreys, K., & Rappaport, J. (1993). From the community mental health movement to the war on drugs: A study in the definition of social problems. American Psychologist,
Johnson, H. (1995). A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schemata. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 217–246). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Kimmel, M. S. (1994). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women,
Klandermans, B. (1995). The social construction of protest and multiorganizational fields. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 77–103). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lehrner, A. & Allen, N. E. (forthcoming). Still a movement after all these years? Current tensions in the domestic violence movement. Violence Against Women.
Mankowski, E. S., Haaken, J., & Silvergleid, C. S. (2002). Collateral damage: An analysis of the achievements and unintended consequences of batterer intervention programs and discourse. Journal of Family Violence,
Martin, P. Y. (1990). Rethinking feminist organizations. Gender and Society,
McDonald, J. (2005). Neo-liberalism and the pathologising of public issues: The displacement of feminist service models in domestic violence support services. Australian Social Work,
Mueller, C. M. (1992). Building social movement theory. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 3–26). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Pence, E. L. (1999). Some thoughts on philosophy. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 25–40). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Poore, G., & Dabby-Chinoy, F. C. (2005). Gender violence and patriarchy. Domestic violence awareness: Action for social change (pp. 1–9). Harrisburg, PA: Domestic Violence Awareness Project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence.
Rappaport, J. (2000). Community narratives: Tales of terror and joy. American Journal of Community Psychology,
Reinelt, C. (1994). Fostering empowerment, building community: The challenge for state-funded feminist organizations. Human Relations,
Renzetti, C. M. (1994). On dancing with a bear: Reflections on some of the current debates among domestic violence theorists. Violence and Victims,
Richie, B. (2000). A black feminist reflection on the anti-violence movement. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,
Riger, S. (1984). Vehicles for empowerment: The case of feminist movement organizations. Prevention in Human Services,
Riger, S. (1994). Challenges of success: stages of growth in feminist organizations. Feminist Studies,
Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the Victim. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Sarason, S. B. (1978). The nature of social problem solving in social action. American Psychologist,
Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? Violence Against Women,
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Shepard, M. F., & Pence, E. L. (1999). Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sullivan, C. M. (2006). Mission-focused management and empowerment practice: A handbook for executive directors of domestic violence programs. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
Taylor, V., & Whittier, N. (1995). Analytical approaches to social movement culture: The culture of the women’s movement. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 163–187). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Tierney, K. J. (1982). The battered women movement and the creation of the wife beating problem. Social Problems,
Walker, G. A. (1990). Family violence and the women’s movement: The conceptual politics of struggle. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Wharton, C. S. (1987). Establishing shelters for battered women: Local manifestations of a social movement. Qualitative Sociology,