Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Governance in the age of global markets: challenges, limits, and consequences

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Unable to provide a concept of community higher than shared material gain or a concept of morality higher than adherence to procedural rules, [neo]liberalism has turned western and, increasingly, world society back toward not merely the state of nature which Locke postulated, but the state of war of each against all which haunted Hobbes. The myth of the beginning is converted into the reality of the end.

– (Ferkiss 1974, p. 155).

Abstract

We live in an age defined in large part by various facets of neoliberalism. In particular, the market world has impinged on virtually every aspect of food and agriculture. Moreover, most nation-states and many international governance bodies incorporate aspects of neoliberal perspectives. Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs), with their own standards, certifications, and accreditations are evidence of both the continuing hegemony of neoliberalism as well as various responses to it. Importantly, to date even attempts to limit neoliberal hegemony through MSIs have been largely within the parameters established by those same neoliberal agendas. However, neoliberalism is itself in crisis as a result of climate change, the continuing financial crisis, and rising food prices. The founding myths of neoliberalism are still widely held, having the effect of closing off alternative paths to the future. Yet, this need not be the case. Alternatives to the current MSIs that promote justice, democracy, and equality can still be constructed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One might also argue that they adopt parts of the industrial world (e.g., Boltanski and Thévenot 1991; Raynolds this issue). However, they do so largely to the extent that it supports marketization.

  2. Ludwig von Mises (1978 [1933], p. 13), Hayek’s mentor, explained it thusly: “The science of human action that strives for universally valid knowledge is the theoretical system whose hitherto best elaborated branch is economics. In all of its branches this science is a priori, not empirical. Like logic and mathematics, it is not derived from experience; it is prior to experience. It is, as it were, the logic of action and deed.”

  3. Montesquieu (1914 [1752]) developed the modern notion that representative democracies can only be considered democratic to the extent that the executive, legislative and judicial functions remain separate.

  4. As explained by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 2012): “Conformity assessment is the process used to show that a product, service or system meets specified requirements.”

  5. In a recent article, Rahman (2012) proposes a solution to the problem drawing on the principles of game theory. Essentially, the idea is to provide incentives to those who monitor the behavior of others such as to encourage them to do their jobs. Whether this might work in practice remains to be seen. It seems unlikely given that there are many layers of audits, each of which imposes requirements on other actors, as well as competitions among auditors trying to capture various markets for auditing.

  6. The neoliberal conception of ‘rule of law’ emphasizes the formal equality of all under the law, ignoring the actual inequalities that might be remedied or ameliorated with civic action. See, for example, Hayek (2007 [1944]).

  7. This is not to suggest that States always enforce the law adequately; in many instances corruption and laxity limit State protections. However, in democratic nations, such issues are at least addressable by the populace.

  8. For alternative approaches see, e.g., Dietz and O’Neill (2013) and Jackson (2009).

Abbreviations

ESOP:

Employee Stockholder Ownership Plan

MSI:

Multi-stakeholder initiative

NGO:

Non-governmental organization

RSPO:

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

RTRS:

Roundtable on Responsible Soy

SQF:

Safe Quality Food

WIETA:

Agricultural Ethical Trade Initiative

WTO:

World Trade Organization

References

  • Ayres, C.E. 1957. Discussion. The American Economic Review 47(2): 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, C. 2010. Structuring the flexible and feminized labor market: Global GAP standards for agricultural labor in Chile. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 35(2): 343–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B.R. 1984. Strong democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bark, W.C. 1958. Origins of the medieval world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. 2007. Collateral casualties of consumerism. Journal of Consumer Culture 7(1): 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity (trans: Ritter, M.). London: Sage.

  • Becker, G., and G. Becker. 1997. The economics of life: From baseball to affirmative action to immigration, how real-world issues affect our everyday life. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. 1993. Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy 101(3): 385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockman, J., and G. Eyal. 2002. Eastern Europe as a laboratory for economic knowledge: The transnational roots of neoliberalism. American Journal of Sociology 108(2): 310–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 2006 [1991]. On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Bourdieu, P. 1998. The essence of neoliberalism, Le Monde Diplomatique. http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/08bourdieu. Accessed 4 Nov 2007.

  • Boyer, R. 1997. The variety and unequal performance of really existing markets: Farewell to doctor pangloss? In Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions, ed. J.R. Hollingsworth, and R. Boyer, 55–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • British Broadcasting Company. 2007. UK to tackle bogus carbon schemes. http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/newsid_3950000/newsid_3955200/3955223.stm. Accessed 18 Jan 2007.

  • Brown, S., and C. Getz. 2008. Privatizing farm worker justice: Regulating labor through voluntary certification and labeling. Geoforum 39: 1184–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, D., and G. Lawrence. 2009. Towards a third food regime: Behind the transformation. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 267–279.

  • Busch, L. 2011. Standards: Recipes for reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., P. Lascoumbes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambrosio, A., P. Keating, T. Schlich, and G. Weisz. 2009. Biomedical conventions and regulatory objectivity: A few introductory remarks. Social Studies of Science 39(5): 651–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre International d’Etudes Pour la Rénovation du Libéralisme. 1939. Le Colloque Walter Lippmann. Paris: Librairie de Médicis, Cahier no. 1.

  • Daviron, B., and S. Ponte. 2005. The coffee paradox: Global markets, commodity trade and the elusive promise of development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, R., and D. O’Neill. 2013. Enough is enough: Building a sustainable economy in a world of finite resources. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, B. 2007. Another inconvenient truth. BusinessWeek 4027: 96–98, 100, 102.

