Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wind speed reductions as influenced by woody hedgerows grown for biomass in short rotation alley cropping systems in Germany

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cultivation of fast growing trees on agricultural sites is an area undergoing a growth in interest due to the rising demand for woody biomass as a source of bioenergy. Short rotation alley cropping systems (SRACS) represent a promising possibility to combine annual crops for food, fodder or bioenergy with woody plants for biomass production, doing so through an integration of hedgerows of fast growing trees into conventional agricultural sites. Against such developments, the question has arisen as to what extent hedgerows in SRACS can act as an effective windbreak despite their management-related low height of only a few meters. On the basis of multiannual recorded wind velocity data in high resolution at two sites in Germany, it could be shown that the wind speed on crop alleys was reduced significantly by such hedgerows. At the central point of 24 m wide crop alleys, the wind speed decreased on an annual average basis by more than 50 % when compared to the wind speeds of open field. The overall amount of reduction was strongly dependent on the location within the crop alleys, the height of trees, the distance between two hedgerows, and their orientation. In reflection upon these results, it was concluded that the establishment of SRACS could lead to enhanced soil protection against wind erosion and thus to ecological and economic benefits for agricultural sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagley WT (1988) Agroforestry and windbreaks. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22(23):583–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitog JP, Lee I-B, Hwang H-S, Shin M-H, Hong S-W, Seo I-H, Kwon K-S, Mostafa E, Pang Z (2012) Numerical simulation study of a tree windbreak. Biosyst Eng 111:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm C, Quinkenstein A, Freese D (2011) Yield prediction of young black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) plantations for woody biomass production using allometric relations. Annals of Forest Research 54:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm C, Quinkenstein A, Freese D (2012) Vergleichende Betrachtung des Agrarholz- und Energiemaisanbaus aus Sicht des Bodenschutzes. Bodenschutz 02(12):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North America agricultural systems. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleugh HA (1998) Effects of windbreaks on airflow, microclimates and crop yields. Agrofor Syst 41:55–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleugh HA, Miller JM, Böhm M (1998) Direct mechanical effects of wind on crops. Agrofor Syst 41:85–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Q, Feng Z, Pfiz M, Veste M, Kuppers M, He K, Gao J (2012) Trade-off between shrub plantation and wind-breaking in the arid sandy lands of Ningxia, China. Pak J Bot 44:1639–1649

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong Z, Qian G, Luo W, Wang H (2006) Threshold velocity for wind erosion: the effects of porous fences. Environ Geol 51:471–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (2013a) Anbaufläche für nachwachsender Rohstoffe 2012. http://mediathek.fnr.de/grafiken/anbauflache-fur-nachwachsende-rohstoffe-2012-grafik.html. Accessed 30 May 2013

  • Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (2013b) Tabelle der Anbaufläche für nachwachsende Rohstoffe 2012. http://mediathek.fnr.de/grafiken/daten-und-fakten/anbau/anbauflache-fur-nachwachsende-rohstoffe-2012-tabelle.html. Accessed 30 May 2013

  • Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (2010) Erneuerbare Energien in Zahlen—nationale und internationale Entwicklung. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU), Information brochure

  • Foereid B, Bro R, Overgaard Mogensen V, Porter JR (2002) Effects of windbreak strips of willow coppice—modelling and field experiment on barley in Denmark. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank C, Ruck B (2005) Double-arranged mound-mounted shelterbelts: influence of porosity on wind reduction between the shelters. Environ Fluid Mech 5:267–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd MJ, Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ (1996) A wind tunnel study of turbulent flow around single and multiple windbreaks, Part I: velocity fields. Bound-Layer Meteorol 80:127–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22(23):165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv P, Dong Z (2012) Study of the windbreak effect of shrubs as a function of shrub cover and height. Environ Earth Sci 66:1791–1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma R, Wang J, Qu J, Liu H (2010) Effectiveness of shelterbelt with a non-uniform density distribution. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 98:767–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAneney KJ, Judd MJ (1991) Multiple windbreaks: an Aeolian ensemble. Bound-Layer Meteorol 54:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton KG (1988) Effects of windbreaks on turbulent transport and microclimate. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22(23):17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord M (1991) Shelter effects of vegetation belts: results of field measurements. Bound-Layer Meteorol 54:363–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuberg IK (1998) Effect of shelter on temperate crops: a review to define research for Australian conditions. Agrofor Syst 41:3–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oteng’I SBB, Stigter CJ, Ng’Ang’A JK, Mungai DN (2000) Wind protection in a hedged agroforestry system in semiarid Kenya. Agrofor Syst 50:137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzschel M, Bohme G, Krause H (1991) Effects of shelterbelts on crop yield. Feldwirtschaft 32:229–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinkenstein A, Wöllecke J, Böhm C, Grünewald H, Freese D, Schneider BU, Hüttl RF (2009) Ecological benefits of the agroforestry-system alley cropping in sensitive regions of Europe. Environ Sci Policy 12:1112–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollin EM (1983) The influence of wind speed and direction on the reduction of wind speed leeward of a medium porous hedge. Agric Meteorol 30:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld M, Marom G, Bitan A (2010) Numerical simulation of the airflow across trees in a windbreak. Bound-Layer Meteorol 135:89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau BS (1992) The turbulence structure behind the multiple windbreaks across-wind. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 41:461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsonkova P, Böhm C, Quinkenstein A, Freese D (2012) Ecological benefits provided by alley cropping systems for production of woody biomass in the temperate region: a review. Agrofor Syst 85:133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzet A, Wilson JD (2007) Measured winds about a thick hedge. Agric For Meteorol 145:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger PW, Stewart BA, Parr JF, Singh RP (1991) Crop residue management and tillage methods for conserving soil and water in semi-arid regions. Soil Tillage Res 20:219–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Takle ES (1996) On three-dimensionality of shelterbelt structure and its influences on shelter effects. Bound-Layer Meteorol 79:83–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Brandle JR, Meyer GE, Hodges L (1995) The relationship between open windspeed and windspeed reduction in shelter. Agrofor Syst 32:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (Project “AgroForstEnergie II”, Project Number: 22000312), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Project “INKA BB”, Project Number: 01LR0803D) and the Vattenfall Europe New Energy Ltd. for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Böhm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Böhm, C., Kanzler, M. & Freese, D. Wind speed reductions as influenced by woody hedgerows grown for biomass in short rotation alley cropping systems in Germany. Agroforest Syst 88, 579–591 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9700-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9700-y

Keywords

Navigation