de Zoysa I, Sweat MD, Denison JA. Faithful but fearful: reducing HIV transmission in stable relationships. AIDS 1995; 10 Suppl A:S197–S203.
Heise LL, Elias C. Prevention to meet women’s needs. A focus on developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(7):931–43.PubMedCrossRef
McKenna SL, Muyinda GK, Roth D, et al. Rapid HIV testing and counseling for voluntary testing centers in Africa. AIDS. 1997;11(Suppl 1):S103–10.PubMed
Gallo MF, Behets FM, Steiner MJ, et al. Prostate-specific antigen to ascertain reliability of self-reported coital exposure to semen. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:476–9.PubMedCrossRef
Mensch BS, Hewett PC, Gregory R, Helleringer S. Sexual behavior and STI/HIV status among adolescents in rural Malawi: an evaluation of the effect of interview mode on reporting. Stud Fam Plan. 2008;39(4):321–34.CrossRef
Minnis AM, Steiner M, Gallo M, et al. Biomarker validation of reports of recent sexual activity: results of a randomized controlled study in Zimbabwe. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:918–24.PubMedCrossRef
Eggleston E, Leitch J, Jackson J. Consistency of self-reports of sexual activity among young adolescents in Jamaica. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2000;26(2):79–83.CrossRef
Curtis SL, Sutherland EG. Measuring sexual behaviour in the era of HIV/AIDS: the experience of demographic and health surveys and similar enquiries. Sex Transm Infect. 2004; 80 Suppl II:ii22–ii27.
Bignami-Van Assche S. Are we measuring what we want to measure? Individual consistency in survey response in rural Malawi. Demogr Res. 2003;S1(3):77–108.CrossRef
Palen L, Smith E, Caldwell L, Flisher A, Wegner L, Vergnani T. Inconsistent reports of sexual intercourse among South African high school students. J Adolesc Health. 2009;42:221–7.CrossRef
Nnko S, Boerma JT, Urassa M, Mwaluko G, Zaba B. Secretive females or swaggering males? An assessment of the quality of sexual partnership reporting in rural Tanzania. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(2):299–310.PubMedCrossRef
Luke N, Clark S, Zulu EM. The relationship history calendar: improving the scope and quality of data on youth sexual behavior. Demography. 2011;48(3):1151–76.PubMedCrossRef
Langhaug LF, Cheung YB, Pascoe S, Chirawu P, Woelk G, Hayes R, Cowan FM. How you ask really matters: randomised comparison of four sexual behaviour questionnaire delivery modes in Zimbabwean youth. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87:165–73.PubMedCrossRef
Plummer ML, Ross DA, Wight D, et al. A bit more truthful: the validity of adolescent sexual behaviour data collected in rural northern Tanzania using five methods. Sex Transm Infect. 2004; 80 Suppl II:ii49–ii56.
Gregson S, Zhuwau T, Ndlovu J, Nyamukapa C. Methods to reduce social desirability bias in sex surveys in low-development settings. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(10):568–75.PubMedCrossRef
Johnson AM, Copas AJ, Erens B, et al. Effect of computer-assisted self interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviours in a general population sample: a methodological experiment. AIDS. 2001;15:111–5.PubMedCrossRef
Hewett PC, Mensch BS, de A Ribeiro M, Jones HE, Lippman S, Montgomery M, van de Wijgert J. Using sexually transmitted infection biomarkers to validate reporting of sexual behavior within a randomized experimental evaluation of interviewing methods. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(2):202–11.PubMedCrossRef
Mensch BS, Hewett PC, Erulkar AS. The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents: a methodological experiment in Kenya. Demography. 2003;40(2):247–68.PubMedCrossRef
Potdar R, Koenig M. Does audio-CASI improve reports of risky behavior? Evidence from a randomized field trial among young urban men in India. Stud Fam Plan. 2005;36(2):107–16.CrossRef
Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280:867–77.PubMedCrossRef
Phillips A, Gomez GB, Boily MC, Garnett G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative interviewing tools to investigate self-reported HIV and STI associated behaviours in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(6):1541–55.PubMedCrossRef
Jaccard J, McDonald R, Wan CK, Dittus PJ, Quinlan S. The accuracy of self-reports of condom use and sexual behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32:1863–905.CrossRef
Nyitray AG, Kim J, Hsu CH, et al. Test-retest reliability of a sexual behavior interview for men residing in Brazil, Mexico, and the United States: the HPV in men (HIM) study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:965–74.PubMedCrossRef
Vanable PA, Carey MP, Brown JL, et al. Test-retest reliability of self-reported HIV/STD-related measures among African-American adolescents in four U.S. cities. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44(3):214–21.PubMedCrossRef
Carey MP, Carey KB, Maisto SA, Gordon CM, Weinhardt LS. Assessing sexual risk behaviour with the timeline followback (TLFB) approach: continued development and psychometric evaluation with psychiatric outpatients. Int J STD AIDS. 2001;12:365–75.PubMedCrossRef
Needle R, Fisher DG, Weatherby N, Chitwood D, Brown B, Cesari H, et al. Reliability of self-reported HIV risk behaviors of drug users. Psychol Addict Behav. 1995;9:242–50.CrossRef
McElrath K, Chitwood DD, Griffin DK, Comerford M. The consistency of self-reported HIV risk behavior among injection drug users. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1965–70.PubMedCrossRef
Wringe A, Cremin I, McGrath N, et al. Comparative assessment of the quality of age-at-event reporting in three HIV cohort studies in sub-Saharan Africa. Sex Transm Infect. 2009; 85 Suppl 1:i56–i63.
