Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancing the value of multiple use plantations: a case study from southeast Queensland, Australia

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the 1990s, an expansion of small-scale (farm) forestry in medium to low rainfall areas was considered to be an important part of increasing the national forest estate but it remains a very minor source of timber, largely confined to the higher rainfall areas. In most areas, returns from timber are much less than for alternative land uses, even with low discount rates. If however, there are additional returns from plantation grazing and carbon sequestration and there are other potential management gains, multiple use plantations may be more attractive. The goal of this study is to estimate the net present values of multiple use spotted gum plantations in a medium rainfall area of southeast Queensland. For the case study, production, carbon sequestration and emissions data were supplemented by formal and informal interviews with landholders, sawmill staff and government extension personnel. Forest inventory, biomass and soil sampling, and stakeholder interviews were used as sources of primary data. The costs and benefits data were converted into monetary terms and discounted to produce net present values. Evaluations in this study identify the optimal rotation age of plantations to be 33–34 years. This is the case if including carbon and stock values, and using either farm- or factory-gate timber prices. The net present value increases significantly however if farmers harvest the trees themselves. In addition, at harvesting age, it was found that carbon and stock had the potential to account for 19.2 and 11.4 % respectively of the total returns from spotted gum plantations. Policy initiatives to support the farm forestry sub-sector should include pricing greenhouse gas emissions and developing and strengthening farmers co-operatives and marketing institutions to enhance farmers’ bargaining power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGO (Australian Greenhouse Office) (2000) Land clearing: a social history, National Carbon Accounting System, technical report no. 4, Canberra

  • ANU (Australian National University) (2005) Why is the project on hold? http://sres.anu.edu.au/associated/marketreport/project_on_hold.html. Accessed 25 April 2011

  • Brown AJ (2002) Collaborative governance versus constitutional politics: decision rules for sustainability from Australia’s southeast Queensland Forest Agreement. Environ Sci Policy 5:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Rural Sciences (2009) Australia’s plantations 2009 inventory update, Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra. http://adl.brs.gov.au/mapserv/plant/NPI2009Update.pdf. Accessed 09 March 2012

  • Burns K, Vedi J, Heyhoe E, Ahammad H (2009) Opportunities for forestry under the Carbon pollution reduction scheme (CPRS): an examination of some key factors. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resources Economics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns K, Hug B, Lawson K, Ahammad H, Zhang K (2011) Abatement potential from reforestation under selected carbon price scenarios, ABARES special report prepared for the Australian Treasury, July, 2011, p 39

  • Cacho OJ, Hean RL, Wise RM (2003) Carbon accounting methods and reforestation incentives. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 47:153–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadman T (2003) Managing small-scale plantation in the certified environment. Paper submitted to the XIIth World Forestry Conference, Quebec, Canada. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0991-A1.HTM. Accessed 26 Feb 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Calford EM, Gurney A, Heyhoe E, Ahammad H (2010) The effects of an emissions offsets scheme on Australian agriculture, 10(2): 1–26, March Quarter, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics. http://www.daff.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/1893917/a2.pdf. Accessed 09 March 2012

  • DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries) (2009) Australia’s forests at a glance 2009. Department of Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries, Australian Government

  • DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries) (2010) Australia’s forests at a glance 2010. Department of Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries, Australian Government

  • Dawson IK, Vinceti B, Weber JC, Neufeldt H, Russell J, Lengkeek AG, Kalinganire A, Kindt P, Lillesø JPB, Roshetko J, Jamnadass R (2011) Climate change and tree genetic resource management: maintaining and enhancing the productivity and value of smallholder tropical agroforestry landscapes. A review. Agrofor Syst 81:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DCCEE (Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency) (2010) Design of the carbon farming initiatives: consultation paper, Commonwealth Government Canberra, p 25

  • FAO Forestry (1992) Cost control in forest harvesting and road construction, Paper 99, Estimating Logging Cost Unit, chap 5. FAO of the United Nations, Rome

  • Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haripriya GS (2001) Managing forests in India to mitigate carbon. J Environ Plan Manag 44:701–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huth J, Lee D, Lawson S, Smith T (2004) Hardwood plantation research field tour: tour of hardwood trials in Widebay Burnett region of Queensland’, Queensland Government, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries

  • Isbell RF (2002) The Australian soil classification. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakko Poyry Consulting (2000) Analysis of wood product accounting options for the national carbon accounting system, national carbon accounting system, technical report no 24. Greenhouse Office, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson K, Burns K, Low K, Heyhoe E, Ahammad H (2008) Analysing the economic potential of forestry for carbon sequestration under alternative carbon price paths. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resources Economics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraseni TN, Cockfield G (2011) Crops, cows or timber? Including carbon values in land use choices. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:280–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraseni TN, Cockfield G, Apan A (2007a) A comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from inputs into farm enterprises in southeast Queensland, Australia. J Environ Sci Health Part A 42:11–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maraseni TN, Cockfield G, Apan A (2007b) Estimation of taper rates and volume of smaller size logs in spotted gum saw timber plantations in southeast Queensland. Aust South Hemisphere For J 69:169–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraseni TN, Mathers NJ, Harms B, Cockfield G, Apan A, Maroulis J (2008) Comparing and predicting soil carbon quantities under different land use systems on the Red Ferrosol soils of southeast Queensland. J Soil Water Conserv 63:250–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maraseni TN, Cockfield G, Maroulis J (2009) An assessment of grazing value of lantations-pasture in southeast Queensland, Australia. Aust J Reg Stud 15:297–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraseni TN, Cockfield G and Apan A (2011) Analysis of spacing for spotted gum plantation for maximizing timber volume in southeast Queensland, Australia. J Sustain For 30: 619–636, Yale University, Yale

    Google Scholar 

  • NFI (National Forest Inventory) (2004) National plantation inventory update- March 2004, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra

  • Nichols JD, Geoff R, Smith B, Grant J, Glencross K (2010) Subtropical eucalypt plantations in eastern Australia. Aust For 73:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul KP, Polglase JG, Nyakuengama P, Khanna PK (2002) Change in soil carbon following afforestation. For Ecol Manag 168:241–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul KP, Polglase JG, Richards GP (2003) Sensitivity analysis of predicted change in soil carbon following afforestation. Ecol Model 164:137–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland CRA/RFA Steering Committee (1998) Commercial plantation land capability analysis of southeast Queensland. Queensland CRA/FRA Steering Committee, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards AE, Dalal RC, Schmidt S (2007) Soil carbon turnover and sequestration in native subtropical tree plantations. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2078–2090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross DJ, Tate KR, Scott NA, Wilde RH, Rodda NJ, Townsend JA (2002) Afforestation of pastures with Pinus radiata influences soil carbon and nitrogen pools and mineralisation and microbial properties. Aust J Soil Res 40:1303–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan P, Taylor D (2001) On-farm value addition or mixed hardwood forest products in seq: a case study of comparative costs and returns (case study no 4). Department of Primary Industries, Queensland Government

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn TJ (2005) Financial and economic performance of long-rotation hardwood plantation investments in Queensland, Australia. For Policy Econ 7:437–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood M, Stephens N, Allison B, Howell C (2001) Plantations of Australia 2001 summary report, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/soe/2006/publications/drs/pubs/521/lnd/ld-29-30-plantation-summary-2001.pdf. Accessed 09 March 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Colin Marshall (land owner) for his invaluable advice and hospitality during the fieldwork; Nicole Mathers and Ben Harms for their hard work undertaking soil sampling and analysis and for helpful advice and discussion; David Taylor and Paul Ryan for providing long-term experimental spotted gum data; Him Lal Baral, Ron Bergman, Jason Worling, and Neil Halpin for helpful discussions and machine related data; and the University of Southern Queensland for its logistical support. We are very thankful to Professor Shibu Jose and Associate Professor J. Doland Nichols for their efficient communication. Our thanks also go to anonymous referees for their highly useful and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tek Narayan Maraseni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maraseni, T.N., Cockfield, G., Cadman, T. et al. Enhancing the value of multiple use plantations: a case study from southeast Queensland, Australia. Agroforest Syst 86, 451–462 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9506-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9506-8

Keywords

Navigation