Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What we call what we do affects how we do it: a new nomenclature for simulation research in medical education

  • Reflections
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid technological advances and concern for patient safety have increased the focus on simulation as a pedagogical tool for educating health care providers. To date, simulation research scholarship has focused on two areas; evaluating instructional designs of simulation programs, and the integration of simulation into a broader educational context. However, these two categories of research currently exist under a single label—Simulation-Based Medical Education. In this paper we argue that introducing a more refined nomenclature within which to frame simulation research is necessary for researchers, to appropriately design research studies and describe their findings, and for end-point users (such as program directors and educators), to more appropriately understand and utilize this evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bligh, J., & Bleakley, A. (2006). Distributing menus to hungry learners: Can learning by simulation become simulation of learning? Medical Teacher, 28(7), 606–613. doi:10.1080/01421590601042335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A. (2010). One drop at a time: Research to advance the science of simulation. Simulation in Healthcare, 5(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A., Bordage, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Medical Education, 42(2), 128–133. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02974.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A., Hamstra, S. J., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., et al. (2013). Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Teacher, 35(1), e844–e875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., et al. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, 306(9), 978–988. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieckmann, P., Phero, J. C., Issenberg, S. B., Kardong-Edgren, S., Østergaard, D., & Ringsted, C. (2011). The first research consensus summit of the society for simulation in healthcare. Simulation in Healthcare, 6(7), S1–S9. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822238fc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubrowski, A. (2005). Performance versus learning curves: What is motor learning and how is it measured? Surgical Endoscopy, 19(9), 1290. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-8261-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forscher, B. K. (1963). Chaos in the brickyard [Letter to the Editor]. Science, 142, 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaba, D. M. (2011). Training and nontechnical skills: The politics of terminology. Simulation in Healthcare, 6, 8–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavin, R. J. (2011). Skills, training, and education. Simulation in Healthcare, 6, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haji, F., Morin, M. P., Parker, K. (2013). Re-thinking program evaluation in health professions education: beyond ‘did it work’? Medical Education, 47, 342–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issenberg, S. B. (2006). The scope of simulation-based health care education. Simulation in Healthcare, 1(4), 203–208. doi:10.1097/01.SIH.0000246607.36504.5a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issenberg, S. B., Ringsted, C., Østergaard, D., & Dieckmann, P. (2011). Setting a research agenda for simulation-based healthcare education. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 6(3), 155–167. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182207c24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2006). Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Medical Education, 40(8), 792. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02528.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Medical Education, 44(1), 50–63. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the Elusive ADDIE Model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestel, D., Walker, K., Simon, R., Aggarwal, R., & Andreatta, P. (2011). Nontechnical skills: An inaccurate and unhelpful descriptor? Simulation in Healthcare, 6, 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick, R. K., & MacRae, H. (2006). Teaching surgical skills–changes in the wind. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355(25), 2664–2669. doi:10.1056/NEJMra054785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerbo, M. W., Murray, W. B., Alinier, G., et al. (2011). A path to better healthcare simulation systems: Leveraging the integrated systems design approach. Simulation in Healthcare, 6, S20–S23. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e318227cf41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinger, M. B. (2010). The pharmacology of simulation: A conceptual framework to inform progress in simulation research. Simulation in Healthcare, 5(1), 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, A., Wolpe, P. R., Small, S. D., & Glick, S. (2003). Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Academic Medicine, 78(8), 783–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is the result of a collaborative effort from the members of the LIFE Research Group. All authors contributed equally to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey J. H. Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haji, F.A., Hoppe, D.J., Morin, MP. et al. What we call what we do affects how we do it: a new nomenclature for simulation research in medical education. Adv in Health Sci Educ 19, 273–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9452-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9452-x

Keywords

Navigation