Clark S, Kabiru C, Zulu E. Do men and women report their sexual partnerships differently? Evidence from Kisumu, Kenya. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;37(4):181–90.PubMedCrossRef
Helleringer S, Kohler HP, Kalilani-Phiri L, Mkandawire J, Armbruster B. The reliability of sexual partnership histories: implications for the measurement of partnership concurrency during surveys. AIDS. 2011;25:503–11.PubMedCrossRef
Lurie MN, Rosenthal S. Concurrent partnerships as a driver of the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa? The evidence is limited. AIDS Behav. 2010;14:17–24.PubMedCrossRef
UNAIDS Reference Group on Estimates Modelling and Projections. Working Group on measuring concurrent sexual partnerships. Consultation on concurrent sexual partnerships: recommendations from a meeting of the UNAIDS Reference Group on estimates, Modelling and Projections held in Nairobi, Kenya, 20–21 April 2009.
Glynn JR, Kayuni N, Banda E, Parrott F, Floyd S, Francis-Chizororo M, et al. Assessing the validity of sexual behavior reports in a whole population survey in rural Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7):e22840.PubMedCrossRef
Maughan-Brown B, Venkataramani AS. Measuring concurrent partnerships: potential for underestimation in UNAIDS recommended method. AIDS. 2011;25:1549–51.PubMedCrossRef
Mensch B, Soler-Hampejsek E, Kelly C, Hewett P, Grant M. Transitions to adulthood in rural Malawi: estimating the sequencing of sexual initiation, school leaving, and marriage. Paper presented at annual meeting of the population association of America, Washington DC, 1 April 2011.
Nelson SJ, Manhart LE, Gorbach PM, Martin DH, Stoner BP, Aral SO, Holmes KK. Measuring sex partner concurrency: it’s what’s missing that counts. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:801–7.PubMed
Fisher M, Kupferman LB, Lesser M. Substance use in a school-based clinic population: use of the randomised response technique to estimate prevalence. J Adolesc Health. 1992;13:281–5.PubMedCrossRef
Ostapczuk M, Musch J, Moshagen M. A randomized-response investigation of the education effect in attitudes towards foreigners. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2009;39:920–31.CrossRef
Ostapczuk M, Moshagen M, Zhao Z, Musch J. Assessing sensitive attributes using the randomized response technique: evidence for the importance of response symmetry. J Educ Behav Stat. 2009;34(2):267–87.CrossRef
Scheers NJ, Mitchell DC. Improved estimation of academic cheating behaviour using the randomized response technique. Res High Educ. 1987;26(1):61–9.CrossRef
Weissman AN, Steer RA, Lipton DS. Estimating illicit drug use through telephone interviews and the randomised response technique. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1986;18:225–33.PubMedCrossRef
Lensvelt-Mulders G, Joop J, van der Heijden P, Maas C. Meta-analysis of randomized response research: Thirty-five years of validation. Sociological Methods Res. 2005;33:319–45.CrossRef
McBurney P. On transferring statistical techniques across cultures: the kish grid. Curr Anthropol. 1988;29(2):323–5.CrossRef
Haneman U. Literacy in Botswana. UNESCO Institute for Education. Paper commissioned for the EFA global monitoring report 2006, Literacy for Life, UNESCO Institute for Education (UIE), Hamburg, Germany.
Boruch RF. Assuring confidentiality of responses in social research: a note on strategies. Am Sociol. 1971;6(4):308–11.
Warner S. Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Am Stat Assoc. 1965;60(309):63–9.PubMedCrossRef
Fox JA, Tracy PR. Randomized response: a method for sensitive surveys. London: Sage Publications; 1986.
Lensvelt-Mulders G, Hox JJ, van der Heijden PG. How to improve the efficiency of randomised response designs. Qual Quant. 2005;39:253–65.CrossRef
Fowler FJ, Mangione TW. Standardized survey interviewing: minimizing interviewer-related error. California: Sage Publications; 1990.
Lagarde E, Enel C, Pison G. Reliability of reports of sexual behavior: a study of married couples in rural West Africa. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141(12):1194–200.PubMed
Biraro S, Shafer LA, Kleinschmidt I, et al. Is sexual risk taking behaviour changing in rural south-west Uganda? Behaviour trends in a rural population cohort. Sex Transm Infect. 2009; 85 Suppl 1:i3–i11.
Wellings K, Collumbien M, Slaymaker E, et al. Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective. Lancet. 2006;368:1706–28.PubMedCrossRef
Glynn JR, Dube A, Kayuni N, Floyd S, Molesworth A, Parrott F, French N, Crampin A. Measuring concurrency: an empirical study of different methods in a large population-based survey in northern Malawi and evaluation of the UNAIDS guidelines. AIDS 2012; post acceptance, 9 January 2012.
Boeije H, Gerty JL, Lensvelt-Mulders M. Honest by chance: a qualitative interview study to clarify respondents’ (non-)compliance with computer-assisted randomized response. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique. 2002;75:24–39.CrossRef
Coutts S, Jann B. Sensitive questions in online surveys: experimental results from a randomized response technique and unmatched count technique. Soc Methods Res. 2011;40(1):169–93.CrossRef
van der Heijden P, Ger van Gils G. Some logistic regression models for randomized response data. In: Forcina A, Marchetti GM, Hatzinger R, Galmatti G, editors. Statistical modelling: proceedings of the 11th international workshop on statistical modelling. Orvieto: Graphos; 1996.