Abstract
In the context of health sciences education, and education in general, the knowledge or ability of one or several subjects in a specific area is frequently compared using different forms of a test, or by means of different instruments aimed at measuring this knowledge or ability. In such cases, test scores must be equated so that they can be properly compared. The present article aims to explain the equating of scores within the framework of item response theory (IRT), special emphasis being placed on its application in the field of health sciences education. Although there are many data collection designs that can be used within the framework of score equating, the three most widely used designs are single group, randomly equivalent groups and non-equivalent groups with anchor test. Likewise, there are different equating procedures within IRT, such as the mean/mean and mean/sigma methods, or methods based on the characteristic curve. The equating of scores must ensure that examinees taking a test do so under the same conditions; however, the procedure is also highly useful in creating a bank of items that can be used subsequently in new tests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angoff W.A. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In: Thorndike R.L. (ed) Educational Measurement. (2nd edition), Washington: American Council on Education. pp. 508–600
Brennan R.L., Kolen M.J. (1987). A reply to Angoff Applied Psychological Measurement 11: 301–306
Crocker L., Algina J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Downing S.M. (2003). Item response theory: Applications of modern test theory in medical education Medical Education 37: 739–745
Embretson S.E., Reise S.P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Haebara T. (1980). Equating logistic ability scales by a weighted least squares method Japanese Psychological Research 22: 144–149
Hambleton R.K., Swaminathan H., Rogers H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. California: Sage Publications
Kolen M.J., Brennan R.L. (1995). Test Equating: Methods and Practices. New York: Springer Verlag
Lord F.M. (1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Loyd B., Engelhard G., Crocker L. (1996). Achieving form-to-form comparability: Fundamental issues and proposed strategies for equating performance assessments for teachers Educational Assessment 3: 99–110
Loyd B.H., Hoover H.D. (1980). Vertical equating using the Rasch Model Journal of Educational Measurement 17: 179–193
Marco G.L. (1977). Item characteristic curve solutions to three intractable testing problems Journal of Educational Measurement 14:139–160
Stocking M.L., Lord F.M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory Applied Psychological Measurement 7:201–210
Acknowledgements
This study was partially supported by grants 2005FIR 00277 and 2005SGR00365 from the “Departament d’Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Informació de la Generalitat de Catalunya”, and SEJ2005-09144-C02-02 from Spain’s “Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología” under European Regional Development Found (ERDF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guilera*, G., Gómez, J. Item Response Theory Test Equating in Health Sciences Education. Adv in Health Sci Educ 13, 3–10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9020-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9020-8