  • Elias, N. 1994 [1939]. The civilizing process (trans: Jephcott, E.). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Ferkiss, V. 1974. The future of technological civilization. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2008. The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 2002 [1962]. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Gereffi, G., R. Garcia-Johnson, and E. Sasser. 2001. The NGO-industrial complex. Foreign Relations 125: 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2006. A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, L. 1997. Power lines: The political context of nongovernmental organization (NGO) activity in El Alto, bolivia. Journal of Latin American Anthropology 2(2): 144–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.A. 2011. Neoliberalism and the death of the social state: Remembering Walter Benjamin’s angel of history. Social Identities 17(4): 587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GlobalGAP. 2013. GlobalGAP. http://www.globalgap.org/uk_en/. Accessed 9 May 2013.

  • Green, H. 2008. How Green is that gizmo? BusinessWeek 4065: 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, H., and K. Capell. 2008. Carbon confusion. BusinessWeek 4075: 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. 2008. Thinking inside the neoliberal box: The micro-politics of agro-food philanthropy. Geoforum 39: 1241–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. 1990. When does worker ownership work? ESOPs, law firms, codetermination, and economic democracy. The Yale Law Journal 99(8): 1749–1816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka, M. 2010. Certification, partnership, and morality in an organic shrimp network: Rethinking transnational alternative agrifood networks. World Development 38(5): 706–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1973–1979. Law, legislation and liberty, vol 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Hayek, F. A. 2007 [1944]. The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Head, S. 2011. The grim threat to British universities. New York Review of Books 58. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jan/13/grim-threat-british-universities/?pagination=false. Accessed 10 Feb 2012.

  • Higgins, W., and K. Tamm Hallström. 2007. Standardization, globalization and rationalities of government. Organization 14(5): 685–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D., T. Reid, and L. Busch. 2007. Les Normes dans l’Agriculture Contemporaine: Du Droit Positif à ‘l’Etat Evaluateur et Auditeur’. Demeter 13: 89–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. 1954. The waning of the middle ages. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ISEAL Alliance. 2013. ISEAL Alliance. http://www.isealalliance.org/. Accessed 9 May 2013.

  • ISO. 2012. What is conformity assessment? http://www.iso.org/iso/home/about/conformity-assessment.htm. Accessed 8 Nov 2012.

  • Jackson, T. 2009. Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Oxon: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamat, S. 2004. The privatization of public interest: Theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era. Review of International Political Economy 11(1): 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. 2007. The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P. 2007. Uncertain subjects of Anglo-American financialization. Cultural Critique 65(Winter): 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. 2009. Neoliberalism in action: Inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory, Culture & Society 26(6): 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, C. 2012. If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry 38(3): 599–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1969 [1845]. Theses on Feuerbach. In Marx/Engels selected works, vol 1, 13–15. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

  • Mirowski, P., and D. Plehwe. 2009. The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont Pelerin Society. 2006. The Mont Pelerin Society. http://www.montpelerin.org/. Accessed 18 Mar 2009.

  • Montesquieu, C. d. S. B. d. 1914 [1752]. The spirit of laws. London: G. Bell & Sons, Ltd.

  • Nelson, V.J., A. Tallontire, M. Opondo, and A. Martin. 2013. Narrative framings and power dynamics in private standards and global agri-food chains. In Food transgressions: Making sense of contemporary food politics, ed. M. Goodman, and C. Sage. Farnham: Ashgate. (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. 2002. A question of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam America. 2013. Behind the brands. http://www.behindthebrands.org/en-us. Accessed 12 May 2013.

  • Rahman, D. 2012. But who will monitor the monitor? American Economic Review 102(6): 2767–2797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L.T. 2009. Mainstreaming fair trade coffee: From partnership to traceability. World Development 37(6): 1083–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revault d’Allonnes, M. 2010. Pourquoi nous n’aimons pas la démocratie. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, L.A., and S. Ponte. 2011. Brand aid: Shopping well to save the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 1996. Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. 1993. Poland’s jump to the market economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclove, R.E. 1995. Democracy and technology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., and M. Max-Neef. 2011. Economics unmasked. Devon: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. 2000. New accountabilities: Anthropological studies in audit, ethics, and the academy. In Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy, ed. M. Strathern, 1–18. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tallontire, A., and V. Nelson. 2013. Fair trade narratives and political dynamics. Social Enterprise Journal 9(1): 28–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallontire, A., V. Nelson, M. Opondo, and A. Martin. 2010. Politics of private standards: Briefing 1. Output from research project: The governance implications of private standards initiatives in agri-food chains. Leeds: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, M. 2007. The new bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, L. 1978 [1933]. Epistemological problems of economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

  • Wacquant, L. 2012. Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neoliberalism. Social Anthropology 20(1): 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzlau, S. 2013. Global food prices continue to rise. http://www.worldwatch.org/global-food-prices-continue-rise-0. Accessed 11 Apr 2013.

  • Williamson, J. 2004–2005. The strange history of the Washington consensus. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 27(2):195–206.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Emmanuelle Cheyns, Michiel Köhne, Lone Riisgaard and Anne Tallontire for their insightful and helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Lawrence Busch

Authors
  1. Lawrence Busch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Busch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Busch, L. Governance in the age of global markets: challenges, limits, and consequences. Agric Hum Values 31, 513–523 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9510-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9510-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation