Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Possibilities of diverse rubber based agroforestry systems for smallholdings in India

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rubber growers in South East Asian countries are facing acute crisis due to the price volatility, sharp increase in cost of cultivation, increasing drought and declining soil fertility. With an objective to generate additional income and improve small-holder welfare by integrating diverse crops in rubber ecosystem, three experiments were conducted in Rubber Research Institute of India during 2001–2014 period. In one experiment, coffee, vanilla on Glyricidia standards, Garcinia and nutmeg were cultivated along with rubber without altering the planting design and density of rubber trees. Growth of rubber was significantly higher under mixed planting and yield was not influenced. Soil moisture status during summer and microbial population were higher in mixed planting system and soil nutrient status was maintained. Yield of all the intercrops was good during initial years. As the shade from rubber canopy intensified, Garcinia perished but vanilla and coffee continued to yield reasonably well. In another experiment, nine shade tolerant medicinal plants were evaluated in mature rubber plantation. All the medicinal plants established well and produced reasonable biomass, but the performance of Strobilanthes cuspida and Alpinia calcarata were comparatively better. In another study, it was observed that short duration vegetables like amaranthus and salad cucumber can be cultivated during the annual leaf shedding period in mature rubber plantations to meet part of the household requirement. The results showed that diverse crops can be integrated with rubber without any adverse effect on growth and yield of rubber. Crop diversification generated additional income, mitigated drought and sustained soil fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dey SK, Choudhury M, Ray S, Nazeer MA (2007) Intercropping of tea in the immature stage of rubber in Tripura – A preliminary report. Indian J Hill Farm 20(1&2):32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • George S, Nair ANS (2012) Assessment of nutrient requirement in a rubber-based cropping system with coffee and cocoa as inter crops. In: Proceedings of the 24th Kerala Science Congress, Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam, 29–31 January 2012

  • George S, Lisha C, Nair ANS, Nair CU (2008) Competitive interactions in a rubber- based agro-eco-system with coffee and cocoa as intercrops. In: Abstract of papers. International Natural Rubber Conference, Kuala Lumpur,13–15 October 2008

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Inc, New York, p 498

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob J, George KT (2008) Ageing of mature area and declining yield profile of natural rubber in India. Natural Rubb Res 21:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessy MD, Joseph P, George, S (2015) Establishing perennial intercrops in rubber plantations after the removal of pineapple: Effect on growth and yield of rubber, soil moisture and nutrient status. Rubb Sci 28(2):138–146

  • Jessy MD, Philip V, Punnoose KI, Sethuraj MR (1998) Evaluation of a multispecies cropping system during immaturity phase of rubber. Indian J Natur Rubb Res 11(1&2):80–87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jessy MD, Punnose KI, Nayar TVR (2005) Crop diversification and its sustainability in young rubber plantation. J Plant Crops 33(1):29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessy MD, Prasannakumari P, Abraham J, Jacob J (2010) Mitigating the impact of climate uncertainties on rubber cultivation in traditional rubber growing regions of India. Paper presented in the IRRDB Conference, China

  • Jessy MD, Meti S, Nair UN (2013a) A cropping system for reduction of gestation period and enhanced yield of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis). Rubb Sci 26:210–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessy MD, Prasannakumari P, Abraham J (2013b) Carbon and nutrient recycling through fine roots in rubber plantations. Exp Agri 49(4):556–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph M (1999) Studies on some competing factors in the intercropping young rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). PhD thesis Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur. p 95

  • Kerala Agricultural University (1989) Package of practices recommendations. Directorate of Extension, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, p 253

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerala Agricultural University (2002) Package of practices recommendations. Directorate of Extension, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, p 278

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2004) The enigma of tropical home gardens. Agroforest Syst 61:135–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews AS (2014) NR Shock, What’s in store?. Rubber Asia, November-December, pp 34–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon PM (2002) Natural rubber in India: past, present and future. In: Jacob CK (ed) Global Competitiveness of Indian Rubber Plantation Industry. Rubber Planter’s Conference, Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottaym, pp 17–32

  • Morgan MF (1941) Chemical diagnosis by the universal soil testing system. Bull Connecticut Agric Experiment Station, p 450

  • Muschler RG, Bonnemann A (1997) Potentials and limitations of agroforestry for changing land-use in the tropics: experiences from Central America. For Ecol Manag 91:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oijen MV, Dauzat J, Lawson Harmand JM, G, Vaast P (2010) Coffee agroforestry systems in Central America: II. development of a simple process-based model and preliminary results. Agroforest Syst 80:361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partelli FL, Araujo AV, Vieira HD, Dias JRM, Menezes LFT, Ramalho JC (2014) Microclimate and development of ‘Conilon’ coffee intercropped with rubber trees. Pesq agropec bras, Brasilia 49:872–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathiratna LSS, Perera MKP (2006a) Effect of plant density on bark yield of cinnamon intercropped under mature rubber. Agroforest Syst 68:123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathiratna LSS, Perera MKP (2006b) Intercropping medicinal plants under rubber (Hevea). Bull Rubb Res Inst Sri Lanka 47:28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip A, Varghese M, Syamala VK, Joseph K, Jessy MD, Nair NU (2012) Integrating organic manure to reduce chemical fertilizer input and enhance growth in young rubber plantations. J Plant Crops 40(3):158–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper CS (1966) Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publishers, Bombay, p 368

    Google Scholar 

  • Righi CA, Campoe OC, Bernardes MS, Lunz AMP, Piedade SMS, Pereira CR (2013) Influence of rubber trees on leaf-miner damage to coffee plants in an agroforestry system. Agroforest Syst 87:1351–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivest D, Olivier Lorente MM, Messier C (2013) Soil biochemical properties and microbial resilience in agroforestry system: effects on wheat growth under controlled drought and flooding conditions. Sci Total Environ 1:463–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo VHL, Silva TUK, Munasinghe ES (2004) Improving the spatial arrangement of planting rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell, Arg.) for long-term intercropping. Field Crops Res 89:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seneviratne P, Perera MKP (2011) Cinnamon as an intercrop for rubber. Bull Rubb Res Institute of Sri Lanka 52:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S, Jacob J (2013) The Gadgil-Katurirangan reports on Western Ghats and concerns of the plantation sector. Rubb Sci 26:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Vimalakumari TG, Joseph K, Jessy MD, Kothandaraman R, Mathew J, Punnoose KI (2001) Influence of intercropping on the rhizosphere microlora of Hevea. Indian J Nat Rubb Res 14(1):55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel AI (1969) A text book of the qualitative inorganic analysis including elementary instrumental analysis. The English language book society and Longman, pp 744–745

  • Wibawa G, Joshi L, Noordwijk MV, Penot E (2006) Rubber based agroforestry systems (RAS) alternatives for rubber monoculture system. IRRDB : Annual Conference, Ho-chi-minh city, p 745

  • Xianhai Z, Mingdao C, Weifu L (2012) Improving planting pattern for intercropping in the whole production span of rubber tree. African J Biotechnol 11:84–8490

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. James Jacob, Director, Rubber Research Institute of India for his encouragement and Dr. K. I. Punnoose, former Deputy Director, Agronomy/Soils Division, Rubber Research Institute of India for his valuable support during the early part of the study. We also acknowledge the technical help of Dr. Gracy Mathew, Associate Professor, AMPRS, Kerala Agricultural University, Odakkali for cultivation of medicinal plants and the co-operation and support of the management and staff of Central Experiment Station, Rubber Research Institute of India, Chethackal and Mundakayam estate, Harrisons Malayalam Group of Plantations, Mundakayam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. D. Jessy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jessy, M.D., Joseph, P. & George, S. Possibilities of diverse rubber based agroforestry systems for smallholdings in India. Agroforest Syst 91, 515–526 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9953-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9953-8

Keywords

Navigation