Abstract
I examine the risks and opportunities associated with social movement coalition building in attempts to block or curtail the rise of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in the United States. As producers have scaled up animal production facilities, environmentalists and animal rights activists, along with numerous other social actors, have begun anti-CAFO campaigns. I argue that while the CAFO has mobilized a diverse group of social actors, these individuals and organizations do not all have the same interests (aside from resistance to CAFOs), leading to some unlikely allies. These odd alliances provide opportunities for agrifood scholars to study the relationship between the coalitions that social movement organizations form and the support they receive from their respective constituencies. Lastly, I argue that the need for agrifood scholars to address the pitfalls associated with single-issue coalition building extends beyond the unlikely alliance between environmentalists and animal rights activists, as agrifood related crises have led to a proliferation of such coalitions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AWI. 2007. AWI’s animal welfare approved standards program. AWI Online Publication. http://www.awionline.org/farm/fivefreedoms.htm. Accessed 19 September 2007.
Burmeister, L. 2002. Lagoons, litter and the law: CAFO regulation as social risk. Southern Rural Sociology 18 (2): 56–87.
Buttel, F. 2003. Internalizing the societal costs of agricultural production. Plant Physiology 133 (4): 1656–1665.
Constance, D., and A. Bonnano. 1999. CAFO controversy in the Texas panhandle region: The environmental crisis of hog production. Culture and Agriculture 21 (1): 14–26.
Croteau, D., and L. Hicks. 2003. Coalition framing and the challenge of a consonant frame pyramid: The case of a collaborative response to homelessness. Social Problems 50 (2): 251–272.
Jamison, W., and W. Lunch. 1992. Rights of animals, perceptions of science, and political activism: Profile of American animal rights activists. Science, Technology & Human Values 17 (4): 438–458.
Juska, A., and B. Edwards. 2004. Refusing the Trojan pig: The trans-Atlantic coalition against corporate pork production in Poland. In Coalitions across borders: Transnational protest and the neo-liberal order, ed. J. Brandy and J. Smith, 187–207. Lanham, MD: Rowland & Littlefield.
Koc, M., and K. Dahlberg. 1999. Restructuring of food systems: Trends, research and policy issues. Agriculture and Human Values 16 (2): 109–116.
Magnan, A. 2007. Strange bedfellows: Contentious coalitions and the politics of GM wheat. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 44 (3): 289–318.
Perrow, C. 1999. Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holt, D.M. Unlikely allies against factory farms: animal rights advocates and environmentalists. Agric Hum Values 25, 169–171 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9122-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9122-4