Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Promoting native trees in shade coffee plantations of southern India: comparison of growth rates with the exotic Grevillea robusta

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional shade coffee plantations of Kodagu district, in the Western Ghats of southern India, harbor a high density and diversity of trees. Local farmers appreciate native biodiversity, but plantation economics and public policies drive them to gradually replace the original diversified cover with exotic shade trees such as Grevillea robusta, which grows fast and can be easily traded as timber. In order to identify and recommend native timber trees with fast growth rates, we compared the growth performance of four common native species against that of G. robusta, by fitting steel dendrometer bands on 332 shade trees. Results showed that in general G. robusta had the fastest growth rates, but large trees of the native Acrocarpus fraxinifolius had faster growth in the wet western side of the district. Computer projections of long term performance showed that most species were influenced by bioclimatic zone. Species-specific local environmental effects also occurred, including competition from coffee bushes for A. fraxinifolius, influence of aspect for G. robusta, and management block effects for Lagerstroemia microcarpa. Our results show that native species potentially could produce timber at rates equivalent to those of exotic species. However, as in many tropical countries, data on growth rates of native trees within mixed-cover plantations are scarce and this study underlines the urgent need to screen for fast-growing species. Such information provides a strong basis for recommending appropriate changes in public policies that would improve tree tenure security and encourage farmers to grow more native species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

KFD:

Karnataka Forest Department

LME:

Linear mixed effects

NCI:

Neighbor competition index

BA:

Basal area

References

  • Ambinakudige S, Sathish BN (2009) Comparing tree diversity and composition in coffee farms and sacred forests in the Western Ghats of India. Biodivers Conserv 18:987–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggio AJ, Caramori PH, Androcioli Filho A, Montoya L (1997) Productivity of Southern Brazilian coffee plantations shaded by different stockings of Grevillea robusta. Agrofor Syst 37:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat S, Kushalappa C, Williams P, Brown N (2005) The role of informal protected areas in maintaining biodiversity in the Western Ghats of India. Ecol Soc 10(1): article 8. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art8/

  • Clark DB, Clark DA (1996) Abundance, growth and mortality of very large trees in neotropical lowland rain forest. For Ecol Manag 80:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (1994) Density dependence in two understory tree species in a neotropical forest. Ecology 75:671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK, Tripathi RS (1999) Tree growth and crop yield under agrisilvicultural practices in north-east India. Agrofor Syst 44:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elouard C (2000) Vegetation features in relation to biogeography. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Chandrashekara UM, Elouard C et al (eds) Mountain biodiversity, land use dynamics, and traditional ecological knowledge. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp 25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Elouard C, Chaumette M, de Pommery H (2000) The role of coffee plantations in biodiversity conservation. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Chandrashekara UM, Elouard C et al (eds) Mountain biodiversity, land use dynamics, and traditional ecological knowledge. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp 120–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble JS (1935) Flora of the presidency of Madras. Adlard and Son, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia CA, Bhagwat SA, Ghazoul J et al (2010) Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: challenges and opportunities of coffee agroforestry in the Western Ghats, India. Conserv Biol 24:479–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul J (2007) Challenges to the uptake of the ecosystem service rationale for conservation. Conserv Biol 21:1651–1652

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haller G (1910) Report on land revenue re-settlement of Coorg. Shakti Printers, Madikeri

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood CE (1989) Grevillea robusta: an annotated bibliography. International Council for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jama B, Nair PKR, Kurira PW (1989) Comparative growth performance of some multipurpose trees and shrubs grown at Machakos, Kenya. Agrofor Syst 9:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinganire A (1996) Performance of Grevillea robusta in plantations and on farms under varying environmental conditions in Rwanda. For Ecol Manag 80:279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King DA, Davies SJ, Nur Supardi MN, Tan S (2005) Tree growth is related to light interception and wood density in two mixed Dipterocarp forests of Malaysia. Funct Ecol 19:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King DA, Davies SJ, Noor NSM (2006) Growth and mortality are related to adult tree size in a Malaysian mixed dipterocarp forest. For Ecol Manag 223:152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusters K, De Foresta H, Ekadinata A, van Noordwijk M (2007) Towards solutions for state vs. local community conflicts over forestland: the impact of formal recognition of user rights in Krui, Sumatra, Indonesia. Hum Ecol 35:4427–4438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M, Lieberman D (1985) Simulation of growth curves from periodic increment data. Ecology 66:632–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott JE, Howard SB, Ong CK, Black CR (2000a) Long-term productivity of a Grevillea robusta-based overstorey agroforestry system in semi-arid Kenya. I. Tree growth. For Ecol Manag 139:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott JE, Howard SB, Ong CK, Black CR (2000b) Long-term productivity of a Grevillea robusta-based overstorey agroforestry system in semi-arid Kenya. II. Crop growth and system performance. For Ecol Manag 139:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald MA, Hofny-Collins A, Healey JR, Goodland TCR (2003) Evaluation of trees indigenous to the montane forest of the Blue Mountains, Jamaica for reforestation and agroforestry. For Ecol Manag 175:379–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath CD, Dattaraja HS, Suresh HS et al (2006) Patterns of tree growth in relation to environmental variability in the tropical dry deciduous forest at Mudumalai, southern India. J Biosci 31:651–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nath CD, Pélissier R, Garcia C (2010) Comparative efficiency and accuracy of variable area transects versus square plots for sampling tree diversity and density. Agrofor Syst 79:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson J (2008) Environmental governance in the coffee forests of Kodagu, South India. Transform Cult eJournal 3(1):185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Okorio J, Byenkya S, Wajja N, Peden D (1994) Comparative performance of seventeen upperstorey tree species associated with crops in the highlands of Uganda. Agrofor Syst 26:185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park A, van Breugel M, Ashton M et al (2010) Local and regional environmental variation influences the growth of tropical trees in selection trials in the Republic of Panama. For Ecol Manag 260:12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal J-P (1988) Wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India; ecology, structure, floristic composition and successio. Institut Français de Pondicherry, Pondicherry

    Google Scholar 

  • Pélissier R, Pascal J-P (2000) Two-year tree growth patterns investigated from monthly girth records using dendrometer bands in a wet evergreen forest in India. J Trop Ecol 16:429–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S et al (2008) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-89

  • Puri S, Nair PKR (2004) Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. Agrofor Syst 61:437–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org

  • Russell D, Franzel S (2004) Trees of prosperity: agroforestry, markets and the African smallholder. Agrofor Syst 61:345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaine MD, Hall JB, Alexander IJ (1987) Tree population dynamics at Kade, Ghana (1968–1982). J Trop Ecol 3:331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takaoka S (2008) Long-term growth performance of Cordia africana and Grevillea robusta trees in the Mount Kenya region. Agrofor Syst 72:169–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uriarte M, Condit R, Canham CD, Hubbell SP (2004) A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbors matter? J Ecol 92:348–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijaya TP (2000) Contemporary society and land tenure. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Chandrashekara UM, Elouard C et al (eds) Mountain biodiversity, land use dynamics, and traditional ecological knowledge. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp 44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada M, Gholz HL (2002) Growth and yield of some indigenous trees in an Amazonian agroforestry system: a rural-history-based analysis. Agrofor Syst 55:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York RA, Fuchs D, Battles JJ, Stephens SL (2010) Radial growth responses to gap creation in large, old Sequoiadendron giganteum. Appl Veg Sci 13:498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the CAFNET project of the EuropAid program of the European Union (Connecting, enhancing and sustaining environmental services and market values of coffee agroforestry in Central America, East Africa and India, CAFNET—Europaid/ENV/2006/114-382/TPS), and by a Critical Ecosystems Partnerships Fund Small Grant (to CDN) administered by the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bangalore. We thank the management of Tata Coffee Ltd., BBTC Ltd. (Elkhill Group), Biodiversity Conservation India Ltd., and Kabinakad estate, as well as individual farmers who permitted monitoring of trees at their plantations and participated in interviews. We also thank R. Ramalingam for preparing dendrometer bands, S. Aravajy and N. Barathan for tree identifications, K. M. Nanaya for map preparation, and A. Prathap and J. D. Murugesh for field assistance. Comments from two anonymous reviewers helped improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl D. Nath.

Appendix

Appendix

 

Table 4 Mean annual diameter growth rate of five tree species in coffee plantations of Kodagu, Western Ghats, India (sample size in parentheses)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nath, C.D., Pélissier, R., Ramesh, B.R. et al. Promoting native trees in shade coffee plantations of southern India: comparison of growth rates with the exotic Grevillea robusta . Agroforest Syst 83, 107–119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9401-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9401-8

Keywords

Navigation