Increased authenticity in practical assessment using emergency case OSCE stations
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In case of an emergency, a fast and structured patient management is crucial for patient’s outcome. The competencies needed should be acquired and assessed during medical education. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a valid and reliable assessment format to evaluate practical skills. However, traditional OSCE stations examine isolated skills or components of a clinical algorithm and thereby lack a valid representation of clinical reality. We developed emergency case OSCE stations (ECOS), where students have to manage complete emergency situations from initial assessment to medical treatment and consideration of further procedures. Our aim was to increase the authenticity and validity in the assessment of students’ capability to cope with emergency patients. 45 students participated in a 10-station OSCE with 6 ECOS and 4 traditional OSCE stations. They were assessed using a case-specific checklist. An inter-station and post-OSCE-questionnaire was completed by each student to evaluate both ECOS and traditional OSCE. In this study, we were able to demonstrate that ECOS are feasible as time-limited OSCE stations. There was a high acceptance on both students and examiners side. They rated ECOS to be more realistic in comparison to the traditional OSCE scenarios. The reliability estimated via Crohnbach’s α for the 6 ECOS is high (0.793). ECOS offer a feasible alternative to the traditional OSCE stations with adequate reliability to assess students’ capabilities to cope with an acute emergency in a realistic encounter.
- Barman, A. (2005). Critiques on the objective structured clinical examination. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 34, 478–482.
- Battles, J. B., Wilkinson, S. L., & Lee, S. J. (2004). Using standardised patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13, 46–50. CrossRef
- Boursicot, K., & Roberts, T. (2005). How to set up an OSCE. The Clinical Teacher, 2, 16–20. CrossRef
- Burdick, W. P., Jouriles, N. J., D’Onofrio, G., Kass, L. E., Mahoney, J. F., & Restifo, K. M. (1998). Emergency medicine in undergraduate education. SAEM Education Commitee, Undergraduate Subcommittee, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine, 5, 1105–1110. CrossRef
- Crossley, J., Humphris, G., & Jolly, B. (2002). Assessing health professionals. Medical Education, 36, 800–804. CrossRef
- Downing, S. M. (2004). Reliability: On the reproducibility of assessment data. Medical Education, 38, 1006–1012. CrossRef
- Farrell, S. (2009). Evaluation of student performance: Clinical and professional performance. SAEM medical student educators’ handbook. Retrieved February 22, 2009, from http://www.saem.org/download/hand-4.pdf.
- Frankfurt Institute of Emergency Medicine and Simulation Training. (2009). Retrieved June 2, 2009, from www.finest-online.org.
- Harden, R. M., & Gleeson, F. A. (1979). Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Medical Education, 13, 41–54.
- Harden, R. M., Stevenson, M., Downie, W. W., & Wilson, G. M. (1975). Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. British Medical Journal, 1, 447–451. CrossRef
- Hodges, B. (2003a). Validity and the OSCE. Medical Teacher, 25, 250–254. CrossRef
- Hodges, B. (2003b). OSCE! Variations on a theme by Harden. Medical Education, 37, 1134–1140. CrossRef
- Hodges, B., Hanson, M., McNaughton, N., & Regehr, G. (2002). Creating, monitoring, and improving a psychiatry OSCE: A guide for faculty. Academic Psychiatry, 26, 134–161. CrossRef
- Hodges, B., Regehr, G., Hanson, M., & McNaughton, N. (1998). Validation of an objective structured clinical examination in psychiatry. Academic Medicine, 73, 910–912. CrossRef
- Johnson, G., & Reynard, K. (1994). Assessment of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for undergraduate students in accident and emergency medicine. Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine, 11, 223–226.
- Lunenfeld, E., Weinreb, B., Lavi, Y., Amiel, G. E., & Friedman, M. (1991). Assessment of emergency medicine: A comparison of an experimental objective structured clinical examination with a practical examination. Medical Education, 25, 38–44. CrossRef
- Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 65(Suppl. 9), 63–67.
- Newble, D. (2004). Techniques for measuring clinical competence: Objective structured clinical examinations. Medical Education, 38, 199–203. CrossRef
- Selby, C., Osman, L., Davis, M., & Lee, M. (1995). Set up and run an objective structured clinical exam. BMJ, 310, 1187–1190.
- Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. (2003a). Reliability. In D. L. Streiner & G. Norman (Eds.), Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (pp. 126–152). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. (2003b). Selecting the items. In D. L. Streiner & G. Norman (Eds.), Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (pp. 61–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The checklists development checklist. Western Michigan University Evaluation Center. Retrieved February 22, 2009, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cdc.htm.
- van der Vleuten, C. (1996). The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1, 41–67. CrossRef
- van der Vleuten, C. (2000). Validity of final examinations in undergraduate medical training. BMJ, 321, 1217–1219. CrossRef
- van der Vleuten, C. P., & Schuwirth, L. W. (2005). Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Medical Education, 39, 309–317. CrossRef
- van der Vleuten, C., & Swanson, D. (1990). Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: State of the art. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2, 58–76. CrossRef
- Increased authenticity in practical assessment using emergency case OSCE stations
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Volume 15, Issue 1 , pp 81-95
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Clinical skills
- Emergency medicine
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Trauma Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- 2. Med Con Team, CEO, Reutlingen, Germany
- 3. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
- 4. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus Technical University, Dresden, Germany
- 5. Medical Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany